MeganSaffron
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#1
Hey! How's everyone feeling about the retake tomorrow? Any predictions?


Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Elennox98
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#2
Report 4 years ago
#2
I have a feeling that maybe Loftus and Palmer may come up in Section B and then potentially the Individual Differences approach in Section C? Just because I don't think that either of them have came up in the past 2 years.
2
reply
MeganSaffron
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#3
(Original post by Elennox98)
I have a feeling that maybe Loftus and Palmer may come up in Section B and then potentially the Individual Differences approach in Section C? Just because I don't think that either of them have came up in the past 2 years.
I thought possibly
Section B- maguire, savage-rumbaugh,Griffiths or Samuel and Bryant
Section C - Developmental or social


Posted from TSR Mobile
2
reply
CandyDance
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#4
Report 4 years ago
#4
I agree with the possibility that Social & Developmental might come up because they haven't as much as the other approaches/perspectives

As for Section B there's quite a few studies that could come up, Maguire, Griffiths, Savage Rumbaugh and Samuel and Bryant are the ones that haven't come up since 2012 and before
Other studies that came up in 2013 were, Freud, Rosenhan, Sperry, Loftus & Palmer & BarenCohen
0
reply
seasonalskins
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#5
Report 4 years ago
#5
Behaviourist could come up for section C because that has only been used twice, although totally have a feeling about Social and Developmental!
I also predict Maguire, Savage-Rumbaugh, and Samuel and Bryant may come up for Section B.

What are you hoping to get this time round?
2
reply
CandyDance
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#6
Report 4 years ago
#6
(Original post by seasonalskins)
Behaviourist could come up for section C because that has only been used twice, although totally have a feeling about Social and Developmental!
I also predict Maguire, Savage-Rumbaugh, and Samuel and Bryant may come up for Section B.

What are you hoping to get this time round?
I get what you mean about behaviourist and the studies seem alright and doable. What do you think about Section B??
0
reply
Amy12368
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#7
Report 4 years ago
#7
Do you guys think they will keep to the normal structure for section C or change it up like they did last year?
0
reply
CandyDance
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#8
Report 4 years ago
#8
(Original post by Amy12368)
Do you guys think they will keep to the normal structure for section C or change it up like they did last year?
They could do it again but I don't even remember what it was last year?!! If someone does, please could you reply back to this >_<
0
reply
Year11student
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#9
Report 4 years ago
#9
have tried to predict whats going to come up in section b but cant find all the mark schemes
0
reply
JennaDaisy
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#10
Report 4 years ago
#10
(Original post by CandyDance)
They could do it again but I don't even remember what it was last year?!! If someone does, please could you reply back to this >_<
Last year they changed the 12 marker at the end to strengths and weaknesses about ethics within the approach/perspective and the year before they changed it to lab experiments
if people are predicting right, I can see them changing the 12 marker if social to field experiments, or if behaviourist something like self report, developmental observations, stuff like that!
1
reply
CandyDance
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#11
Report 4 years ago
#11
Thank you so much!!! I feel like it would be worth thinking about field experiments, self reports and observations for the 12 markers
0
reply
Amy12368
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#12
Report 4 years ago
#12
Would it be something like 'outline the strengths and weaknessss of the social approach in terms of field experiments? For example? If they changed it?
0
reply
alexbacon98
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#13
Report 4 years ago
#13
I have a feeling they'll probably pick an easier study i.e. Loftus and Palmer when it comes to results with a couple of harder ones i.e. Savage-Rumbaugh.

I hope to god observation isn't in the 12 marker though, anything else is fine I guess - just need to do better than a C this time.
0
reply
CandyDance
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#14
Report 4 years ago
#14
(Original post by Amy12368)
Would it be something like 'outline the strengths and weaknessss of the social approach in terms of field experiments? For example? If they changed it?
I think it would be something like: Outline strengths and weaknesses of field experiments, support your answer with studies in the social approach (12)
0
reply
Amy12368
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#15
Report 4 years ago
#15
(Original post by CandyDance)
I think it would be something like: Outline strengths and weaknesses of field experiments, support your answer with studies in the social approach (12)
Thank you so much!
0
reply
CandyDance
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#16
Report 4 years ago
#16
(Original post by Amy12368)
Thank you so much!
You'd just mention generic strengths and weaknesses of field experiments and evidence using the studies!!
You're welcome
1
reply
Crowley'sGhost
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#17
Report 4 years ago
#17
(Original post by alexbacon98)
I have a feeling they'll probably pick an easier study i.e. Loftus and Palmer when it comes to results with a couple of harder ones i.e. Savage-Rumbaugh.

I hope to god observation isn't in the 12 marker though, anything else is fine I guess - just need to do better than a C this time.
Same here!
0
reply
lilyathompson
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#18
Report 4 years ago
#18
How would you answer 12 marker because isn't Piliavin the only field experiment in the social approach??
0
reply
alexbacon98
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#19
Report 4 years ago
#19
(Original post by lilyathompson)
How would you answer 12 marker because isn't Piliavin the only field experiment in the social approach??
Could possibly use other social-based studies such as Griffiths, Rosenhan etc, only a guess though
0
reply
CandyDance
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#20
Report 4 years ago
#20
(Original post by alexbacon98)
Could possibly use other social-based studies such as Griffiths, Rosenhan etc, only a guess though
This happened when i was answering a question once where there was only one study but the mark scheme does credit other studies if you back up your points well
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Should there be a new university admissions system that ditches predicted grades?

No, I think predicted grades should still be used to make offers (726)
33.83%
Yes, I like the idea of applying to uni after I received my grades (PQA) (920)
42.87%
Yes, I like the idea of receiving offers only after I receive my grades (PQO) (406)
18.92%
I think there is a better option than the ones suggested (let us know in the thread!) (94)
4.38%

Watched Threads

View All