# Complex integrationWatch

#1
Hi

I'm stuck with
around a) a straight line from -i to i
b) a segment of a circle from -i to i

my parametrised eq for a) is f(t)=-i+2it

Thank you
0
quote
11 years ago
#2
(Original post by Goldenratio)
Hi

I'm stuck with
around a) a straight line from -i to i
b) a segment of a circle from -i to i

my parametrised eq for a) is f(t)=-i+2it
Then |z| = |2t-1|, which is going to be a bit awkward.

I suggest you parameterize from -i to 0 and 0 to i instead.
Integral on the bit from -i to 0, f(t)=(t-1)i, |z| = 1 - t, and dz/dt = i.

So you get .

You then need to do a similar integral for the bit from 0 to i and add them together.

Does that make any sense?
0
quote
#3
Thank you! that makes sense!

I'm still a bit stuck on how you found |z|=|2t-1|? or f(t)=(t-1)i, |z| = 1 - t

0
quote
11 years ago
#4
(Original post by Goldenratio)
Thank you! that makes sense!

I'm still a bit stuck on how you found |z|=|2t-1|? or f(t)=(t-1)i, |z| = 1 - t
Well, f(t) is just z, right? So if f(t) = -i+2it (your parameterization) then |z|=|f(t)| = |-i+2it| = |2t-1|.

So what I did for my parameterization is pretty much the same, only I parameterize z=-i+it so as to go from -i to 0 as t goes from 0 to 1.
0
quote
#5
hmm It's finding the modulus of those parametrizations that i'm not quite understanding. Could you explain it a bit more please?
0
quote
11 years ago
#6
Suppose we're integrating along the straight line from -i to 0.

Parameterize it as z = f(t) = -i + it. (0<=t<=1)

Then |z| = |-i+t| = |-1+t| = |1-t| = 1-t

Meanwhile, dz/dt = i. So

So our integral becomes .

I'm not sure this is really any clearer than what I said before, so if you still don't understand, can you specify the exact part you don't follow, and I'll see if I can do better.
0
quote
#7
I was referring to finding the modulus of a parametrisation or any complex number not in the form z=x+iy.

As in our cases:

|z|=|i+it| or |e^it| or for example |it^2+t+i|

I'm not sure how i work it out, because i just thought it was the length of the curve.
0
quote
11 years ago
#8
(Original post by Goldenratio)
I was referring to finding the modulus of a parametrisation or any complex number not in the form z=x+iy.

As in our cases:

|z|=|i+it| or |e^it| or for example |it^2+t+i|

I'm not sure how i work it out, because i just thought it was the length of the curve.
It's not the length of the curve, it's the distance between z and the origin. (i.e. it's when z = x+iy).

So in the case of |-i+it| you can calculate the modulus as I did earlier, or you could, equally say you've parameterized along a straight line starting distance 1 and ending at the origin, so the modulus is just 1-t.

Similarly, for e^it you can either show the modulus is , or you can just say you're integrating along part of a circle centered at the origin with radius 1, so the modulus is 1.

I'm slightly concerned we're talking at cross-purposes, so if any of this comes across as stating the bleeding obvious, don't take it the wrong way!

0
quote
#9
No no, that was quite helpful! thank you.

In this example

it seems quite logical.

yet when we're getting the modulus of |-i+it| we don't end up with but rather which i must be misunderstanding completely
0
quote
11 years ago
#10
(Original post by Goldenratio)
No no, that was quite helpful! thank you.

In this example

it seems quite logical.

yet when we're getting the modulus of |-i+it| we don't end up with but rather which i must be misunderstanding completely
You do end up with , it's just that you need to make sure you take the positive square root. (And as -1+t < 0, that's not the obvious one).
0
quote
#11
aha! excellent!

So now i'm parametrising the circle i've got:

=1

and

hence = which is wrong
0
quote
11 years ago
#12
You haven't made it obvious how you're parameterizing, but you do realise you need to go from to ?
(i.e. the argument changes by pi, not pi/2).

Incidentally, I think the answer will depend on whether you go clockwise or anticlockwise around the circle. (Edit: Actually, I think that's not true in this case, but it's something to be aware of).
0
quote
#13
the Parameterisation I'm using is g(t)= e^i*pi/2*t where |g(t)|=1 and g'=i*pi/2*e^1*Pi/2*t

tE[0,1)
0
quote
11 years ago
#14
(Original post by Goldenratio)
the Parameterisation I'm using is g(t)= e^i*pi/2*t where |g(t)|=1 and g'=i*pi/2*e^1*Pi/2*t

tE[0,1)
Then I think your g only goes round a quarter of a circle (from 1 to i), rather than half a circle (from -i to i).
0
quote
X

new posts

Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### University open days

• University of Lincoln
Mini Open Day at the Brayford Campus Undergraduate
Wed, 19 Dec '18
• University of East Anglia
Fri, 4 Jan '19
• Bournemouth University
Wed, 9 Jan '19

### Poll

Join the discussion

Yes (281)
27.5%
No (741)
72.5%