You are Here: Home

MEI M1 Jan 13 Question 7 watch

1. This question makes no sense please someone help me!! http://www.mei.org.uk/files/papers/M1_Paper_Jan13.pdf
Much appreciated.
(Page 6)
2. (Original post by Kenzar234)
This question makes no sense please someone help me!! http://www.mei.org.uk/files/papers/M1_Paper_Jan13.pdf
Much appreciated.
(Page 6)
Which part are you stuck with?
3. Part iii) v) vi)
4. (Original post by Kenzar234)
Part iii) v) vi)
I've just done it, how far did yo get with those parts?
5. (Original post by Dowel)
I've just done it, how far did yo get with those parts?
Still kind of stuck. I don't understand the idea of resolving horizontal or vertically. Or vertical equilibrium. If you could explain these it would help a huge.
6. (Original post by Kenzar234)
Still kind of stuck. I don't understand the idea of resolving horizontal or vertically. Or vertical equilibrium. If you could explain these it would help a huge.
So the whole idea with that is that perpendicular forces cannot act against each other, this bit is quite a simple concept, it's similar to how if you walk directly north you don't move any amount east or west.

now you have to apply this to forces, a horizontal force has no vertical component and vice versa, therefore they do not interact.

Back to the east west analogy, if you walk at an angle you are moving partly north and partly east/west and applying this to forces means that if a force isn't acting perpendicular to another force, these forces must be interacting.

To resolve with angles, if you want the horizontal component of a force you do Fcos(angle to the horizontal) or Fsin(angle to the vertical) and vice versa for vertical components.
7. (Original post by Dowel)
So the whole idea with that is that perpendicular forces cannot act against each other, this bit is quite a simple concept, it's similar to how if you walk directly north you don't move any amount east or west.

now you have to apply this to forces, a horizontal force has no vertical component and vice versa, therefore they do not interact.

Back to the east west analogy, if you walk at an angle you are moving partly north and partly east/west and applying this to forces means that if a force isn't acting perpendicular to another force, these forces must be interacting.

To resolve with angles, if you want the horizontal component of a force you do Fcos(angle to the horizontal) or Fsin(angle to the vertical) and vice versa for vertical components.
Vertical equilibrium just means that the overall combination of vertical forces has an overall force (resultant force) of 0, this does not mean that the object isn't moving in the horizontal plane. (same with horizontal equilibrium)
8. (Original post by Dowel)
Vertical equilibrium just means that the overall combination of vertical forces has an overall force (resultant force) of 0, this does not mean that the object isn't moving in the horizontal plane. (same with horizontal equilibrium)
Thanks a lot for this. I will attempt the question again with this in mind.

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: June 7, 2016
Today on TSR

The most controversial member on TSR?

Who do you think it is...

Uni strikes! How do they affect you?

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
Poll
Discussions on TSR

• Latest

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE