You are Here: Home

Rate constants Watch

1. I'm really struggling with this question:

So far I've written (the bit that's wrong is in italics):

Comparing experiments 1 and 2:
[O3(g)] quadruples and [C2H4(g)] stays the same.
The rate also quaruples so reaction is 1st order with respect to [O3(g)].

Experiments 3 and 2:
[O3(g)] and [C2H4(g)] doubles, the rate quadruples so the reaction is 2nd order with respect to [C2H4(g)].

The mark scheme says this is wrong and that the reaction is 1st order.

Thanks
2. (Original post by alde123)
I'm really struggling with this question:

So far I've written (the bit that's wrong is in italics):

Comparing experiments 1 and 2:
[O3(g)] quadruples and [C2H4(g)] stays the same.
The rate also quaruples so reaction is 1st order with respect to [O3(g)].

Experiments 3 and 2:
[O3(g)] and [C2H4(g)] doubles, the rate quadruples so the reaction is 2nd order with respect to [C2H4(g)].

The mark scheme says this is wrong and that the reaction is 1st order.

Thanks
Yep, so the marking scheme is correct. Your reasoning for the constant w.r.t ozone is also correct. Now, for the constant w.r.t ethene, your choice of experiment is correct. However, now comes the tricky bit. The conc. of ozone doubled, so the effect ozone would have on the rate would be that it would double as well, correct? So if you considered ozone alone, the new rate ought to have risen from 4 to 8. BUT it rose to 16, DOUBLE of 8, meaning that ethene had an effect on the rate. We doubled ethene's conc. as well, and this doubled the rate of reaction from 8 to 16, hence it is first order wrt to ethene as well.Hope this helped
3. (Original post by ssshah2)
Yep, so the marking scheme is correct. Your reasoning for the constant w.r.t ozone is also correct. Now, for the constant w.r.t ethene, your choice of experiment is correct. However, now comes the tricky bit. The conc. of ozone doubled, so the effect ozone would have on the rate would be that it would double as well, correct? So if you considered ozone alone, the new rate ought to have risen from 4 to 8. BUT it rose to 16, DOUBLE of 8, meaning that ethene had an effect on the rate. We doubled ethene's conc. as well, and this doubled the rate of reaction from 8 to 16, hence it is first order wrt to ethene as well.Hope this helped
Thank you so, so much! You are literally a genius!
4. (Original post by alde123)
Thank you so, so much! You are literally a genius!
lol wouldn't say that, but I am glad to help

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: June 17, 2016
Today on TSR

Half of the top 10 aren't even RG...

My alarm went off in an exam!

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• Poll
Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE