Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    A cost benefit analysis concludes that a nuclear power station project might be socially worthwhile, although it will take 10 years to bring into operation.

    Why might a government decide NOT to undertake the project?
    The answer is C . The government believes that the project has too high an opportunity cost.

    Can someone elaborate why this is the correct answer
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Probably as a nuclear power station project is very expensive so the opportunity cost is high - for example, government spending could be spent on education, health etc.
    Also, the project takes ten years so the benefits have a large time lag. Therefore, the opp. cost in the short term (the next ten years) is the money that could be spent on things that would benefit people in the short term.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Thank you sooo much. I now understand
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you like to hibernate through the winter months?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.