Are refugees inherently bad people?

I think it is more accurate to characterise it as a civil war between the ruling Alawite minority and the Sunni Arab majority (the latter being made up of several factions the differences between which are probably greatly overstated in the West) in which a number of countries have involved themselves for their own purposes:

Iran because it is a Shia state and doesn't want to see another Sunni state.

Saudi because it is the leading Sunni state and wants to see another Sunni state.

Russia because it has a naval base there.

The USA and EU for ideological reasons (majority rule as the overriding moral principle that also overrides all practical concerns - we'd surely be better off with Assad or at least taking no position).

Most of the people fleeing seem to be Sunnis and I don't see that as totally unreasonable as many Sunnis may support neither the government nor the rebels. Syria is not a national state. The choice of Germany and Sweden rather than a Turkish displaced persons camp is however an economic one.

Hand to heart least racist person youll ever meet

The obvious thing would be to run to the local command post and be redirected to a military unit. You're not making serious arguments.

You confirm my suspicion. You are an incomplete thinker. Google medical licensing laws. It is nearly impossible for a Syrian doctor to be anything more than a falafel server in Europe.

I wouldn't be much of a man if I wasn't willing to do it for my country, or if need be to defend my family.

A refugee is someone who usually flees adverse circumstances. The Geneva convention defines this as "a person who is outside their country of citizenship because they have well-founded grounds for fear of persecution because of their race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, and is unable to obtain sanctuary from their home country or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail themselves of the protection of that country."

But what kind of person flees a warzone when his country and community is being attacked?

I don't think women or female children, and male children under 10 or 11, should be prevented from fleeing warzones, as long as they aren't abandoning people who are fighting the conflict who depend on them (e.g. as ammunition transporters). But male children should be sent back as soon as they are of fighting or training age.

If it is a man who flees, he should capable of fighting until his late 40s. Should countries accept people who are unwilling to fight even to defend their own community? Is letting people who many would considers cowards into the country a good policy? What kind of value will such people add to the host country? Do countries owe anything to people whom the countries of origin (and most honourable people) would regard as cowards and deserters?

It may come as a surprise to you, but many people in our world do not share your beliefs and, in particular, the value you place on fighting. Not every adult male is able, or willing, to use violence even when threatened.

Not everyone subscribes to patriotism. You may find, if you have studied history, that the notion of loving one's country, or nation-state, is a comparatively modern novelty.

You've raised an interesting topic for debate, but I am curious how tolerant you are of people who don't share your beliefs and values.

The definition you cite may include a person of fighting age. The problem is not their classification, nor their understandable desire to flee, but their acceptance into territories beyond the region surrounding their troubled lands. This acts as a green light for more to leave, and means unsustainable demographic shifts that will ultimately result in the resurgence of the far-right, an increasingly polarised society, and a massive upsurge in anti-immigrant sentiments/attacks, and possibly wider scale persecution. It is to the benefit of no-one, long term, and those who are instigating it are both traitors and acting other than in accordance with the best interests of the populations of said troubled territories (be they stationary [brain/youth drain] or migratory portions of related populations)