Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter


    For the 'Outline the key strengths of Utilitarianism' I wrote about the key strengths within Act Utilitarianism and, Rule Utilitarianism. In Act Utilitarianism, I talked about it being consequentialist and why. I then wrote about it being a quantitative pleasure and the hedonic calculus. For example, for the Hedonic calculus, I said it was an empirical process for making moral decisions, and then went on to explain the hedonic calculus. All I said is that it was a strength, I didn't really say why it was a strength. Is what I have put wrong? Should I have said why it is a strength? Will I lose a lot of marks? I then obviously went on to talk about Rule Utilitarianism and did the same thing...
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: May 19, 2016
Do you agree with the proposed ban on plastic straws and cotton buds?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.