# S3 sample nonsenseWatch

Announcements
#1
You can't combine the mean and the variance of a sample right?
0
3 years ago
#2
(Original post by AlmostNotable)
You can't combine the mean and the variance of a sample right?
Nope?
0
#3
(Original post by Zacken)
Nope?
Nope. or Nope?
0
3 years ago
#4
(Original post by AlmostNotable)
Nope. or Nope?
As in, if you have a population and you take samples then the variance of the samples are fundamentally distinct from the mean of the samples. I'm unsure as to what you mean by 'combine'? When calculating the mean of the samples, you don't concern yourself with the variance and likewise the other way around.
0
#5
(Original post by Zacken)
As in, if you have a population and you take samples then the variance of the samples are fundamentally distinct from the mean of the samples. I'm unsure as to what you mean by 'combine'? When calculating the mean of the samples, you don't concern yourself with the variance and likewise the other way around.
No wait.

X~D(n,m)
How would I do this P(X1+X2+..+X50>t)=?

50X~(50n,m)
or
P(Xn>(t/50))
0
3 years ago
#6
(Original post by AlmostNotable)
No wait.

X~D(n,m)
How would I do this P(X1+X2+..+X50>t)=?

50X~(50n,m)
or
P(Xn>(t/50))
I'm going to assume you mean normal here.

You would do so
0
#7
(Original post by Zacken)
I'm going to assume you mean normal here.

You would do so
Not normal
0
3 years ago
#8
(Original post by AlmostNotable)
Not normal
and then. But you don't know the distribution of .
0
#9
(Original post by Zacken)
then. Then use whatever the CDF/PDF of is to find the probability.

If the population had a mean of m and a variance of n. A sample of 50 is taken, how do I find the P((all 50)>t)?

Population is not normal right?
0
3 years ago
#10
(Original post by AlmostNotable)
If the population had a mean of m and a variance of n. A sample of 50 is taken, how do I find the P(sample>t)?

Population is not normal right?
I edited my answer, sorry. You don't. You can't talk about it in stuff like that generally. Sums of two random variables with distributions of don't necessarily have to have a distribution.
0
#11
(Original post by Zacken)
I edited my answer, sorry. You don't. You can't talk about it in stuff like that generally. Sums of two random variables with distributions of don't necessarily have to have a distribution.
I am probably asking wrong. I'll make a question.

An average ticket for a game of poker is $2 with a standard deviation of$0.7. You want to play 100 games and have $220 to spend on tickets (can't spend winnings). What's the probability that you will run out? How would I do this? 0 reply 3 years ago #12 (Original post by AlmostNotable) I am probably asking wrong. I'll make a question. A average ticket for a game of poker is$2 with a standard deviation of $1. You are going to play 100 games and have$220 to spend on tickets (can't spend winnings). What's the probability that you will run out?

How would I do this?
The expected value will be $200 and the standard deviation will be$10. Then, I think you'll need to invoke the CLT and assume it's approximately normally distributed to complete the question.
0
#13
(Original post by Zacken)
The expected value will be $200 and the standard deviation will be$10. Then, I think you'll need to invoke the CLT and assume it's approximately normally distributed to complete the question.
So will the new thing be T~N(200,100)?

How can you just combine the random variables if you don't know how they are distributed?
0
3 years ago
#14
(Original post by AlmostNotable)
How did you get 10..
Answered your previous question, should now be $7 in accordance to your modified question. 0 reply Thread starter 3 years ago #15 (Original post by Zacken) Answered your previous question, should now be$7 in accordance to your modified question.
I modified my second question to your answer of my modified question.
0
3 years ago
#16
(Original post by AlmostNotable)
I modified my second question to your answer of my modified question.
holds for any random variable, doesn't depend on its distribution at all. Proof involves some wacky marginal stuff. Same for the variance (although variance depends on independence).
0
#17
(Original post by Zacken)
holds for any random variable, doesn't depend on its distribution at all. Proof involves some wacky marginal stuff. Same for the variance (although variance depends on independence).
Okay now I am more confused, how did you get 7?
0.7*100=70/games = 0.7
0
3 years ago
#18
(Original post by AlmostNotable)
Okay now I am more confused, how did you get 7?
0.7*100=70/games = 0.7
You said the standard deviation was 0.7, so the variance is 0.49. Adding up the variances gives 0.49 * 100 = 49 is the variance. So standard deviation is sqrt(49) = 7.
0
#19
(Original post by Zacken)
You said the standard deviation was 0.7, so the variance is 0.49. Adding up the variances gives 0.49 * 100 = 49 is the variance. So standard deviation is sqrt(49) = 7.
Oh right that's how its done if we knew the mean/variance of our games but we have sampling here.
0
#20
(Original post by Zacken)
You said the standard deviation was 0.7, so the variance is 0.49. Adding up the variances gives 0.49 * 100 = 49 is the variance. So standard deviation is sqrt(49) = 7.
The question was

An average ticket for a game of poker is $2 with a standard deviation of$0.7. You want to play 100 games and have $220 to spend on tickets (can't spend winnings). What's the probability that you will run out? The average of all games is$2, not the average of your games.
0
X

new posts

### 1,104

people online now

### 225,530

students helped last year
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### University open days

• Sheffield Hallam University
Tue, 20 Aug '19
• Bournemouth University
Wed, 21 Aug '19
• University of Dundee
Mon, 26 Aug '19

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Are you going to self-release into Clearing?

Yes I've pressed the button (97)
18.91%
No I'm happy with my uni offer (326)
63.55%
Not yet but I am planning to (24)
4.68%
Not yet but I might (66)
12.87%