Petition - Sign if you dissaprove of users getting punished for "disagreeing"

Watch
This discussion is closed.
Just an LSE guy
Badges:
#141
Report 15 years ago
#141
(Original post by Pencil Queen)
He was getting quite confused - he seemed to think the attacks on his bad manners and attitude were attacks on LSEs quality of research :rolleyes:

All appears to have gone quiet in that corner of the world for a while though.

You might want to look up BIDDLESTICKS though - another LSE-er with a similar outlook on life to yourself and Mr Hewins
Sounds like a diabolical trinity
0
PQ
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#142
Report 15 years ago
#142
(Original post by Just an LSE guy)
Sounds like a diabolical trinity
I'm afraid J.S. has been lost from the fold permanently though...Mr Hewins was quite rude.
0
endorf
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#143
Report 15 years ago
#143
(Original post by Pencil Queen)
i) the DON thing generally consists of members directing other subscribers towards "bad/neg rep worthy" behaivior. It's by no means organised.
didnt you just define the term organisation in this explanation ??

(Original post by Pencil Queen)
Which doesn't really surprise me...it's not like you're my biggest fan anyway :rolleyes:

And you can't say that the sentiment was never returned from your end...
i have always said what i thought of you directly, to allow you to respond in your usually arrogant manor. its funny, these quotes show you in an entirely different light. if i ever respected anything about you, it was your ability to respond to critisism in a diplomatic fashion, now this has been quashed. you are no better than anyone else, and if i am or have in the past been guilty of insulting other members, you are no better. and you hoped we would never see these comments.
0
Just an LSE guy
Badges:
#144
Report 15 years ago
#144
(Original post by Pencil Queen)
tut tut Gnostic - don't you know that I've now been christened "Biro Nerd"
Hewins’ field of expertise does not cover the area of nerdology (though he may be a subject of that field). Hence my baptism of “Nerd Queen” for you outranks his designation.
0
Just an LSE guy
Badges:
#145
Report 15 years ago
#145
(Original post by Pencil Queen)
...Mr Hewins was quite rude.
Got any quotes you could share?
0
Vienna
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#146
Report 15 years ago
#146
(Original post by Pencil Queen)
You mean the one attached - the one that had a whole 20 posts and hasn't been looked at since May?
i believe there are roughly 20 subscribers, or were you all indifferent to whom among you may be suitable?

i) the DON thing generally consists of members directing other subscribers towards "bad/neg rep worthy" behaivior. It's by no means organised.
oh...

"the Original Don is back!"

"Hehe and AT - it was Piggy that said about it being the Sunbscriberito mafia and signing everything Don. I don't think its gone too far. In fact I haven't donned anyone... "

"I have yet to become a Don "

"Lol, waiting2smile is covering for you as well. We need Chicken to re-subscribe, she started the Don thing!"

"It's nobody, Chicken once neg repped somebody but she meant to say "don't .,...... somthing...." but she pressed enter to soon, so it just read "Don" the trend started from there and esculated. "

AT: "There is no escaping now, and if anybody annoys you and you want to negative rep them feel free sign it it "The Don"."

Fluffy: "Doh! Just seen Crana's Who is The Don thread! She's up for some neg rep tomorrow now! Re: her comments about subscriber 'privledges'...To coin a phrase 'deary me..!' "

"I've just seen it now, I tried to avoid it, however it is the truth that Iam not the Don. I have just witheld the fact that I was a don"

AT:" Heh, did you totally miss Expression pretty much giving it away in crana's thread that you signed rep "The Don"?"


"Yeah although by accident, she was going to say don't somthing... but she pressed enter at don by accident. So the person just got "Don" on their neg rep.I think PQ started the Don conspiracy but I... "
well what have we got here? and this is just off of the first page!!

a trend? a conspiracy? is that Expression i see participating in this little game?

that constitutes a very serious offence in my understanding of the forum. at the least, many members have been badly let down.
0
H&E
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#147
Report 15 years ago
#147
(Original post by an Siarach)
Dont be so pedantic. You complained of the apparent arrogance displayed by Vienna and others of the forum ,she has just rebuked this claim.
Actually she has not. She's merely pointed out that I did not contribute to creating the "rules" I was objecting to. Which I'd've thought more thant a little obvious, given my opinion of them.
0
Shane_Filan
Badges: 0
#148
Report 15 years ago
#148
(Original post by Just an LSE guy)
Got any quotes you could share?
(Original post by WAS Hewins)

I sexually abuse small, furry animals
0
Just an LSE guy
Badges:
#149
Report 15 years ago
#149
[QUOTE=vienna95]
(Original post by Pencil Queen)
You mean the one attached - the one that had a whole 20 posts and hasn't been looked at since May?


i) the DON thing generally consists of members directing other subscribers towards "bad/neg rep worthy" behaivior. It's by no means organised.

"the Original Don is back!"

"Hehe and AT - it was Piggy that said about it being the Sunbscriberito mafia and signing everything Don. I don't think its gone too far. In fact I haven't donned anyone... "

"I have yet to become a Don "

"Lol, waiting2smile is covering for you as well. We need Chicken to re-subscribe, she started the Don thing!"

"It's nobody, Chicken once neg repped somebody but she meant to say "don't .,...... somthing...." but she pressed enter to soon, so it just read "Don" the trend started from there and esculated. "

AT: "There is no escaping now, and if anybody annoys you and you want to negative rep them feel free sign it it "The Don"."

