Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

V1045 – Promissory Oaths Amendment Bill 2016 Watch

Announcements
  • View Poll Results: Should this bill be passed into law?
    As many are of the opinion, Aye
    38.30%
    On the contrary, No
    42.55%
    Abstain
    19.15%

    • Wiki Support Team
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    V1045 – Promissory Oaths Amendment Bill 2016, TSR Socialist Party

    Promissory Oaths Amendment Bill
    A bill to introduce a new Armed Forces oath and allow oaths of loyalty to constituents for MPs.

    BE IT ENACTED by The Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Commons in this present Parliament assembled, in accordance with the provisions of the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—

    Section 1 - Changes to the Oath
    • Section 2 of the Promissory Oaths Act 1868 shall be amended to add a sub-section as follows:
    Alternatively a Member of Parliament may make the alternate declaration in the form follow; that is to say;

    'I, , do swear...that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the peoples of the United Kingdom, according to their respective laws and customs; preserving inviolably their civil liberties and democratic rights of self government, through their elected representatives in the House of Commons, and will faithfully and truly declare my mind and opinion on all matters that come before me without fear or favour.'

    The MP may choose to either swear by Almighty God or Solemnly declare and affirm.
    • Section 2 will also have a specific oath of allegiance added for the Army Act 1955 and Air Force Act 1955:
    “I, , do swear...that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the Government of the United Kingdom, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, Queen Elizabeth II, and to bravely defend the rights and freedom of its people."

    Personnel may choose to either swear by Almighty God or Solemnly declare and affirm.

    Section 2 - Short Title, Commencement and Extent
    • This Act may be referred to as the Promissory Oaths Amendment Act 2016
    • This Act will come into effect at the beginning of the next parliamentary term
    • This Act extends to the United Kingdom
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Consolidates oaths into a single Act, as it allows for the Act to extend to the whole of the UK, unlike before, and introduces a new armed forces oath that clears up issues with possible army coups against the government since they swear an oath to the Queen although she is CiC the PM is de facto commander and the Ministry of Defence's importance.
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-10509742.html
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Needed to be formatted into a more clause-like fashion.

    This would also need to be amended every time the Sovereign changes.

    Nay
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DanE1998)
    Needed to be formatted into a more clause-like fashion.

    This would also need to be amended every time the Sovereign changes.

    Nay
    Which is why the relevant Act IRL still references old Vic but they say Elizabeth?
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DanE1998)
    Needed to be formatted into a more clause-like fashion.

    This would also need to be amended every time the Sovereign changes.

    Nay
    This is the way it was originally written and amended IRL, and no it wouldn't. The original RL Act refers to Victoria but they still say Elizabeth II. This is also a very left-wing/pragmatist bill so i don't know why you'd vote against it.
    • Wiki Support Team
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Airmed Am I confusing you with someone else when I think this is the sort of thing you'd support?
    • TSR Support Team
    • Peer Support Volunteers
    • Clearing and Applications Advisor
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RayApparently)
    Airmed Am I confusing you with someone else when I think this is the sort of thing you'd support?
    I don't support swearing to the Queen no matter what, but I like the idea of swearing loyalty to constituents, hence my abstain.
    • Wiki Support Team
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Airmed)
    I don't support swearing to the Queen no matter what, but I like the idea of swearing loyalty to constituents, hence my abstain.
    Oh so you don't like the Army bit - fair enough. It is a bit odd coming from the Socs, though I expect it's an attempt to bring together both left and right-wing votes (which alternatively might have ended up alienating enough left and right-wingers to prevent it's passage...).
    • TSR Support Team
    • Peer Support Volunteers
    • Clearing and Applications Advisor
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RayApparently)
    Oh so you don't like the Army bit - fair enough. It is a bit odd coming from the Socs, though I expect it's an attempt to bring together both left and right-wing votes (which alternatively might have ended up alienating enough left and right-wingers to prevent it's passage...).
    My thinking exactly. I find this a very odd Soc bill.
    • Wiki Support Team
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Airmed)
    My thinking exactly. I find this a very odd Soc bill.
    It is tricky to write a bill to poach votes from lefties and righties without making it universally unpalatable.
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Which is why you just write something marxist and steamroll it through with the almighty power of the Left. :ninja:
    • TSR Support Team
    • Peer Support Volunteers
    • Clearing and Applications Advisor
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RayApparently)
    It is tricky to write a bill to poach votes from lefties and righties without making it universally unpalatable.
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Which is why you just write something marxist and steamroll it through with the almighty power of the Left. :ninja:
    One day, perhaps that will be achieved. :moon:
    Spoiler:
    Show
    :rofl: I might be a centrist, but I think I am slowly leaning centre right. You will have to pass such a thing without my support. Unless there is tea involved. Or biscuits. Or Irish freedom. Take your pick of bribery.
    • Wiki Support Team
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Ayes to the right: 18
    Noes to the left: 20
    Abstentions: 9

    The Noes have it! The Noes have it! Unlock!

    Turnout: 94%
 
 
 
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: September 18, 2016
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Break up or unrequited love?
    Useful resources

    Articles:

    Debate and current affairs forum guidelines

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.