cicelym
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#1
So I'm revising for the OCR geog SDME tomorrow, with the theme being rivers and coasts, and I was wondering why soft engineering river and coastal defences, rather than hard engineering defences, are usually more sustainable?
0
reply
username2088165
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#2
Report 4 years ago
#2
(Original post by cicelym)
So I'm revising for the OCR geog SDME tomorrow, with the theme being rivers and coasts, and I was wondering why soft engineering river and coastal defences, rather than hard engineering defences, are usually more sustainable?
Soft engineering is often cheaper than hard engineering, so it costs less to implement and maintain. Soft engineering methods also have less impact on the natural environment, because they are designed to integrate with it. For example, hard engineering methods such as groynes disrupt the natural process of longshore drift, reducing the amount of sediment which gets moved along the coast, starving areas further along the coast of sediment and increasing coastal erosion in those areas. Soft engineering methods, on the other hand, such as managed retreat, work with the natural environment and process, not against them, and eventually leads to the formation of wetlands and marshland.

In summary, soft engineering methods have less impact on the environment, and lower economic cost
0
reply
cicelym
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#3
(Original post by Leviathan1741)
Soft engineering is often cheaper than hard engineering, so it costs less to implement and maintain. Soft engineering methods also have less impact on the natural environment, because they are designed to integrate with it. For example, hard engineering methods such as groynes disrupt the natural process of longshore drift, reducing the amount of sediment which gets moved along the coast, starving areas further along the coast of sediment and increasing coastal erosion in those areas. Soft engineering methods, on the other hand, such as managed retreat, work with the natural environment and process, not against them, and eventually leads to the formation of wetlands and marshland.

In summary, soft engineering methods have less impact on the environment, and lower economic cost

Surely soft engineering is a lot less socially sustainable though? But thanks
0
reply
username2088165
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#4
Report 4 years ago
#4
(Original post by cicelym)
Surely soft engineering is a lot less socially sustainable though? But thanks
I'm not sure, what do you mean by socially sustainable?
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

How are you feeling ahead of results day?

Very Confident (26)
8.75%
Confident (38)
12.79%
Indifferent (48)
16.16%
Unsure (76)
25.59%
Worried (109)
36.7%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise