# S2 Conditions for Distribution

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

What is the difference between saying probability of success in each trial is same and each probability of success is independent of the others? Surely the second is covered by the first? (Binomial Distribution)

0

reply

Report

#2

(Original post by

What is the difference between saying probability of success in each trial is same and each probability of success is independent of the others? Surely the second is covered by the first? (Binomial Distribution)

**Oblogog**)What is the difference between saying probability of success in each trial is same and each probability of success is independent of the others? Surely the second is covered by the first? (Binomial Distribution)

0

reply

Report

#3

**Oblogog**)

What is the difference between saying probability of success in each trial is same and each probability of success is independent of the others? Surely the second is covered by the first? (Binomial Distribution)

Just to complicate matters, it is perfectly possible to have two binomial random variables where the probability of success for each of them is itself a random variable. Then one could talk about the probabilities of success being dependent or independent.

0

reply

(Original post by

No, the probability of the first trial could be 1/2 and the probability of the second trial could be 1/3 and they could be independent, but have different probabilities.

**Zacken**)No, the probability of the first trial could be 1/2 and the probability of the second trial could be 1/3 and they could be independent, but have different probabilities.

0

reply

Report

#5

(Original post by

What I'm saying is if probability is constant then it implies independent not the other way around

**Oblogog**)What I'm saying is if probability is constant then it implies independent not the other way around

**not independent**to itself, obviously... yet it has the same probability of occurs as itself of occurring.

0

reply

(Original post by

Not so, a trivial counterexample is that if an event A occurs with probability p, then it is

**Zacken**)Not so, a trivial counterexample is that if an event A occurs with probability p, then it is

**not independent**to itself, obviously... yet it has the same probability of occurs as itself of occurring.
0

reply

Report

#7

(Original post by

I don't understand that. Why can't I say "no matter what the probability of x happening is p' and hit 2 birds with one stone?

**Oblogog**)I don't understand that. Why can't I say "no matter what the probability of x happening is p' and hit 2 birds with one stone?

I could pass my exam with probability 1/2 and feel happy with probability 1/2, but passing my exams and feeling happy don't need to be independent events even if they have the same probability.

So a binomial distribution says that each trial is independent of the other

*and*the probability of each trial is the same, those two conditions are different.

0

reply

(Original post by

That's because having the same probability has nothing to do with being independent.

I could pass my exam with probability 1/2 and feel happy with probability 1/2, but passing my exams and feeling happy don't need to be independent events even if they have the same probability.

So a binomial distribution says that each trial is independent of the other

**Zacken**)That's because having the same probability has nothing to do with being independent.

I could pass my exam with probability 1/2 and feel happy with probability 1/2, but passing my exams and feeling happy don't need to be independent events even if they have the same probability.

So a binomial distribution says that each trial is independent of the other

*and*the probability of each trial is the same, those two conditions are different.
0

reply

(Original post by

That makes what I said about probability being constant implying independent wrong (bad use of words) but I don't think it makes what I said about 'same probability no matter what' wrong? By which I mean if you didn't pass exam the happiness probability might change, meaning it doesn't fit the condition same probability no matter what.

**Oblogog**)That makes what I said about probability being constant implying independent wrong (bad use of words) but I don't think it makes what I said about 'same probability no matter what' wrong? By which I mean if you didn't pass exam the happiness probability might change, meaning it doesn't fit the condition same probability no matter what.

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top