Whenever there is change in magnetic field, electric field is induced. The most common explanation that is found is: " If a closed loop circular conductor is placed in time varying magnetic field then current is induced as per the Faraday's Law and direction is given by Lenz's law. So, there must be electric field that cause charge carriers to move and this field is there even if there is no circular conductor. Furthermore, it's direction is always tangent to the loop of the conductor. Hence, circular electric field is induced due to changing magnetic field, field line being the circumference of the conducting loop."
Now that the position of the conductor is not unique, we can place conductor in one one position we get one field line and if we place same conductor in another position we get another field line following similar arguments. But as the position of the conductor is not unique, two field lines can be made to intersect, a contradiction.
Can this be explained in some other way?
If the electric field lines are concentric circles then what uniquely specifies their centres?
Thanks in advance.
[ Please try to explain this in the level of ALevel Physics i.e. with no knowledge of Maxwell's equations and vector calculus ]

tangotangopapa2
 Follow
 3 followers
 12 badges
 Send a private message to tangotangopapa2
 Thread Starter
Offline12ReputationRep: Follow
 1
 26082016 23:27

 Follow
 2
 28082016 03:17
That doesn't sound like a conventional explanation  there isn't a latent EMF that's still there when you take the conductor away, the EMF is generated by the interaction of charge carriers with a magnetic field... i.e. there is no EMF unless you are in some way dragging the charge carriers through the magnetic field.
maybe watch this series of four calculus free lectures and see if it makes any sense (in any case it shows you what you'll need to reproduce in A level exams so you might as well just learn it anyway)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejRJ...POUk5WIGVYBzDy 
tangotangopapa2
 Follow
 3 followers
 12 badges
 Send a private message to tangotangopapa2
 Thread Starter
Offline12ReputationRep: Follow
 3
 28082016 14:57
(Original post by Joinedup)
That doesn't sound like a conventional explanation  there isn't a latent EMF that's still there when you take the conductor away, the EMF is generated by the interaction of charge carriers with a magnetic field... i.e. there is no EMF unless you are in some way dragging the charge carriers through the magnetic field.
maybe watch this series of four calculus free lectures and see if it makes any sense (in any case it shows you what you'll need to reproduce in A level exams so you might as well just learn it anyway)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejRJ...POUk5WIGVYBzDy
I am referring to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DH7ufrkeHM 0.00 to 2:10.
What would happen if he had square shaped closed conducting loop instead of the ring?
What would be the situation if magnetic field were passing throughout the plane of paper, not just the part shown in the video.
Thank you. 
 Follow
 4
 28082016 19:31
(Original post by tangotangopapa2)
Whenever there is change in magnetic field, electric field is induced. The most common explanation that is found is: " If a closed loop circular conductor is placed in time varying magnetic field then current is induced as per the Faraday's Law and direction is given by Lenz's law. So, there must be electric field that cause charge carriers to move and this field is there even if there is no circular conductor. Furthermore, it's direction is always tangent to the loop of the conductor. Hence, circular electric field is induced due to changing magnetic field, field line being the circumference of the conducting loop."
Now that the position of the conductor is not unique, we can place conductor in one one position we get one field line and if we place same conductor in another position we get another field line following similar arguments. But as the position of the conductor is not unique, two field lines can be made to intersect, a contradiction.
Can this be explained in some other way?
If the electric field lines are concentric circles then what uniquely specifies their centres?
Thanks in advance.
[ Please try to explain this in the level of ALevel Physics i.e. with no knowledge of Maxwell's equations and vector calculus ] 
tangotangopapa2
 Follow
 3 followers
 12 badges
 Send a private message to tangotangopapa2
 Thread Starter
Offline12ReputationRep: Follow
 5
 29082016 09:54
I was looking for the explanation, if any, that does not involve curl of the vector field. Is there any purely intuitive explanation?
Thank you. 
Eimmanuel
 Follow
 5 followers
 11 badges
 Send a private message to Eimmanuel
Offline11ReputationRep: Follow
 6
 02092016 00:47
(Original post by tangotangopapa2)
Whenever there is change in magnetic field, electric field is induced. The most common explanation that is found is: " If a closed loop circular conductor is placed in time varying magnetic field then current is induced as per the Faraday's Law and direction is given by Lenz's law. So, there must be electric field that cause charge carriers to move and this field is there even if there is no circular conductor. Furthermore, it's direction is always tangent to the loop of the conductor. Hence, circular electric field is induced due to changing magnetic field, field line being the circumference of the conducting loop."
Now that the position of the conductor is not unique, we can place conductor in one one position we get one field line and if we place same conductor in another position we get another field line following similar arguments. But as the position of the conductor is not unique, two field lines can be made to intersect, a contradiction.
