So many people have told me that at Oxbridge interviews, a graph question is more than likely to come up. I was doing some practice on rational functions and I am fine with that but then I came across
and had no idea how to sketch it. I used a graph sketcher to see what it looked like but I couldn't work out how to get it and couldn't find any youtube tutorials.
These ones also gave me a trouble:
If anyone can give me a general framework to go about sketching these, it would help massively
Sorry for the bad formatting lol
x
Turn on thread page Beta

hellomynameisr
 Follow
 9 followers
 9 badges
 Send a private message to hellomynameisr
 Thread Starter
Offline9ReputationRep: Follow
 1
 30072016 22:53

 Follow
 2
 30072016 23:00
First of all try to figure out if the function is odd, even or neither.
To do that, check if f(x) = f(x). If that's the case, then the positive part of the function is a mirror image of the negative part. If f(x) =  f(x) then the positive part is identical to the negative part but reflected over the x axis. If none of the above is true, then the function behaves differently on either ends of the yaxis.
Secondly, you notice that sinx is a sinusoidal function, that varies between positive and negative. Therefore, as x increases above zero, you f(x) will take positive and negative values sinusoidally. However, you also notice that sin(x) is actually multiplied by e^x, which means that the peaks of the sine curve increase as x increases, so you get a wave that grows on the positive end of the graph.
Thirdly, you check the negative part, is it going to be similar? Well, returning to point 1, if you plug in f(x), you get e^x * sin(x) = e^x*sin(x)
As you can see, the graph is neither even nor odd. So you expect it to behave differently on the negative end.
Why's that, you should ask. Well, if you look at the graph of e^x, as x becomes more negative, e^x falls in value, but always remains positive. So you fundamentally you still have a sine curve, but the peaks keep falling in height because you're multiplying by smaller numbers ( e^x) as you go the negative end of the xaxis.
Fourthly, you can try to figure out where the graph meets the xaxis, that's really simple, it's basically the values of x where sin(x) is zero.

As for the rest of your questions, try what we just did. However, notice that if f(x) = x cosx, then f(x) = (x) cos(x) =  x cosx =  f(x) so the function is odd, i.e. the negative bit is just a mirror image of the positive bit over the y axis.
See image:Last edited by oShahpo; 30072016 at 23:03. 
hellomynameisr
 Follow
 9 followers
 9 badges
 Send a private message to hellomynameisr
 Thread Starter
Offline9ReputationRep: Follow
 3
 30072016 23:10
(Original post by oShahpo)
First of all try to figure out if the function is odd, even or neither.
To do that, check if f(x) = f(x). If that's the case, then the positive part of the function is a mirror image of the negative part. If f(x) =  f(x) then the positive part is identical to the negative part but reflected over the x axis. If none of the above is true, then the function behaves differently on either ends of the yaxis.
Secondly, you notice that sinx is a sinusoidal function, that varies between positive and negative. Therefore, as x increases above zero, you f(x) will take positive and negative values sinusoidally. However, you also notice that sin(x) is actually multiplied by e^x, which means that the peaks of the sine curve increase as x increases, so you get a wave that grows on the positive end of the graph.
Thirdly, you check the negative part, is it going to be similar? Well, returning to point 1, if you plug in f(x), you get e^x * sin(x) = e^x*sin(x)
As you can see, the graph is neither even nor odd. So you expect it to behave differently on the negative end.
Why's that, you should ask. Well, if you look at the graph of e^x, as x becomes more negative, e^x falls in value, but always remains positive. So you fundamentally you still have a sine curve, but the peaks keep falling in height because you're multiplying by smaller numbers ( e^x) as you go the negative end of the xaxis.
Fourthly, you can try to figure out where the graph meets the xaxis, that's really simple, it's basically the values of x where sin(x) is zero.

