Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    What is the difference between saying probability of success in each trial is same and each probability of success is independent of the others? Surely the second is covered by the first? (Binomial Distribution)
    Online

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Oblogog)
    What is the difference between saying probability of success in each trial is same and each probability of success is independent of the others? Surely the second is covered by the first? (Binomial Distribution)
    No, the probability of the first trial could be 1/2 and the probability of the second trial could be 1/3 and they could be independent, but have different probabilities.
    Online

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Oblogog)
    What is the difference between saying probability of success in each trial is same and each probability of success is independent of the others? Surely the second is covered by the first? (Binomial Distribution)
    This is a linguistic thing. Strictly speaking one should say that two random variables are dependent/independent of one another rather than saying that two probabilities of success are dependent/independent of one another. As Zacken has pointed out, it is perfectly possible for two binomial random variables to be independent of one another, but their probabilities of success to be different.

    Just to complicate matters, it is perfectly possible to have two binomial random variables where the probability of success for each of them is itself a random variable. Then one could talk about the probabilities of success being dependent or independent.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    No, the probability of the first trial could be 1/2 and the probability of the second trial could be 1/3 and they could be independent, but have different probabilities.
    What I'm saying is if probability is constant then it implies independent not the other way around. Yet the mark scheme (from CGP book I'm using) likes you to say both instead of just the first.
    Online

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Oblogog)
    What I'm saying is if probability is constant then it implies independent not the other way around
    Not so, a trivial counterexample is that if an event A occurs with probability p, then it is not independent to itself, obviously... yet it has the same probability of occurs as itself of occurring.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    Not so, a trivial counterexample is that if an event A occurs with probability p, then it is not independent to itself, obviously... yet it has the same probability of occurs as itself of occurring.
    I don't understand that. Why can't I say "no matter what the probability of x happening is p' and hit 2 birds with one stone?
    Online

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Oblogog)
    I don't understand that. Why can't I say "no matter what the probability of x happening is p' and hit 2 birds with one stone?
    That's because having the same probability has nothing to do with being independent.

    I could pass my exam with probability 1/2 and feel happy with probability 1/2, but passing my exams and feeling happy don't need to be independent events even if they have the same probability.

    So a binomial distribution says that each trial is independent of the other and the probability of each trial is the same, those two conditions are different.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    That's because having the same probability has nothing to do with being independent.

    I could pass my exam with probability 1/2 and feel happy with probability 1/2, but passing my exams and feeling happy don't need to be independent events even if they have the same probability.

    So a binomial distribution says that each trial is independent of the other and the probability of each trial is the same, those two conditions are different.
    That makes what I said about probability being constant implying independent wrong (bad use of words) but I don't think it makes what I said about 'same probability no matter what' wrong? By which I mean if you didn't pass exam the happiness probability might change, meaning it doesn't fit the condition same probability no matter what.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Oblogog)
    That makes what I said about probability being constant implying independent wrong (bad use of words) but I don't think it makes what I said about 'same probability no matter what' wrong? By which I mean if you didn't pass exam the happiness probability might change, meaning it doesn't fit the condition same probability no matter what.
    same thing, sorry thanks
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Has a teacher ever helped you cheat?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.