Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Confused with mass number and relative mass Watch

Announcements
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    I understand that they have different meanings but I dont get why they are the same on the periodic table? I'm really confused
    (I meant relative atomic mass)
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    I think it's because technically, electrons have a teenie weenie bit of mass, but in relative terms it gets ignored because of how insignificant it is.

    So Mass Number is only the number of protons + neutrons where as Relative Mass is the mass of Protons (1) + Neutrons (1) + Electrons (an insignificant number)
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zargabaath)
    I think it's because technically, electrons have a teenie weenie bit of mass, but in relative terms it gets ignored because of how insignificant it is.

    So Mass Number is only the number of protons + neutrons where as Relative Mass is the mass of Protons (1) + Neutrons (1) + Electrons (an insignificant number)
    Sory I meant Ar - weighted average mass of element compaed to a 12th of c-12
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by shohaib712)
    Sory I meant Ar - weighted average mass of element compaed to a 12th of c-12
    I'm not totally sure what you're asking
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zargabaath)
    I'm not totally sure what you're asking
    I mean: why do we not have mass number on the periodic table?
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by shohaib712)
    I mean: why do we not have mass number on the periodic table?
    I assume it's because it's just not very useful. Have you ever used Mass Number for any calculation before? I'm sure at higher levels in more specialised areas it's used, but for most things Atomic Number and Relative Mass are the only things required.

    It's also possible to work out based off what you're already given on the table. It's also why you don't have an electron number on the table.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by shohaib712)
    I understand that they have different meanings but I dont get why they are the same on the periodic table? I'm really confused
    (I meant relative atomic mass)
    It's actually due to the isotopes and their abundance. You know that elements such as hydrogen,carbon etc have different isotopes and the abundance of each is different. When we calculate the Relative Atomic Mass, we take the product of the mass of each isotope and the abundance then divide by 100 because the abundance is given in percentages. The answer you get will not exactly be the same but it will be close to the atomic mass. For example, for carbon, you may get a value like 12.sth.(I'm not aware of the value lol) but you'll get something in decimals. That answer is rounded off to 12. This makes it nearly the same as the atomic mass so I guess, RAM is used for more accuracy.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sabahshahed294)
    It's actually due to the isotopes and their abundance. You know that elements such as hydrogen,carbon etc have different isotopes and the abundance of each is different. When we calculate the Relative Atomic Mass, we take the product of the mass of each isotope and the abundance then divide by 100 because the abundance is given in percentages. The answer you get will not exactly be the same but it will be close to the atomic mass. For example, for carbon, you may get a value like 12.sth.(I'm not aware of the value lol) but you'll get something in decimals. That answer is rounded off to 12. This makes it nearly the same as the atomic mass so I guess, RAM is used for more accuracy.
    So you can find the mass n.o. only for isotopes and for atoms, you need to round up the r.a.m?
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by shohaib712)
    So you can find the mass n.o. only for isotopes and for atoms, you need to round up the r.a.m?
    I'm sorry, I didn't get you?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zargabaath)
    I assume it's because it's just not very useful. Have you ever used Mass Number for any calculation before? I'm sure at higher levels in more specialised areas it's used, but for most things Atomic Number and Relative Mass are the only things required.

    It's also possible to work out based off what you're already given on the table. It's also why you don't have an electron number on the table.
    lol this makes so much sense!! So bassically if there ever was a question regading the use of mass number, they would give us the isotope formula in the question? (giving the maas numbe with it)

    Oh and can you clear this up:
    Mass number + Ar are different
    you can only get it from an isotopes Ir at 1.d.p? (cuz mass of neutron= n.o of neutron cuz its 1u)

    Sorry for the questions - I went through this very easily a few weeks ago but I'm just self doubting myself a lot. Sorry.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Break up or unrequited love?
    Help with your A-levels

    All the essentials

    The adventure begins mug

    Student life: what to expect

    What it's really like going to uni

    Rosette

    Essay expert

    Learn to write like a pro with our ultimate essay guide.

    Uni match

    Uni match

    Our tool will help you find the perfect course for you

    Study planner

    Create a study plan

    Get your head around what you need to do and when with the study planner tool.

    Study planner

    Resources by subject

    Everything from mind maps to class notes.

    Hands typing

    Degrees without fees

    Discover more about degree-level apprenticeships.

    A student doing homework

    Study tips from A* students

    Students who got top grades in their A-levels share their secrets

    Study help links and info

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threadsRules and posting guidelines

    Sponsored content:

    HEAR

    HEAR

    Find out how a Higher Education Achievement Report can help you prove your achievements.

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.