Two men kidnap priest, take hostages in church near the French Rouen

so you can't prove your claim then (an adult would have simply admitted the rhetoric they used was wrong)

i don't need to prove the claim

Actually no I don't. Only an ignorant moron who doesn't know anything about punjab would dispute that claim.

My argument was religious people often do things that go against their religion. It doesn't need to be "proven", Bacon Boy.

But it is true. Go to a random village in Punjab and survey. I know it must be hard for you to acknowledge that humans other than Muslims tend to put cultural practices over religion, but it's true

Go to a random village in Punjab and survey. I know it must be hard for you to acknowledge that humans other than Muslims tend to put cultural practices over religion, but it's true

i don't need to prove the claim with figures when statistics from that corrupt country don't reflect the scale of the issues.

Go ask a punjabi sikh, Bacon Boy.

Actually yes you do. You make a claim if challenged you should be able to prove it otherwise it looks like you are simply making **** up

And stop being so childish as it does complete undermine any argument you have (not that you have one mind)

Then you will have no difficulty in providing evidence that
"Most sikhs in india commit female infactcide"

Go to a random village in Punjab and survey. I know it must be hard for you to acknowledge that humans other than Muslims tend to put cultural practices over religion, but it's true I am well aware that both Sikhs and Hindus commit female infanticide, but that is not what you said. You made a very specific claim. A claim that is clearly not true. Simply mathematically, if nothing else. If your claim was true, there would be few female Sikhs in India. However, the male and female populations are similar, with only a slight skew to the male (52%-48%) - what you would expect from gender-selective abortion and occasional infanticide.

The National Crime Records Bureau recorded a figure of 100 cases of infanticide in 2010. The Sikh population is 19 million. The average birth rate gives about 4 million Sikhs born every year, with the average family having 3 children. Even if only 1 in 3 children are female, if most Sikhs commit female infanticide (as you claim), there should be a skew of 30% and over 1 million cases.

You are simply wrong.
Again.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-punjab-tops-list-of-female-foeticide-cases-rajasthan-second-1323987

Most Sikhs also accept dowry from girls' parents, despite its prohibition in Sikhism.

I'm a Punjabi Sikh. QE2 is right; while female foeticide is one of the most widespread social evils in India, the claim that "most Sikhs in India commit female foeticide" is absolutely wrong.

France is close to boiling point i think.

Germany seems to have caught up pretty quick as well.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Most sikhs in india commit female infactcide.

Only an ignorant moron who doesn't know anything about punjab would dispute that claim..

They weren't contradictory. They apply in different situations.

I've looked into their justifications and found them to contradict the teachings of Islam as its preached by the scholars and practised by Muslims historically.

He'd probably feel more at home with whichever group was giving precedence to the inner mysticism than the outer, cherry-pickers who ignore explicit commands.

The attacks are becoming an almost daily occurrence now :s

The attacks are becoming an almost daily occurrence now :s

In Islam, actually, the majority of the scholars are a source of guidance. Ever heard of the term Ijma?

And I'm not saying Ibn Kathir contradicted himself at all!

Hey Dima you're a Sikh? Do you think they could be targeted by a islamic attack? I understand the message of attacking Christianity in the west but im also aware of the tensions between muslims with Sikhs and Hindus or am i over inflating the tension?

Posted from TSR Mobile

anyone who thinks that murdering elderly priests is pleasing to God is ****ed up to the max.

Most incidents are not reported, Bacon Boy.

Actually no I don't. Only an ignorant moron who doesn't know anything about punjab would dispute that claim.

My argument was religious people often do things that go against their religion. It doesn't need to be "proven", Bacon Boy.

they (ISIS) are obeying explicit commands.
5:33 is explicit that opponents of Islam can be crucified
Several verses and hadith allow the use of female captives for sex.
"What Allah has made halal, no man can make haram"

I'm a Punjabi Sikh. QE2 is right; while female foeticide is one of the most widespread social evils in India, the claim that "most Sikhs in India commit female foeticide" is absolutely wrong.