Can this be explained in some other way?
If the electric field lines are concentric circles then what uniquely specifies their centres?
Thanks in advance.
[ Please try to explain this in the level of ALevel Physics i.e. with no knowledge of Maxwell's equations and vector calculus ]
(1)
(An induced emf is the sum—via integration—of quantities around a closed path, where is the electric field induced by a changing magnetic flux and is a differential length vector along the path.)
and
(2)
(3)
When you look at equation (3), we know that the magnetic flux is computed using magnetic flux density dot crosssectional area or and the closed loop that is chosen for the integration in the LHS must be based on the area that you have chosen on the RHS.
If the magnetic flux is computed using a circular area, then the integration is performed on the circumference of the circle.
OR
Compare equation (1) with Ampere law
(4)
(1)
Based on equation 4, the magnetic field of a thin infinite long conducting wire flowing with current I, are the concentric circles  I hope you are not disputing it, so based on similar argument for the induced electric field associated with the induced emf should be also concentric circles.
I hope this two cents help. 
tangotangopapa2
 Follow
 3 followers
 12 badges
 Send a private message to tangotangopapa2
 Thread Starter
Offline12ReputationRep: Follow
 7
 02092016 10:26
(Original post by Eimmanuel)
If you view Faraday's law in an integral form, you "may see the reason" of why it is a closed loop and a simple closed loop is a circle.
(1)
(An induced emf is the sum—via integration—of quantities around a closed path, where is the electric field induced by a changing magnetic flux and is a differential length vector along the path.)
and
(2)
(3)
When you look at equation (3), we know that the magnetic flux is computed using magnetic flux density dot crosssectional area or and the closed loop that is chosen for the integration in the LHS must be based on the area that you have chosen on the RHS.
If the magnetic flux is computed using a circular area, then the integration is performed on the circumference of the circle.
OR
Compare equation (1) with Ampere law
(4)
(1)
Based on equation 4, the magnetic field of a thin infinite long conducting wire flowing with current I, are the concentric circles  I hope you are not disputing it, so based on similar argument for the induced electric field associated with the induced emf should be also concentric circles.
I hope this two cents help.
1) Electric field lines induced due to single magnetic field line (varying in strength) is concentric circles, i.e. exactly analogous to Ampere's Circuital law for long straight conductor. (The centre of all circles being the field line)
2) If there are few magnetic field lines (varying in strength) then the induced electric field lines are concentric circles with line of circle being the line of symmetry. (i.e. the centroid line of the magnetic field lines)
3) If there is time varying magnetic field with field lines going into infinitely large plane then there is no unique electric field line as there is no unique axis of symmetry. (Are electric field lines still circular in this case? What about their centres?)
Thank youTagged: 
 Follow
 8
 02092016 18:38
(Original post by tangotangopapa2)
Thank you so much. Really appreciate it. Correct me if I am wrong:
1) Electric field lines induced due to single magnetic field line (varying in strength) is concentric circles, i.e. exactly analogous to Ampere's Circuital law for long straight conductor. (The centre of all circles being the field line)
2) If there are few magnetic field lines (varying in strength) then the induced electric field lines are concentric circles with line of circle being the line of symmetry. (i.e. the centroid line of the magnetic field lines)
3) If there is time varying magnetic field with field lines going into infinitely large plane then there is no unique electric field line as there is no unique axis of symmetry. (Are electric field lines still circular in this case? What about their centres?)
Thank you
Consider this:
you have a thin disk of radius a with a varying magnetic field passing through it with
so for r<a
and for r>a
so these are concentric circles in the plane of the disk dying off as 1/rLast edited by langlitz; 02092016 at 18:57. 
 Follow
 9
 04092016 10:10
(Original post by Eimmanuel)
If you view Faraday's law in an integral form, you "may see the reason" of why it is a closed loop and a simple closed loop is a circle.
(1)
(An induced emf is the sum—via integration—of quantities around a closed path, where is the electric field induced by a changing magnetic flux and is a differential length vector along the path.)
and
(2)
(3)
When you look at equation (3), we know that the magnetic flux is computed using magnetic flux density dot crosssectional area or and the closed loop that is chosen for the integration in the LHS must be based on the area that you have chosen on the RHS.
If the magnetic flux is computed using a circular area, then the integration is performed on the circumference of the circle.
OR
Compare equation (1) with Ampere law
(4)
(1)
Based on equation 4, the magnetic field of a thin infinite long conducting wire flowing with current I, are the concentric circles  I hope you are not disputing it, so based on similar argument for the induced electric field associated with the induced emf should be also concentric circles.
