Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I was doing a past paper and came across integrating: (1-2cosx)^2
    Why is it incorrect to use the reverse chain rule method?
    Instead, the correct answer is found when you expand it and solve it
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by student277)
    I was doing a past paper and came across integrating: (1-2cosx)^2
    Why is it incorrect to use the reverse chain rule method?
    Instead, the correct answer is found when you expand it and solve it
    What exam board are you doing?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by student277)
    I was doing a past paper and came across integrating: (1-2cosx)^2
    Why is it incorrect to use the reverse chain rule method?
    Instead, the correct answer is found when you expand it and solve it
    The reverse chain rule only applies to functions of the form (ax+b)^n by their linearity. Alternatively, it applies to integrands of the form f'(x)f(x)^n which your one isn't.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Reverse chain rule only works for first degree polynomials. The reason is that if you integrate using reverse chain rule, you will get (trig function) raised to some power and divided by some the derivative of the trig function. Now try to take the derivative of this expression, you will find that the trig function you divided by has it's own derivative and makes the derivative different to the integrand you're dealing with.
    Tl;dr: don't use reverse chain rule unless it's a first order polynomial, or when the derivative of the inside function is present outside the brackets (in the same term).
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    because when you do that you have to introduce a new function of x which you cannot do. try differentiating back you won't get the same
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by oShahpo)
    Reverse chain rule only works for first degree polynomials. The reason is that if you integrate using reverse chain rule, you will get (trig function) raised to some power and divided by some the derivative of the trig function. Now try to take the derivative of this expression, you will find that the trig function you divided by has it's own derivative and makes the derivative different to the integrand you're dealing with.
    Tl;dr: don't use reverse chain rule unless it's a first order polynomial, or when the derivative of the inside function is present outside the brackets (in the same term).
    Thanks. So what you are saying is I should only use the reverse chain rule when x in the bracket has no power, and will not be able to do it with any trigs in a bracket?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Laurenk18)
    What exam board are you doing?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    edexcel
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by student277)
    Thanks. So what you are saying is I should only use the reverse chain rule when x in the bracket has no power, and will not be able to do it with any trigs in a bracket?
    DId you read my post? I said that it will work for functions of the form (ax+b)^n provided that n \neq -1.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    DId you read my post? I said that it will work for functions of the form (ax+b)^n provided that n \neq -1.
    oh okay, thanks. Also what about differentiating using the chain rule, would it sill not work?
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by student277)
    Thanks. So what you are saying is I should only use the reverse chain rule when x in the bracket has no power, and will not be able to do it with any trigs in a bracket?
    When the x has no power (power of 1 to be more precise) OR when the brackets (any function) is multiplied by it's derivative :
    (any function)*(the derivative of that function)
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by student277)
    oh okay, thanks. Also what about differentiating using the chain rule, would it sill not work?
    You can differentiate any composite function using the chain rule.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What's your favourite Christmas sweets?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.