Fluffy: "Doh! Just seen Crana's Who is The Don thread! She's up for some neg rep tomorrow now! Re: her comments about subscriber 'privledges'...To coin a phrase 'deary me..!' "

"I've just seen it now, I tried to avoid it, however it is the truth that Iam not the Don. I have just witheld the fact that I was a don"

AT:" Heh, did you totally miss Expression pretty much giving it away in crana's thread that you signed rep "The Don"?"


"Yeah although by accident, she was going to say don't somthing... but she pressed enter at don by accident. So the person just got "Don" on their neg rep.I think PQ started the Don conspiracy but I... "


well what have we got here? and this is just off of the first page..a trend? a conspiracy? is that Expression i see participating in this little game?

that constitutes a very serious offence in my understanding of the forum. at the least, many members have been badly let down.
Sounds like our French friend is getting all Napoleon-like…
0
Vienna
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#150
Report 15 years ago
#150
(Original post by Just an LSE guy)
Sounds like our French friend is getting all Napoleon-like…
hehe..
0
an Siarach
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#151
Report 15 years ago
#151
(Original post by H&E)
Actually she has not. She's merely pointed out that I did not contribute to creating the "rules" I was objecting to. Which I'd've thought more thant a little obvious, given my opinion of them.
Well you may notice that these rules are part of a 'sticky' thread at the top of the forum. What exactly has been stopping you from contributing?
0
endorf
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#152
Report 15 years ago
#152
(Original post by vienna95)
well what have we got here? and this is just off of the first page!!

a trend? a conspiracy? is that Expression i see participating in this little game?

that constitutes a very serious offence in my understanding of the forum. at the least, many members have been badly let down.
i would just love to see pencil queen attempt to defend this as "by no means organised".

look at this piece of organisation also :

http://yrh.realzeal.net/Wanted%20More%20Dons.htm
0
PQ
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#153
Report 15 years ago
#153
(Original post by endorf)
didnt you just define the term organisation in this explanation ??
Just because someone posts a link to a thread which they feel deserves neg rep doesn't mean that anyone will respond...unless they do beleive that it's worthy of it and are able to hand out rep at that time...in which case there's a good chance they would have found the thread/posts and responded in that way anyway....in fact the most "organised" neg repping (of you incidentally) was all done long before anyone posted onto the moaning thread and without the aid of communication between the people involved...you just managed to inspire a large number of the subscribers simultaneously

i have always said what i thought of you directly, to allow you to respond in your usually arrogant manor. its funny, these quotes show you in an entirely different light. if i ever respected anything about you, it was your ability to respond to critisism in a diplomatic fashion, now this has been quashed.
Yup - I am less diplomatic when expressing my opinions "behind closed doors". But then I try to be diplomatic to prevent personally based flame wars - if flaming happens it should be based around subjects or behaivior not personalities. I do happen to believe you've behaved like an idiot on many an occassion (and I don't consider myself immune from the same accusation...I can be a right cow). But rather than argue with who a person is I'd rather argue with their opinions...what I think of them personally never gets said...apart from "in private" either in my own head or amongst friends.
0
Vienna
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#154
Report 15 years ago
#154
(Original post by H&E)
Actually she has not. She's merely pointed out that I did not contribute to creating the "rules" I was objecting to.
'objecting to' after you were asked if there were any objections. i cant help it if u were 'slow' on the uptake.
0
endorf
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#155
Report 15 years ago
#155
(Original post by Pencil Queen)
in fact the most "organised" neg repping (of you incidentally) was all done long before anyone posted onto the moaning thread and without the aid of communication between the people involved...you just managed to inspire a large number of the subscribers simultaneously
HAHAHAH read my above post... LIAR !! no communication ??
0
LH
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#156
Report 15 years ago
#156
Don't read too much into the reasons for deletion - they're just a joke.

Where are you getting these images of the Subscriber forum?
0
Shane_Filan
Badges: 0
#157
Report 15 years ago
#157
this is wel sad - its only a forum for gods sake!
0
PQ
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#158
Report 15 years ago
#158
(Original post by vienna95)
well what have we got here? and this is just off of the first page!!

a trend? a conspiracy? is that Expression i see participating in this little game?

that constitutes a very serious offence in my understanding of the forum. at the least, many members have been badly let down.
many members let down because chicken made a mistake when neg repping dazya and it became a running joke?

The recipients of neg rep probably would have recieved it with or without the whole "don" thing...but rather than anonymous neg rep it was signed.

It didn't take long for people to realise that rep signed don was from a subscriber (specifically don subscriberino).

If you truely take this place and rep that seriously that you think some friends having a laugh about signing rep is a "serious offence" it might be worth getting out a little more.

Not only is this place JUST a forum - one of thousands...but rep is pretty much universally agreed to be pointless and a joke anyway.
0
Vienna
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#159
Report 15 years ago
#159
(Original post by Shane_Filan)
this is wel sad - its only a forum for gods sake!
indeed, a great shame...
0
Shane_Filan
Badges: 0
#160
Report 15 years ago
#160
(Original post by vienna95)
indeed, a great shame...
youre the one complaining about it!
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Have you made your firm and insurance uni choices yet?

Yes (99)
53.8%
Yes, but I want to swap them (14)
7.61%
No, but I know who I want to choose (18)
9.78%
No, I still don't know who I want to choose (46)
25%
I have decided I don't want to go to uni anymore and will not be choosing (7)
3.8%

Watched Threads

View All