Greenard21
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#1
PLEASE HELP!!!

For the 'Outline the key strengths of Utilitarianism' I wrote about the key strengths within Act Utilitarianism and, Rule Utilitarianism. In Act Utilitarianism, I talked about it being consequentialist and why. I then wrote about it being a quantitative pleasure and the hedonic calculus. For example, for the Hedonic calculus, I said it was an empirical process for making moral decisions, and then went on to explain the hedonic calculus. All I said is that it was a strength, I didn't really say why it was a strength. Is what I have put wrong? Should I have said why it is a strength? Will I lose a lot of marks? I then obviously went on to talk about Rule Utilitarianism and did the same thing...
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Current uni students - are you thinking of dropping out of university?

Yes, I'm seriously considering dropping out (176)
14.52%
I'm not sure (56)
4.62%
No, I'm going to stick it out for now (355)
29.29%
I have already dropped out (35)
2.89%
I'm not a current university student (590)
48.68%

Watched Threads

View All