Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    I resolved in two directions and get different S value in each of them. The bottom S value is correct btw, why is the top one wrong?



    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bealzibub)
    I resolved in two directions and get different S value in each of them. The bottom S value is correct btw, why is the top one wrong?
    You've learnt that resolving in mutually perpendicular directions is really useful, because if you resolve horizontally, then no vertical forces affect anything. If you resolve parallel then no perpendicular forces affect, etc...

    In your top calculation, you've resolved perpendicular to the rod, but failed to take into account the friction force. The friction force does not act parallel to the rod and hence you cannot just ignore it.

    The bottom calculation, when you resolved vertically, the friction is indeed horizontal and hence mutually perpendicular to the direction you're resolving in, so your calculation works out fine.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    You've learnt that resolving in mutually perpendicular directions is really useful, because if you resolve horizontally, then no vertical forces affect anything. If you resolve parallel then no perpendicular forces affect, etc...

    In your top calculation, you've resolved perpendicular to the plane, but failed to take into account the friction force. The friction force does not act parallel to the plane and hence you cannot just ignore it.

    The bottom calculation, when you resolved vertically, the friction is indeed horizontal and hence mutually perpendicular to the direction you're resolving in, so your calculation works out fine.
    Why is friction not parallel to the plane? Isn't friction always parallel to the plane?

    *nvm I thought you meant the plane on which the object was on.
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by oShahpo)
    Why is friction not parallel to the plane? Isn't friction always parallel to the plane?
    This is a rod with an end lying on a rough ground. Left unchecked, the rod will slip horizontally, friction opposes motion and acts in the opposite horizontal direction.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    This is a rod with an end lying on a rough ground. Left unchecked, the rod will slip horizontally, friction opposes motion and acts in the opposite horizontal direction.
    Yea I understand. I thought you meant the rod's frictional force was not parallel to the horizontal plane, which is the actual physical plane on which the rod is.
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by oShahpo)
    Yea I understand. I thought you meant the rod's frictional force was not parallel to the horizontal plane, which is the actual physical plane on which the rod is.
    I can see how that would cause confusion, edited my answer to clarify.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    You've learnt that resolving in mutually perpendicular directions is really useful, because if you resolve horizontally, then no vertical forces affect anything. If you resolve parallel then no perpendicular forces affect, etc...

    In your top calculation, you've resolved perpendicular to the rod, but failed to take into account the friction force. The friction force does not act parallel to the rod and hence you cannot just ignore it.

    The bottom calculation, when you resolved vertically, the friction is indeed horizontal and hence mutually perpendicular to the direction you're resolving in, so your calculation works out fine.
    Thanks, well explained
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bealzibub)
    Thanks, well explained
    No problem.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you like to hibernate through the winter months?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.