# Weird Circuit Multiple Choice Question?? Watch

Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

Ahhh ive spent about an hour trying different combinations of resistances to try and get the correct answer for this question, but I just can't seem to get the correct answer.

Could anyone please help me to understand this?

The correct answer is 2R (B)

Could anyone please help me to understand this?

The correct answer is 2R (B)

0

reply

Report

#2

I think it's A Level's Question as I have never solved this type of in my O Levels. Sorry, can not help you.

0

reply

Report

#3

(Original post by

Ahhh ive spent about an hour trying different combinations of resistances to try and get the correct answer for this question, but I just can't seem to get the correct answer.

Could anyone please help me to understand this?

The correct answer is 2R (B)

**HasanRaza1**)Ahhh ive spent about an hour trying different combinations of resistances to try and get the correct answer for this question, but I just can't seem to get the correct answer.

Could anyone please help me to understand this?

The correct answer is 2R (B)

I tried to redraw the circuit as shown below.

I believe you can calculate the effective resistance in the series and parallel set up.

0

reply

Report

#4

**HasanRaza1**)

Ahhh ive spent about an hour trying different combinations of resistances to try and get the correct answer for this question, but I just can't seem to get the correct answer.

Could anyone please help me to understand this?

The correct answer is 2R (B)

What are really easy to handle are circuits containing nothing but resistors in series and nothing but resistors in parallel.

first the two resistors on the right hand side (3R and 6R)... those are a pair of resistors in parallel which can be replaced with a single resistor using the rule for parallel resistors. R

_{effective}= (1/R1 + 1/R2)

^{-1}

now the circuit looks like this...

and you've got 3 resistors in series that you can replace with one...

Attachment 531351531355

which you know how to solve as 2 resistors in parallel

0

reply

(Original post by

I tried to redraw the circuit as shown below.

I believe you can calculate the effective resistance in the series and parallel set up.

**Eimmanuel**)I tried to redraw the circuit as shown below.

I believe you can calculate the effective resistance in the series and parallel set up.

However, when i look at this setup, I see that in the first branch with the 4 ohm resistor the resistance is 4R

In the second branch, the resistance is R plus R, plus 0.5R (due to parallel laws).

So overall the resistance in the circuit is 1/2.75 ? which is wrong :s

edit:

Whoops made an error with my calculations, I understand it now, thanks emmanuel )

0

reply

(Original post by

You've got to break the circuit down into bits you can handle.

What are really easy to handle are circuits containing nothing but resistors in series and nothing but resistors in parallel.

first the two resistors on the right hand side (3R and 6R)... those are a pair of resistors in parallel which can be replaced with a single resistor using the rule for parallel resistors. R

now the circuit looks like this...

and you've got 3 resistors in series that you can replace with one...

Attachment 531351531355

which you know how to solve as 2 resistors in parallel

**Joinedup**)You've got to break the circuit down into bits you can handle.

What are really easy to handle are circuits containing nothing but resistors in series and nothing but resistors in parallel.

first the two resistors on the right hand side (3R and 6R)... those are a pair of resistors in parallel which can be replaced with a single resistor using the rule for parallel resistors. R

_{effective}= (1/R1 + 1/R2)^{-1}now the circuit looks like this...

and you've got 3 resistors in series that you can replace with one...

Attachment 531351531355

which you know how to solve as 2 resistors in parallel

Sorry I think the second attachment you provided didnt upload properly? I cant view anything it says the link is invalid

0

reply

**Joinedup**)

You've got to break the circuit down into bits you can handle.

What are really easy to handle are circuits containing nothing but resistors in series and nothing but resistors in parallel.

first the two resistors on the right hand side (3R and 6R)... those are a pair of resistors in parallel which can be replaced with a single resistor using the rule for parallel resistors. R

_{effective}= (1/R1 + 1/R2)

^{-1}

now the circuit looks like this...

and you've got 3 resistors in series that you can replace with one...

Attachment 531351531355

which you know how to solve as 2 resistors in parallel

Never thought of approaching it from right to left combining the 3 ohm and 6 ohm resistor ahh

Thank you again!

0

reply

Report

#8

(Original post by

Thanks for your help

Sorry I think the second attachment you provided didnt upload properly? I cant view anything it says the link is invalid

**HasanRaza1**)Thanks for your help

Sorry I think the second attachment you provided didnt upload properly? I cant view anything it says the link is invalid

I think the diagram by Eimmanuel probably makes it clearer why you can proceed in this order.

0

reply

Report

#9

**Joinedup**)

You've got to break the circuit down into bits you can handle.

What are really easy to handle are circuits containing nothing but resistors in series and nothing but resistors in parallel.

first the two resistors on the right hand side (3R and 6R)... those are a pair of resistors in parallel which can be replaced with a single resistor using the rule for parallel resistors. R

_{effective}= (1/R1 + 1/R2)

^{-1}

now the circuit looks like this...

and you've got 3 resistors in series that you can replace with one...

Attachment 531351531355

which you know how to solve as 2 resistors in parallel

0

reply

Report

#10

(Original post by

How did you simply in the last step, didnt quite understand that step

**metrize**)How did you simply in the last step, didnt quite understand that step

1) Look for resistors obviously in parallel with each other.

The 3R and 6R are obvious and they can be replaced with a singles resistor of value 2R.

2) Any more parallel? No. Then look for series resistors.

Yes. Sum these and replace with a single resistor. The series resistors are R + 2R + R = 4R.

This is placed in parallel with the existing 4R.

3) Look for parallel resistors.

4R || 4R = 2R.

Circuit cannot be reduced any further. Answer = 2R.

1

reply

Report

#11

(Original post by

How did you simply in the last step, didnt quite understand that step

**metrize**)How did you simply in the last step, didnt quite understand that step

and that just leaves you with 4R and 4R in parallel.

1

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top