Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects...2-QP-JAN13.PDF

    Question 7(e)

    So my understand is that if you double the frequency, the wavelength will be halved right?

    Also

    Here is the MS
    http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects...W-MS-JAN13.PDF

    I don't understand how they managed to get a path difference of 2 lambda? I know that if it is an integer then it will be constructive interference so therefore a maxima but how did they manage to get 2 here?

    Also question 7B(II) is slightly confusing me. Why is the path difference equal to the wavelength?

    Thanks
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by CrazyFool229)
    http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects...2-QP-JAN13.PDF

    Question 7(e)

    So my understand is that if you double the frequency, the wavelength will be halved right?

    Also

    Here is the MS
    http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects...W-MS-JAN13.PDF

    I don't understand how they managed to get a path difference of 2 lambda? I know that if it is an integer then it will be constructive interference so therefore a maxima but how did they manage to get 2 here?

    Also question 7B(II) is slightly confusing me. Why is the path difference equal to the wavelength?

    Thanks
    The MS is a bit confusing... but the MS isn't a model answer. I guess it means 2x new lambda (i.e after the frequency is doubled) making it a maximum (but not the first maximum anymore)
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Joinedup)
    The MS is a bit confusing... but the MS isn't a model answer. I guess it means 2x new lambda (i.e after the frequency is doubled) making it a maximum (but not the first maximum anymore)
    But surely if the frequency has been doubled then the new wavelength will be 1/2 rather than 2? Unless I am being absolutely idiotic here which I probably am!
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by CrazyFool229)
    But surely if the frequency has been doubled then the new wavelength will be 1/2 rather than 2? Unless I am being absolutely idiotic here which I probably am!
    Yeah - my understanding of the question is that the slits, position of the detector and everything else stays the same but that the source frequency is doubled.

    that means the path difference that used to be 1x old lambda is now 2x new lambda (because the length of path difference stays the same but lambda has been halved)
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by CrazyFool229)
    But surely if the frequency has been doubled then the new wavelength will be 1/2 rather than 2? Unless I am being absolutely idiotic here which I probably am!
    Yeah so the path difference will now be two lambda instead of one lambda which corresponds to constructive interference
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Brussels sprouts
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.