Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Should protecting the public from harm be the Government's overriding priority? Watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    No matter what means are used to protect the public from harm, i.e. deeply authoritarian measures to restrict known terror suspects, spending a lot of money on preventing homelessness and ensuring people have a enough money to live off through benefits, etc.

    Views?
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    For a second there I thought the title said "should protecting the public from haram be the Government's overriding priority?" :lolwut:
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Yes and No, they should protect their citizens obviously as they are *governing* those citizens.... But not turn into flippin' 1984 just because they need to protect people?! there should be a balance.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Gautam95)
    For a second there I thought the title said "should protecting the public from haram be the Government's overriding priority?" :lolwut:
    islamophobia
    reported
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    "yes"
    the role of the government is to defend the individual and the society from harm, be it internal or external (i.e. crime or war). that is the objective goal of the social contract - the trade of obedience to the law in return for defence.

    but from that goal, the individual should have rights that the government defends itself, lest the individual cannot defend themselves
    if the society is going to be destroyed, then to torture a citizen to extract information to divert that physical destruction ought not be legal but at least be encouraged in a situation of life or death. what is not moral is not always the necessary action.
    but ultimately, the government ought to operate alongside morality. and morality protects every single individual.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Yes, hence, Brexit should not happen
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    No, the government should represent their voters in the most classically-liberal way possible, it's the only way to keep the freedoms of the people s uninhibited as possible.

    Allow me to add a "why" to this:

    "protecting" the public can be used in all sorts of ways to harm the public and discriminate against minorities. For example: gays have a higher rate of HIV therefore we must ban being gay to help protect the public from HIV, or all terrorists are Muslims so to be safe we should lock away the Muslims. A real life example would be from WW2 in America, "our enemies are Japanese, therefore all Japanese people in America should be locked up, for public safety of course".

    As we have seen with recent terrorism public scaremongering about terrorism has lead to fewer freedoms of the people with increased surveillance. I understand it's a half-slippery slope argument, but that doesn't mean it's incorrect. Protecting the public should be a priority but public freedom should be as or more important.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    They should be doing their utmost to give people the freedom and responsibility to harm themselves. Be it through sport/work/drugs...
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Brussels sprouts
    Useful resources

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.