The aggressive semantics of John Mann seems to have been swept under the carpet. Labelling those who acknowledge the Haavara Agreement as historical fact or for being anti-Zionist suddenly warrants the title of "Nazi Apologist."
That is offensive. The Haavara Agreement is not.
And who the hell is John Mann to comment on Ken Livingstone? Mann is a total no-mark, Blarite at the centre of the Corbyn Coup.
Mann doesn't know that Livingstone has spent his whole political life (40 years) speaking out against discrimination and racism. Infact, he'd still be mayor of London if it wasn't for the right wing ambush in response to his positive impact on race relations in London.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Why hasn't John Mann been suspended? Watch
- Thread Starter
Last edited by ClintFuk; 04-05-2016 at 16:25.
- 04-05-2016 16:23
- 04-05-2016 17:06
The Havana agreement is historical fact. It isn't fact that Hitler became 'mad' and started randomly killing Jews after the agreement.
The problem is a labour MP supported some clearly anti Semitic tweets (which she later agreed were and apologised for) which was then excused by Livingstone.
There is of course a part of the Blairite tendency which will use any means at its disposal. But there is also a part of the Corbynites tendency who have a tendency to blame all their problems on an establishment (that can seemingly control the actions of Livingstone, Shah etc) much in the same way UKIP blamed the liberal BBC and establishment every time one of their candidates was found to be a racist or a fraudster etc.