The world is going to tear itself apart with Islam hate

OP started off so strong, but has been completely destroyed within this thread. Never see such a finish.

And I've read the Quran, and all I can gather from it is either we live in a world of 1.6 billion poor followers of Islam, or the excessively vast majority of followers have ignored the violent parts and have made their religion compatible with the 21st century in their respective communities.

And if you're worried about x% of Muslims thinking that homosexuality should be outlawed, that's their way of life.

And I have no doubt that stabbing two Muslims outside a mosque is an Islamophobic attack, there's no point in denying it -

otherwise they would have stabbed two completely random people.

Lol what? I never compared the IRA to ISIS, I just said that they would deploy bombs instead of sending suicide attackers, LIKE the IRA.

Secondly, in contrary to your point, ISIS want a caliphate of all Muslims, so your point there isn't strong.

The Quran also forbids aggressive warfare, forbids killing female/child hostages, forbids using terror for political gain. ISIS do all of these, so your point is also refuted there.

They were not motivated by religion, take case studies of any modern terror attacker, and a 'heart-filled desire to help Islam' is never in their biography. They always do it because their lives go south and their hateful feelings which derive from this misery are concentrated by radical groups like ISIS.

Racist feelings are legitimised when you have a person in power indirectly promoting racism. It doesn't mean that racism is born into existence by the presence of this person, it means that it is amplified.

Problems caused by natives = shootings, stabbings, rape, theft, etc - all of which are done in greater number by the natives than with the immigrants. Its fundamentally bigoted to complain about the proportion of migrants causing it when our own race causes the very same problems in mass.

"Sharia Law" is a meaningless term. Nowhere is it written in stone that sharia law = hand chopping and throwing gays off roofs. Furthermore 1.6 billion Muslims are evidently non-violent, the fact that a government has violent laws put forward does not mean all Muslims are violent.

Boko haram membership is less than 10,000, Hamas is around 15,000. ISIS have a minimum of 50,000 members and up to 250,000. Try again.

Boko haram membership is less than 10,000, Hamas is around 15,000. ISIS have a minimum of 50,000 members and up to 250,000. Try again.

You can link any poll you want, but discriminating against people because of their beliefs fundamentally goes against democracy.

Wrong. Islamophobia is someone who hates/fears Islam or Muslims

Get the 'or' into your head. Islamophobia is not haters of Islam and Muslims, its haters of either of them.

Secondly, in contrary to your point, ISIS want a caliphate of all Muslims, so your point there isn't strong..

The Quran also forbids aggressive warfare,

forbids killing female/child hostages,

forbids using terror for political gain.

ISIS do all of these, so your point is also refuted there.

They were not motivated by religion, take case studies of any modern terror attacker, and a 'heart-filled desire to help Islam' is never in their biography. They always do it because their lives go south and their hateful feelings which derive from this misery are concentrated by radical groups like ISIS

Like many privileged, white, teenage, SJWs he displays a kind of ironic racism. He thinks that criticising Islam is attacking Muslims, and because he thinks that all Muslims are Brown Foreigners, they deed defending from the nasty white folk who are attacking them.

Racism and Islamophobia tend to come together. Regardless of whether Islam is a race or not, its still religious discrimination and bigotry.

take ANY case study of terrorism in the last 3 years in Europe, and almost all of them do it for political gain and not to help Islam

So, are you claiming that being anti-Islam is racist, or not. You seem confused (how unusual!)

So, if we look at ANY example of terrorism in Europe over the last 3 years, we will fing no implied of explicit religious justification?

Do you really believe this nonsense?

OK. Pick three, and we will examine them.

You've misinterpreted me. People who are racist are very often Islamophobic as well.

And I think Sadiq Khan being the mayor of London is a direct contradiction to your theory of Islam being inseparable between politics and religion.

I find it simply disgusting and a disgrace that he thinks it's ok for Muslims to have backward views. He would do great in a Middle Eastern country and he can't back himself up in his arguments.

Islamophobia is a collective term which means fear/hating Islam OR Muslims. Not 'and'.

Absolutely.
And Muslims tend to be more discriminatory in their beliefs (and actions, when they are in a majority) than all us bigoted atheists with our unjustified and unnecessary condemnation of slavery, domestic violence, gender inequality, persecution of gays and apostates, stoning adulterers, etc, etc.

You do know that Islam calls for the death of people because of their beliefs, not just discrimination? And while I know that most Muslims do not act on such calls, they still claim that they are perfect and immutable, thus providing legitimacy for those who do act on them. And by defending their position, you are also adding tacit support to Islamist extremists.

And you probably don't even realise that you're doing it.

Poor lad. And all he wanted to be was a social warrior fighting for justice. Fighting for a better world. Amen.

Wrong. Islamophobia is someone who hates/fears Islam or Muslims

Get the 'or' into your head. Islamophobia is not haters of Islam and Muslims, its haters of either of them.

1. Racist feelings are NOT legitimised when you have a person in power! Where are you getting this from? The key word is that this is still a person - biologically the same as me and you, and in this particular case, Trump has no real power to legitimise anything. He is not the president. Is he actively trying to make racism legal? No is the answer there. You yourself say that he is doing this ''indirectly'', meaning that a) this is your interpretation of what he is trying to do b) you have no proof he is promoting anything racist and are just using his reputation for the gains of your argument.
2. Sharia Law is not a meaningless term, as Muslims themselves use it to represent their way of life (usually more violent and prevalent in the Middle East)
3. It would be useful to provide sources where you get your numbers from concerning membership. ISIS does not nearly have 250k members! The more frequently found number is 25k, which does not put it significantly higher than Hamas or Boko Haram. And in this case, numbers are not everything, since we are talking about their power of influence, which is not relative to the amount of members rather influential leaders and manipulators.
4. You may deny Sharia Law's solidness, but you cannot deny its existence. Stoning is prevalent and common, and women have less rights - eg: not being able to drive, etc.
5. How do you know that 1.6billion Muslims are non-violent? Where has this figure come from? If there are no rebellions against this aforementioned way of life, and the mass of people live in these countries where the law is indirectly enforced then I think your large figure will be significantly reduced. I also see minimal shock and condemnation by your 1.6billion peaceful Muslims speaking against Sharia Law and stoning on either the news, through protests, etc.
6. I have so far heard no such cases happening in the UK: no rapings, no shootings, nothing! It is perhaps the other way around, where in France and Germany and other parts of the EU ( and America, even) the high amounts of refugees taken in this year and earlier have committed massacres and stabbings(I'm sure you know that these DO exist).