Fraid so, particularly when it comes to my greatest/most pro-social work (e.g. integrative physiology research/writing has had me skipping meals and **** in the past)
Presumably you're smart enough, and well nformed enough (e.g. under my tutorage), to know what the undertones are/intent is here
Never in doubt, but if you're honest with yourself you know full well that had you not made an effort to do so then some of these guys would have sought to capitalise on a female in a position of vulnerability
Sometimes that's reasonable, other times hopeful, and in some cases arguably deliberately blinkered
Must work on some people. Truth is, when I’m coaching my guys I tell them that a moderate air of indifference/entitlement can be highly alluring, but you have to: A) Be able to back it up with something; B) Carry it off with aplomb
Nowt wrong in that, so long as A + B are satisfied (granted, they probably aren’t with most of these tools)
Douche factor 5
The world has taught them that they’re special/desirable, by simple virtue of being employed in a relatively richly rewarded sector (in pecuniary terms, at least). Poor fools get lost in their own superficial myth, and sucked into this pseudo-masculine form of arrogant misogyny that flatters them not. I’d a friend who works for Goldmans, and what she described made the caricature seem relatively mild tbh
Naw, ickle cats and newts
Maybe you’ll find out
Remind me how old you are again?
Might make you think twice..