Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    When do you consider the resolved forces and when you don't?
    Like whenever I need to do a question involving a particle moving up/down an inclined plane, I tend to resolve all the forces before hand.
    For example, in June 2008, to do part b) you shouldn't consider 3.5gsin20 (horiz). If I was to do the question I would've done:
    R(<--); F=3.5gsin20-(miu)R=0

    But the mark scheme says to simply do Fmax=(miu)R.

    I might be doing a really stupid mistake but I can't think. Thanks.Name:  m2.png
Views: 93
Size:  53.5 KB
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    13
    Study Helper
    (Original post by RK1998)
    R(<--); F=3.5gsin20-(miu)R=0
    The problem here is that you've set F=0 effectively, but F does not equal zero because of the the acceleration.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    The problem here is that you've set F=0 effectively, but F does not equal zero because of the the acceleration.
    Oh you're right. I completely ignored the fact that velocity isn't constant :/

    But anw, would the same apply for other questions?
    Like you should not consider the resolved forces if acceleration doesn't equal to zero, right?

    Thank you
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    13
    Study Helper
    (Original post by RK1998)
    Oh you're right. I completely ignored the fact that velocity isn't constant :/

    But anw, would the same apply for other questions?
    Like you should not consider the resolved forces if acceleration doesn't equal to zero, right?

    Thank you
    You can consider resolved forces, as long as you use F=ma, rather than F=0.

    F=0 is in fact a special case of F=ma, where there is no acceleration.

    Acceleration here is the component of the acceleration in the direction that you're resolving forces.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    You can consider resolved forces, as long as you use F=ma, rather than F=0.

    F=0 is in fact a special case of F=ma, where there is no acceleration.

    Acceleration here is the component of the acceleration in the direction that you're resolving forces.
    Thank you That makes so much more sense now!
    Well, in this case, acceleration was unknown so not considering the components was more realistic, or that's what I understood :3
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    13
    Study Helper
    (Original post by RK1998)
    Thank you That makes so much more sense now!
    Well, in this case, acceleration was unknown so not considering the components was more realistic, or that's what I understood :3
    Since the package is moving, friction will be maximum, so as the markscheme says.

    On reflection you're not told whether there is air resistance or not, so you don't know what forces are acting. So trying to work in terms of forces and acceleration is not the way to do it. Edit: See below.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    Since the package is moving, friction will be maximum, so as the markscheme says.

    On reflection you're not told whether there is air resistance or not, so you don't know what forces are acting. So trying to work in terms of forces and acceleration is not the way to do it.
    Yeah..
    Thank you so much
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    13
    Study Helper
    (Original post by RK1998)
    Yeah..
    Thank you so much
    Correcting myself.

    You're going to have to assume no air resistance etc. otherwise there's no way to work out the frictional force, which you need to find the Coeff of friction.

    I don't know how the markscheme has done it, but there are serveral methods. Given the first part of the question, then considering work done against friction is the easiest way to go.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you like to hibernate through the winter months?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.