As for the rest of your questions, try what we just did. However, notice that if f(x) = x cosx, then f(x) = (x) cos(x) =  x cosx =  f(x) so the function is odd, i.e. the negative bit is just a mirror image of the positive bit over the y axis.
See image:
Thank you very much 
RDKGames
 Follow
 119 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to RDKGames
 Community Assistant
Online20ReputationRep:Community Assistant Follow
 4
 30072016 23:13
(Original post by hellomynameisr)
So many people have told me that at Oxbridge interviews, a graph question is more than likely to come up. I was doing some practice on rational functions and I am fine with that but then I came across
and had no idea how to sketch it. I used a graph sketcher to see what it looked like but I couldn't work out how to get it and couldn't find any youtube tutorials.
These ones also gave me a trouble:
If anyone can give me a general framework to go about sketching these, it would help massively
Sorry for the bad formatting lol
Therefore which gives and as you can see there will be an infinite amount of stationary points but really I suggest you take the ones between which can be our critical values.
This also tells us that this is a wave type looking graphs so we have a rough idea of what it would look like.
Next see at what points the graph is 0, and this is obviously for due to sine (k is an integer). You should also set yourself a domain on which you initially graph, such as as it's with trig. Test on either side of to get an idea from which direction the graph should come from.
At this point you should have enough information as to sketch it within a reasonable domain around x=0.Last edited by RDKGames; 30072016 at 23:42. 
 Follow
 5
 30072016 23:15
(Original post by RDKGames)
When it comes to sketching functions, I already differentiate them to find any stationary points. Depending on the function, I can also find any critical points and test on either side of them to see from which direction (+/) the function is coming from.
Therefore which gives and as you can see there will be an infinite amount of stationary points but really I suggest you take the ones between which can be our critical values.
This also tells us that this is a wave type looking graphs so we have a rough idea of what it would look like.
Next see at what points the graph is 0, and this is obviously for due to sine. You should also set yourself a domain on which you initially graph, such as as it's with trig. Test on either side of to get an idea from which direction the graph should come from.
At this point you should have enough information as to sketch it within a reasonable domain around x=0. 
RDKGames
 Follow
 119 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to RDKGames
 Community Assistant
Online20ReputationRep:Community Assistant Follow
 6
 30072016 23:20
(Original post by oShahpo)
That's really unnecessary in most situations. Sometimes you have functions that are a pain to differentiate, but can very easily be understood by just playing around with the function. Testing the function at zero, infinities, obvious critical points, and so on. 
 Follow
 7
 30072016 23:22
(Original post by RDKGames)
Each to their own I suppose. I'm just used to differentiating if I believe I can and it would lead to anything meaningful. 
RDKGames
 Follow
 119 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to RDKGames
 Community Assistant
Online20ReputationRep:Community Assistant Follow
 8
 30072016 23:38
(Original post by oShahpo)
Well actually come to think about it in a lot of situations you have to differentiate to find peaks and what not, but try to avoid it as much as I can 
 Follow
 9
 31072016 00:11
(Original post by RDKGames)
Yep, though in some cases, as you said, it's best to avoid it. Like in OP's post with . The differential leads to a transcendental equation if you attempt to solve for 0 which can't be done algebraically. 
 Follow
 10
 31072016 00:17
@OP, some unsolicited advice: graph sketching does come up in Oxbridge interviews (although mine didn't have any) but it's more in the general context of having to problem solve your way through them, how to intuit or explore different characteristics of the function, it's limiting value, parity, extrema, etc...  it's a bit pointless asking for just guidelines on how to sketch functions, they're not interested in you learning a set of predetermined rules and applying that; they're interested in how you approach problems. A realistic graphsketching problem that would trip you right up is to sketch the set of points which satisfy , for positive ; rather different from what you're used to, I'd wager.
So really, I'd focus on your problem solving skills in general, if I were you, otherwise you don't stand much of a chance. 
 Follow
 11
 31072016 00:36
(Original post by Zacken)
@OP, some unsolicited advice: graph sketching does come up in Oxbridge interviews (although mine didn't have any) but it's more in the general context of having to problem solve your way through them, how to intuit or explore different characteristics of the function, it's limiting value, parity, extrema, etc...  it's a bit pointless asking for just guidelines on how to sketch functions, they're not interested in you learning a set of predetermined rules and applying that; they're interested in how you approach problems. A realistic graphsketching problem that would trip you right up is to sketch the set of points which satisfy , for positive ; rather different from what you're used to, I'd wager.
So really, I'd focus on your problem solving skills in general, if I were you, otherwise you don't stand much of a chance.
My cousin's doing NatSci and in his interview the interviewer asked him to sketch f(x) = sinx/x as well as f(x) = e^sin(x), which are both pretty standard that you could do with some base methods. But I do agree, learning by rote is a bad way to prepare for an interview at Oxbridge, if not accompanied by some solid problem solving skills learning.Last edited by oShahpo; 31072016 at 00:39. 
ODES_PDES
 Follow
 57 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to ODES_PDES
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 12
 31072016 01:24
(Original post by oShahpo)
While I agree a 100%, I still do think learning some base methods is quite helpful, especially if he's not applying to do maths.
My cousin's doing NatSci and in his interview the interviewer asked him to sketch f(x) = sinx/x as well as f(x) = e^sin(x), which are both pretty standard that you could do with some base methods. But I do agree, learning by rote is a bad way to prepare for an interview at Oxbridge, if not accompanied by some solid problem solving skills learning. 
 Follow
 13
 31072016 01:28
(Original post by ODES_PDES)
Sounds like you are grovelling to me.
I did not know that disagreeing with someone but not entirely has become a sycophantic thing to do these days. 
ODES_PDES
 Follow
 57 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to ODES_PDES
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 14
 31072016 01:30
(Original post by oShahpo)
I am merely disagreeing with the conjecture that learning some basic formulae to solving problems isn't necessarily helpful in an Oxbridge interview. I think that rote learning is definitely not a good way to go about learning mathematics, but learning some standard methods is usually helpful especially if the candidate is not applying for maths directly.
I did not know that disagreeing with someone but not entirely has become a sycophantic thing to do these days.
Sorry no dictionary 
 Follow
 15
 31072016 01:36

