twhiddy
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#1
Could someone explain it simply, almost a baby-like way? All the sources I find seem to complicate the subject and I can't find a reliable definition.
0
reply
SadOnions
Badges: 9
Rep:
?
#2
Report 4 years ago
#2
You're basically looking for quotes from either Historians or prominent figures from that era, people who could be classed as an authority on whatever period of history it is that you're studying. For example I'm currently studying Britain from 1951 to 2007, quotes from Andrew Marr count as Historiography if he says something related to the subject e.g. The 1970's had a background crackle of violence. Alternatively Edwina Curry a minister from John Major's government said that John Major was 'the nicest man to ever work in government but the worst one to become Prime Minister', even though she isn't a Historian she was still around during the period and her quotes can therefore be used.

tldr: Historiography is just quotes from people who are an authority on that period of History that you can then shove into your essays, look smart and get marks!
1
reply
twhiddy
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#3
(Original post by SadOnions)
You're basically looking for quotes from either Historians or prominent figures from that era, people who could be classed as an authority on whatever period of history it is that you're studying. For example I'm currently studying Britain from 1951 to 2007, quotes from Andrew Marr count as Historiography if he says something related to the subject e.g. The 1970's had a background crackle of violence. Alternatively Edwina Curry a minister from John Major's government said that John Major was 'the nicest man to ever work in government but the worst one to become Prime Minister', even though she isn't a Historian she was still around during the period and her quotes can therefore be used.

tldr: Historiography is just quotes from people who are an authority on that period of History that you can then shove into your essays, look smart and get marks!
Thank you so much! This explanation helped a lot :-D
0
reply
Audrey18
Badges: 21
#4
Report 4 years ago
#4
(Original post by twhiddy)
Thank you so much! This explanation helped a lot :-D
You also need to know the differences between historians who were either intentionalists or struturalists. You will need to know at least two historians for each so that you can quote them in the exams. Historiography is normally required in source based questions so you will need to have the background knowledge of the topic, historians who were either intentionalists or structuralists and also answer the question that is asked in the actual question itself.
1
reply
ageshallnot
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#5
Report 4 years ago
#5
(Original post by twhiddy)
Could someone explain it simply, almost a baby-like way? All the sources I find seem to complicate the subject and I can't find a reliable definition.
Try this:
http://www.historytoday.com/john-cla...ncluded-essays

(Original post by Audrey18)
You also need to know the differences between historians who were either intentionalists or struturalists. You will need to know at least two historians for each so that you can quote them in the exams. Historiography is normally required in source based questions so you will need to have the background knowledge of the topic, historians who were either intentionalists or structuralists and also answer the question that is asked in the actual question itself.
There are other types of historian. See the above and also https://www.librarything.com/topic/61376 or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historiography.

(Original post by SadOnions)
You're basically looking for quotes from either Historians or prominent figures from that era, people who could be classed as an authority on whatever period of history it is that you're studying. For example I'm currently studying Britain from 1951 to 2007, quotes from Andrew Marr count as Historiography if he says something related to the subject e.g. The 1970's had a background crackle of violence. Alternatively Edwina Curry a minister from John Major's government said that John Major was 'the nicest man to ever work in government but the worst one to become Prime Minister', even though she isn't a Historian she was still around during the period and her quotes can therefore be used.

tldr: Historiography is just quotes from people who are an authority on that period of History that you can then shove into your essays, look smart and get marks!
Edwina Currie is not a historian, though she does know an awful lot about John Major!
1
reply
Carnationlilyrose
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#6
Report 4 years ago
#6
(Original post by ageshallnot)
Edwina Currie is not a historian, though she does know an awful lot about John Major!
*smirks*
0
reply
ageshallnot
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#7
Report 4 years ago
#7
(Original post by Carnationlilyrose)
*smirks*
I'm glad someone got the reference!!!
0
reply
Carnationlilyrose
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#8
Report 4 years ago
#8
(Original post by ageshallnot)
I'm glad someone got the reference!!!
It has to be someone old enough...
0
reply
ageshallnot
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#9
Report 4 years ago
#9
(Original post by Carnationlilyrose)
It has to be someone old enough...
I'm far too much of a gentleman to point that out...
0
reply
Carnationlilyrose
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#10
Report 4 years ago
#10
(Original post by ageshallnot)
I'm far too much of a gentleman to point that out...
More of one than John Major, for sure.
0
reply
ChaoticButterfly
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#11
Report 4 years ago
#11
"Historiography is the study of the methodology of historians in developing history as an academic discipline, and by extension is any body of historical work on a particular subject."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historiography
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Should there be a new university admissions system that ditches predicted grades?

No, I think predicted grades should still be used to make offers (738)
33.92%
Yes, I like the idea of applying to uni after I received my grades (PQA) (929)
42.69%
Yes, I like the idea of receiving offers only after I receive my grades (PQO) (413)
18.98%
I think there is a better option than the ones suggested (let us know in the thread!) (96)
4.41%

Watched Threads

View All