Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

VM393 – Flood Defences Motion 2016 watch

  • View Poll Results: Do you agree with this motion?
    As many are of the opinion, Aye
    57.14%
    On the contrary, No
    20.41%
    Abstain
    22.45%

    • Wiki Support Team
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    VM393 – Flood Defences Motion 2016, Quamquam123 MP
    This House believes that the Government should invest more money in flood defences.

    In recent weeks, France and Germany have been hit badly by flooding. Defences along the Seine and Rhine simply could not cope with the amount of rainfall and were inadequate. Fortunately, we did not experience the same levels of rainfall but if we did, we too could have experienced severe flooding problems.

    Flooding on the Somerset Levels of 2013-14 highlighted the devastating effects that can arise when the defences in place are substandard. Some money has already been invested in improving flood defences around the country but this is nowhere near enough to protect all the vulnerable settlements that are located near bodies of water. In addition to this, some of the money that has been set aside is wasted due to a lack of knowledge of how flooding occurs.

    Some of the main flood defences that would be installed are embankments, flood walls, river straightening and afforestation. Some of these have multiple uses. For example, embankments can be used to prevent people from falling in the river and afforestation can create habitats for wildlife.

    Our country has had the five wettest years since 2000. Despite this, the Environment Agency's funding for maintaining flood defences has been cut by 14%. Annual flood and storm damage costs are approximately £1.1bn but this figure will continue to rise if new defences aren't installed. The amount of households at significant risk of flood damage will rise from 330,000 now to 570,000 in 2035. In addition to this, a 10-60% increase in extreme rainfall could lead to a quadrupling of flooding in urban areas.

    New and improved flood defences could cost in the region of £100 - 150 million. The Environment Agency has said that for every £1 spent on flood defences, you save up to £8 in the future. Using the flood protection scheme in Wokingham, a standard flood defence operation, we can estimate the economic benefit that new flood defences across the country would bring. For the Wokingham project, £3.5 million was invested and it is predicted that it will payback £14 million in the long-run.
    However, flood defences should only be installed in areas where the financial cost of the land and industries located there exceeds the cost of defences. The Environment Agency would identify the pockets of land that are in need of defences the most and the money would be invested into protecting those areas.

    If we are to prevent, or at least significantly reduce the risk of flooding, it is imperative that the Government invests more money in flood defences and ensures it spends the money wisely.
    • TSR Support Team
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    TSR Support Team
    Why is this now a private submission?
    • Wiki Support Team
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    (Original post by The Financier)
    Why is this now a private submission?
    We came of the opinion that the work done by preceding TSR governments did address, to a very large extent, the concerns raised by this motion. However the right honourable member felt, in his personal view, that more should be done - an admirable position, of course.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Reluctant aye. Something should've been added to the text to address the previous Govt's changes
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    And now we see QQ as expected trying to attack the government for not doing something that has been done and instead we should simply waste money.
    • Study Helper
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Study Helper
    Welcome Squad
    I've been having technical issues, Mr speaker, my vote should be aye.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Wiki Support Team
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    (Original post by Andy98)
    I've been having technical issues, Mr speaker, my vote should be aye.
    One Aye has been added for seat 46.
    • Wiki Support Team
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    Ayes to the right: 28
    Noes to the left: 10
    Abstentions: 11

    The Ayes have it! The Ayes have it! Unlock!

    Turnout: 98%
 
 
 
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: July 1, 2016
Poll
Do you agree with the PM's proposal to cut tuition fees for some courses?
Useful resources

Articles:

Debate and current affairs forum guidelines

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.