Join TSR now to have your say on this topicSign up now
    • Wiki Support Team
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    B1055 – Education Bill 2016, Aph MP
    A
    B I L L
    T O
    ban grammar schools and ensure pupils have a voice in the way their school is run.

    1. Grammar Schools
    1. Selecting which pupils attend your school based on academic achievement is henceforth banned in all state funded primary and secondary schools.
    2. Governors
    1. The Governing Board shall consist of at least 12 people plus the Head Teacher.
    3.Short Title etc.
    1. This Act may be cited as the Education Act 2016,
    2. shall come into force immediately following royal assent, and
    3. shall extent to the whole of England.


    notes
    Spoiler:
    Show

    The reason to ban grammar schools is that they do nothing but increase the gap between the haves and have nots, they also can tell pupils that they are stupid or a failure at the young age of 11 if they don't get in which can have negative impacts on their mental health.

    The reason for having students on the boards of governors is one of nessesity, in schools pupils often think that they are being ignored or that their views don't matter, by having them as an integral part of the school which holds the head teacher to account and they can represent students more effectively
    • Very Important Poster
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Saracen's Fez)
    B1055 – Education Bill 2016, TSR Socialist Party
    A
    B I L L
    T O
    ban grammar schools and ensure pupils have a voice in the way their school is run.

    1. Grammar Schools
    1. Selecting which pupils attend your school based on academic achievement is henceforth banned in all state funded primary and secondary schools.
    2. Governors
    1. The Governing Board shall consist of at least 12 people plus the Head Teacher.
    3.Short Title etc.
    1. This Act may be cited as the Education Act 2016,
    2. shall come into force immediately following royal assent, and
    3. shall extent to the whole of England.


    notes
    Spoiler:
    Show

    The reason to ban grammar schools is that they do nothing but increase the gap between the haves and have nots, they also can tell pupils that they are stupid or a failure at the young age of 11 if they don't get in which can have negative impacts on their mental health.

    The reason for having students on the boards of governors is one of nessesity, in schools pupils often think that they are being ignored or that their views don't matter, by having them as an integral part of the school which holds the head teacher to account and they can represent students more effectively
    Sorry, I probably should've been clearer by this is a PMB not a socialist bill.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Why not go one step further and stop college's and universities looking at academic achievements?

    Once again Mental health used to push a bill, when is it the correct time not to get told you are the best at 18 year old after you have been told all your life how amazing you are despite being average?
    • Wiki Support Team
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Aph)
    Sorry, I probably should've been clearer by this is a PMB not a socialist bill.
    A bit clearer? Leaving "Socialist Party" out of the field would have been a good start!
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Hahahahahahahahahahahaha, classic Aph.
    • Community Assistant
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Nay, for the reasons that I expressed in the Socialist sub. The problem with grammar schools is rich parents cheating the system and paying for comprehensive tuition to get their kids into schools they're too dumb for. I'd know - I go to a grammar school where about 75% of the students aren't intelligent enough to be there. Fix that problem and grammar schools will start enabling social mobility as they were originally intended to do.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by cranbrook_aspie)
    Nay, for the reasons that I expressed in the Socialist sub. The problem with grammar schools is rich parents cheating the system and paying for comprehensive tuition to get their kids into schools they're too dumb for. I'd know - I go to a grammar school where about 75% of the students aren't intelligent enough to be there. Fix that problem and grammar schools will start enabling social mobility as they were originally intended to do.
    Trivially false, especially with the way the exam system works.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    To be fair, you would probably get more sense from the brats on the governing board (spare me) than the author of this bill.

    Utterly ridiculous.
    • Community Assistant
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jammy Duel)
    Trivially false, especially with the way the exam system works.
    Maybe not quite that figure but I'm reminded every day that it's not false. It's a real problem.
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    The bill doesn't specifically state pupils must be named governors...
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by cranbrook_aspie)
    Maybe not quite that figure but I'm reminded every day that it's not false. It's a real problem.
    If somebody isn't intelligent enough to do something doesn't matter how much tuition they get, they cannot do it. And anyway, the simplest solution is to increase places, not decrease them as some wish to do.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    I don't support this, grammar schools are fine and schools should be able to decide for themselves how they're governed.
    • Political Ambassador
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    19
    I don't support this.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Nay.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Nay.

    I'd rather see an attempt to make grammar schools better suited to aid social mobility and allow those who before couldn't get a good education, a good education.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by cranbrook_aspie)
    Nay, for the reasons that I expressed in the Socialist sub. The problem with grammar schools is rich parents cheating the system and paying for comprehensive tuition to get their kids into schools they're too dumb for. I'd know - I go to a grammar school where about 75% of the students aren't intelligent enough to be there. Fix that problem and grammar schools will start enabling social mobility as they were originally intended to do.
    exactly the same for me.

    nay.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jammy Duel)
    If somebody isn't intelligent enough to do something doesn't matter how much tuition they get, they cannot do it. And anyway, the simplest solution is to increase places, not decrease them as some wish to do.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    I also go to a grammar school and since the tests to get in are based on basic maths and verbal reasoning, it is very possible that students with the financial ability to do so can just be tutored up to their eyeballs to get a place. There are only a few of us in our year who were not tutored (naturally it becomes very clear who was when they start asking more difficult questions).

    I do, however, agree that more places are needed.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    School governors should be the subject of a separate debate and Bill and I am not sure that one model fits all size of school.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Nay,

    I took the 11 plus and failed by a hair length, I am not bitter about it. The reason I didn't get in was because I wasn't really that interested so when it came to preparing for the tests I was playing pokemon on my gameboy advance instead. At my primary school, the headteacher paid for her son's private tuition for a year prior to his 11 plus and he got in. I remember because she suggested to my mum that she should do the same for me.

    Grammar schools don't aid social mobility at the moment, the majority of grammar school students come from middle class families where parents can afford some private tuition to get their children in but can't afford a place for their children at a private school.

    There are many solutions to this issue, the best one that I can think of is to continue to build new grammar schools but include 11 plus preparation in comprehensive primary education to actually level the playing field without giving anyone a hand out.



    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jammy Duel)
    If somebody isn't intelligent enough to do something doesn't matter how much tuition they get, they cannot do it.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Surely the current RL cabinet shows proof counter to this

    Posted from TSR Mobile
 
 
 
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: October 2, 2016
Poll
If you won £30,000, which of these would you spend it on?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.