Is feminism responsible for Global Warming? Watch

dolan m
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 3 years ago
#1
  1. I'll keep it simple.

    1. We are told that global warming is the most important issue of our times. The entire well-being of the planet is dependent upon how much effort we put into reducing our carbon emissions. This global warming is, allegedly, so important that billions of dollars and a huge amount of human energy must now be expended every year in order to counter it.

    2. One of the very best ways to reduce our carbon emissions is to live together rather than to live apart. By living together - e.g. getting married - people can save on heating, transport, wastage and living space. Traffic congestion and pollution would be reduced enormously and time spent travelling would be cut. And so on.

    Indeed, if my memory is correct, 1.5 million new houses need to be built in the UK just because of the tendency for people to live alone these days.

    3. So why is it that whenever the global warming issue is discussed in the mainstream you never hear the politicians talking about policies that would encourage people to live together? We hear talk about just about everything else to do with cutting our carbon emissions, but not about policies designed to encourage people to get married or to live together.

    If global warming is the most important issue of our times, then why, in connection with this issue, are the mainstream media and the government not promoting polices that would encourage marriage?

    It doesn't make sense - until, that is, you realise that there is a very powerful group of dysfunctional people - feminists - whose main aim is to encourage family breakdown. No way are they going to allow politicians to encourage marriage; specifically heterosexual marriage.

    I know that it sounds crazy, but it is true.

    For example, the feminists will say, "Oh no, you must not encourage marriage - because "marriage oppresses women" - and what about those poor vulnerable women who are forever being abused? We must not do anything that reduces their chances of escaping."

    And the politicians and the media know this feminist tactic very well. And if they upset the media feminists by suggesting that marriage should be encouraged, they will be hit very hard by them via the media.

    The politicians are terrified of these selfish women; because they have learned over the years just how nasty they can be.

    The main aims of feminists are to stir up hatred towards men and to break apart as much as possible people's close relationships.

    And they will allow nothing to get in the way of these main aims.

    Indeed, the huge negative effects of family breakdown and fatherlessness on our societies and our children is also well-documented and very visible. But feminists will still fight viciously against anything that increases the chances of close heterosexual relationships forming and/or succeeding.

    Their Number One priority remains at the very top of the agenda; to encourage relationships to break down.

    In other words, as far as they are concerned, our children and our planet can go to Hell. Their Number One priority remains at the very top of the agenda; to encourage relationships to break down.

    ------------------------

    And now I have a question for you.

    Do you really think that the government and the powers that be cannot see the connections between carbon emissions, wastage, pollution, traffic congestion etc etc and the tendency for people to live apart?

    Do you really think that they do not realise that family breakdown and fatherlessness cause a multitude of very serious problems to millions of people? - with so many of these damaging problems being lifelong for them.

    Do you really think that they remain unaware of the billions of dollars and of the huge resources that the country has had to expend over the years in order to try to counter all these problems?

    Of course they can see these things.

    So why do they say and do nothing about them?

    And the answer is this.

    They benefit from all these problems.

    And this is why they are also forever promoting policies that both cause and exacerbate these problems.
0
reply
ABeingOnEarth
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#2
Report 3 years ago
#2
lol
2
reply
IXxi HIIDA ixXI
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#3
Report 3 years ago
#3
"1. I'll keep it simple."
>"simple"
2
reply
George VI
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#4
Report 3 years ago
#4
It's the trans

trans
-formation

there is a transformation of the earth

as it changes from masculine to feminine ground

rep me for truth
1
reply
Tsrsarahhhh
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#5
Report 3 years ago
#5
Wth I think the link you are trying to make between the two subjects is a bit of a stretch.
2
reply
Plagioclase
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#6
Report 3 years ago
#6
what on earth is this
4
reply
George VI
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#7
Report 3 years ago
#7
(Original post by Tsrsarahhhh)
Wth I think the link you are trying to make between the two subjects is a bit of a stretch.
stretch

stretch marks

women?? therefore on subject
0
reply
aproned_samurai
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#8
Report 3 years ago
#8
(Original post by Plagioclase)
what on earth is this
The most genius thing ever written.....

Spoiler:
Show
in the twilight zone
0
reply
HFBS
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#9
Report 3 years ago
#9
TL;DR
0
reply
TheWaffle
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#10
Report 3 years ago
#10
I am a feminist and I care about global warming. Don't generalize.


Name:  aborable.jpg
Views: 141
Size:  70.9 KB



The picture of the piglets is just there to lighten this thread up as it'll be too serious.
1
reply
George VI
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#11
Report 3 years ago
#11
(Original post by TheWaffle)
I am a feminist and I care about global warming. Don't generalize.


Name:  aborable.jpg
Views: 141
Size:  70.9 KB



The picture of the piglets is just there to lighten this thread up as it'll be too serious.
piglets

guess who also pig? bad manners

ergo modern women

it's all linked
0
reply
beautifulbigmacs
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#12
Report 3 years ago
#12
I was anticipating the op to be some awful troll saying something about feminists and hot air. My bad lol!

Having read the OP, actually, your argument encouraged me to think and I think it is perhaps a plausible theory. Other sociological factors that contribute to global warming could be technology and longer working hours require more energy, larger population means more energy use and more cars on the road.

If global warming really is caused by people then I guess it's possible that multiple sociological factors could contribute.
0
reply
aproned_samurai
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#13
Report 3 years ago
#13
0
reply
OGGUS
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#14
Report 3 years ago
#14
Someone's clearly anti-feminist
0
reply
TheWaffle
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#15
Report 3 years ago
#15
(Original post by George VI)
piglets

guess who also pig? bad manners

ergo modern women

it's all linked
looooool

But I am a modern woman and I am polite.

What do modern women do that's more bad mannered than men?
0
reply
beautifulbigmacs
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#16
Report 3 years ago
#16
Women living apart from men isn't necessarily a feminism thing though. Male roles have changed over the generations and their dedication to one partner and family life can be fleeting. There are single mums out there who did not choose such circumstance as a first choice.
0
reply
IXxi HIIDA ixXI
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#17
Report 3 years ago
#17
If the average Homo sapien male stands near a camp fire and had a mutation which cause his testicles to glow, then would he be contributing towards global warming?
1
reply
George VI
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#18
Report 3 years ago
#18
(Original post by TheWaffle)
looooool

But I am a modern woman and I am polite.

What do modern women do that's more bad mannered than men?
Cause global warming
0
reply
Milzime
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#19
Report 3 years ago
#19
ILLUMINARTY CONFIrMEND
0
reply
dolan m
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#20
Report Thread starter 3 years ago
#20
(Original post by Tsrsarahhhh)
Wth I think the link you are trying to make between the two subjects is a bit of a stretch.
It's more of a knock-on effect of feminism.

The rising divorce rate and the amount of broken homes means that more housing is required. More housing = greater carbon emissions. Not difficult to understand to be honest.

Is it really so hard to believe? Feminism has been one of the most influential ideologies of the past thirty years. Of course there are going to be wider ramifications outside of what they were trying to achieve.

Unless of course you think that feminism is not responsible for rising divorce rates?
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts

All the exam results help you need

847

people online now

225,530

students helped last year

How are you feeling about GCSE Results Day?

Hopeful (203)
12.7%
Excited (139)
8.69%
Worried (291)
18.2%
Terrified (363)
22.7%
Meh (143)
8.94%
Confused (35)
2.19%
Putting on a brave face (221)
13.82%
Impatient (204)
12.76%

Watched Threads

View All