Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    can someone help me get what equation they have used??
    Attached Images
      
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by djmans)
    can someone help me get what equation they have used??
    Hello there,

    Here, they have simply resolved the weight of the geologist. The calculations show the resolution of the component that is parallel to the side of the mountain. They show that because of the higher incline of the 35 degree side, the minimum force required to climb is larger than that of the 25 degree side. You can then use these values to calculate the work done by the geologist in climbing the mountain, by multiplying the forces by the distance that they would have to cover (I believe that the work done is in fact the same on either side).
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Smithenator5000)
    Hello there,

    Here, they have simply resolved the weight of the geologist. The calculations show the resolution of the component that is parallel to the side of the mountain. They show that because of the higher incline of the 35 degree side, the minimum force required to climb is larger than that of the 25 degree side. You can then use these values to calculate the work done by the geologist in climbing the mountain, by multiplying the forces by the distance that they would have to cover (I believe that the work done is in fact the same on either side).
    ok thanks, but could you explain why we substract 90-35,25.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by djmans)
    ok thanks, but could you explain why we substract 90-35,25.
    It could also have been written as sin25 and sin35, and to be honest I don't know why they did it how they did.

    It's just so as to get the right component of the force.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Alexion)
    It could also have been written as sin25 and sin35, and to be honest I don't know why they did it how they did.

    It's just so as to get the right component of the force.
    thats the thing that confused me
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by djmans)
    thats the thing that confused me
    But yeah, to summarise the initial question, it is simply F=ma, and the cosθ is just in there to get the right component of the acceleration :cute:
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you like to hibernate through the winter months?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.