Would it have been better or worse if the Stuarts had retained the throne?

Watch this thread
Grand High Witch
Badges: 6
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
Report Thread starter 5 years ago
#1
So essentially if Charles Edward Stuart had successfully deposed George II and established Stuart rule.

Better or worse than the Hanoverians?
0
reply
TercioOfParma
Badges: 18
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report 5 years ago
#2
Even if he had he probably wouldn't have lasted very long at all. So, I doubt it would have been better.
0
reply
JamesN88
Badges: 20
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
Report 5 years ago
#3
Worse since the Stuarts ruled(or tried to) as an absolute monarchy.

As above he wouldn't have lasted, once Charles I got the chop there was no going back to unchecked royal power.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Y13's - If you haven't confirmed your firm and insurance choices yet, why is that?

I am waiting until the deadline in case anything in my life changes (5)
21.74%
I am waiting until the deadline in case something else changes (e.g. exams/pandemic related concerns) (1)
4.35%
I am waiting until I can see the unis in person (4)
17.39%
I still have more questions before I make my decision (2)
8.7%
No reason, just haven't entered it yet (6)
26.09%
Something else (let us know in the thread!) (5)
21.74%

Watched Threads

View All