I hope this two cents help.
Also, where is the centre of the circles of the electric field? you could put a circular conductor anywhere but surely if there's nothing there, where will be centre be?
tangotangopapa2Last edited by lawlieto; 04092016 at 10:12. 
 Follow
 10
 04092016 16:02
One possible source of confusion is that you're not considering physicallypossible magnetic fields.
Remember that the magnetic field is a solenoidal field, i.e. it has the form "curl(B) = something" (Ampere's law), and that it has no divergence (Gauss's law for magnetism). That means the magnetic field lines must form closed loops. Your thought experiments are leaving you confused because none of them use such a field (e.g. single field line, or infinite and parallel field lines). These fields would indeed cause some problems in electromagnetism!
When the magnetic field lines have closed loops, it is much easier to visualise why the electric field that is generated is in concentric circles around a welldefined axis.
By the way, that definition at the start of this thread is slightly ropey. Faraday's law connects the induced electric field to the change in magnetic field, and says nothing about current. If a conductor of any shape happens to exist inside that induced electric field, then you'll probably get currents flowing, but not necessarily in circular paths.Last edited by mik1a; 04092016 at 16:04. 
Eimmanuel
 Follow
 5 followers
 11 badges
 Send a private message to Eimmanuel
Offline11ReputationRep: Follow
 11
 06092016 04:12
(Original post by tangotangopapa2)
Thank you so much. Really appreciate it. Correct me if I am wrong:
1) Electric field lines induced due to single magnetic field line (varying in strength) is concentric circles, i.e. exactly analogous to Ampere's Circuital law for long straight conductor. (The centre of all circles being the field line)
2) If there are few magnetic field lines (varying in strength) then the induced electric field lines are concentric circles with line of circle being the line of symmetry. (i.e. the centroid line of the magnetic field lines)
3) If there is time varying magnetic field with field lines going into infinitely large plane then there is no unique electric field line as there is no unique axis of symmetry. (Are electric field lines still circular in this case? What about their centres?)
Thank you
I would like to add a few points to your point 1 and 3.
When field (vector field to be more precise in this example) is considered in Physics, it means a region of space ..... Can we have a magnetic field confined to a mathematical line region? I am not sure.
If the timevarying magnetic field extends into an infinite plane, the symmetry should be where you place your origin. In this case, (to me) one need to choose a coordinate system to make sense of it. The induced electric field should be still in the direction if the timevarying magnetic field point in the direction. The induced electric field can be found using the differential form (given by langlitz) of Faraday's law .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL3uBX68CY
OR
Look at magnetostatics in the differential form and BiotSavart law:
and
The solution of the magnetic field is BiotSavart law.
Draw the analog
and
The solution of electric field is

Eimmanuel
 Follow
 5 followers
 11 badges
 Send a private message to Eimmanuel
Offline11ReputationRep: Follow
 12
 06092016 04:33
(Original post by lawlieto)
I thought we integrate around a closed loop because the electric field is circular, not the other way around (ie the electric field isn't circular, because that's how we chose to integrate it.)
tangotangopapa2
(Original post by lawlieto)
Also, where is the centre of the circles of the electric field? you could put a circular conductor anywhere but surely if there's nothing there, where will be centre be? tangotangopapa2
Reply
Submit reply
Related discussions:
 Physics:on the move unit 4 june 2014 edexcel
 Magnetic Fields HELP
 Edexcel IAL Phy unit 4 11th june .
 AQA Physics A Unit 4 11 June 2014
 Edexcel Unit 4: Physics on the Move 6PH04 (11th June 2015)
 On the Strong Equivalence of the Elementary Charge and the ...
 AQA Physics PHYA4  20th June 2016 [Exam Discussion ...
 Edexcel Physics Unit 4  21st June 2011
 OCR Physics A G485  Frontiers of Physics  18th June 2015
 OCR B Physics G495  June 2013 Unit 5 (OFFICIAL THREAD)
TSR Support Team
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
This forum is supported by:
 charco
 Mr M
 TSR Moderator
 Nirgilis
 usycool1
 Changing Skies
 James A
 rayquaza17
 Notnek
 RDKGames
 randdom
 davros
 Gingerbread101
 Kvothe the Arcane
 The Financier
 The Empire Odyssey
 Protostar
 TheConfusedMedic
 nisha.sri
 Reality Check
 claireestelle
 Doonesbury
 furryface12
 Amefish
 harryleavey
 Lemur14
 brainzistheword
 Rexar
 Sonechka
 LeCroissant
 EstelOfTheEyrie
 CoffeeAndPolitics
 an_atheist
 Moltenmo
Updated: September 6, 2016
Share this discussion:
Tweet