ODES_PDES
 Follow
 57 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to ODES_PDES
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 16
 31072016 01:46
(Original post by oShahpo)
Same meaning as grovelling if I am not mistaken 
Dalek1099
 Follow
 83 followers
 21 badges
 Send a private message to Dalek1099
Offline21ReputationRep: Follow
 17
 31072016 02:08
(Original post by hellomynameisr)
So many people have told me that at Oxbridge interviews, a graph question is more than likely to come up. I was doing some practice on rational functions and I am fine with that but then I came across
and had no idea how to sketch it. I used a graph sketcher to see what it looked like but I couldn't work out how to get it and couldn't find any youtube tutorials.
These ones also gave me a trouble:
If anyone can give me a general framework to go about sketching these, it would help massively
Sorry for the bad formatting lol 
 Follow
 18
 31072016 12:39
(Original post by oShahpo)
While I agree a 100%, I still do think learning some base methods is quite helpful, especially if he's not applying to do maths. 
hellomynameisr
 Follow
 9 followers
 9 badges
 Send a private message to hellomynameisr
 Thread Starter
Offline9ReputationRep: Follow
 19
 31072016 13:33
(Original post by Zacken)
Yep, was assuming he was applying for maths; checked his profile out and think he's applying for NatSci instead, oh well  you can disregard my advice OP, it doesn't apply anymore. :P
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Related discussions:
 Sketching the gradient functions of a given curve
 Sketching inverse hyperbolic functions
 C3 Functions curve sketching
 Sketching graphs of trig functions. Please help :(
 Sketching periodic functions
 Curve Sketching resources.
 C3 functions
 Curve Sketching
 How do I go about sketching graphs?
 FP2 curve sketching
TSR Support Team
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
This forum is supported by:
 SherlockHolmes
 Notnek
 charco
 Mr M
 TSR Moderator
 Nirgilis
 usycool1
 Changing Skies
 James A
 rayquaza17
 RDKGames
 randdom
 davros
 Gingerbread101
 Kvothe the Arcane
 TeeEff
 The Empire Odyssey
 Protostar
 TheConfusedMedic
 nisha.sri
 Reality Check
 claireestelle
 Doonesbury
 furryface12
 Amefish
 harryleavey
 Lemur14
 brainzistheword
 Rexar
 Sonechka
 LeCroissant
 EstelOfTheEyrie
 CoffeeAndPolitics
 an_atheist
 Moltenmo
 Labrador99
Updated: July 31, 2016
Share this discussion:
Tweet