Need help with this question Watch

mapuleng
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#1
A cost benefit analysis concludes that a nuclear power station project might be socially worthwhile, although it will take 10 years to bring into operation.

Why might a government decide NOT to undertake the project?
The answer is C . The government believes that the project has too high an opportunity cost.

Can someone elaborate why this is the correct answer
0
reply
jgood
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#2
Report 2 years ago
#2
Probably as a nuclear power station project is very expensive so the opportunity cost is high - for example, government spending could be spent on education, health etc.
Also, the project takes ten years so the benefits have a large time lag. Therefore, the opp. cost in the short term (the next ten years) is the money that could be spent on things that would benefit people in the short term.
0
reply
mapuleng
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#3
Thank you sooo much. I now understand
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

University open days

  • SOAS University of London
    Postgraduate Open Day Postgraduate
    Wed, 29 May '19
  • University of Exeter
    Undergraduate Open Day - Penryn Campus Undergraduate
    Thu, 30 May '19
  • Cranfield University
    Cranfield Forensic MSc Programme Open Day Postgraduate
    Fri, 31 May '19

How did your AQA A-level Business Paper 1 go?

Loved the paper - Feeling positive (143)
21.22%
The paper was reasonable (329)
48.81%
Not feeling great about that exam... (126)
18.69%
It was TERRIBLE (76)
11.28%

Watched Threads

View All