username2183021
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#1
I'll be doing biochemistry at Warwick. When I was applying for university, biochem at Warwick didn't have amazing employment data on unistats. Good, but not as good as other universities above Warwick in the league tables.

Recently my course's data has improved greatly. From 65% pro. employment to 85% pro. employment, and 25% of people achieving a first class degree to 55% along with other improvements.

Now my course beats places like UCL, Bristol, Exeter and York for employment and satisfaction, all above Warwick in the league tables, which I'm suspicious about. Why has such a huge jump occurred in just a year? Did Warwick neglect to update their stats or are they manipulating data?
0
reply
alleycat393
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#2
Report 4 years ago
#2
Warwick doesn't update unistats. Unistats is an independent organisation as far as I know and is based on student reviews. League tables take into account a number of factors that the unis publish but still calculate rankings in a number of different ways. The bottom line is that Warwick is a good uni and if you find the course interesting don't worry about either league tables or unistats.
1
reply
Joinedup
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#3
Report 4 years ago
#3
Could be a fairly small number of graduates from that exact pathway - which would mean that the stats are liable to swing wildly from year to year. IIRC unistats used to show the course size (and other data like gender ratio) but that's been removed.

going from 65% to 85% employment is more significant if there's 100 graduates than if there's 20... plus the job market might just have improved.

unistats is a government site, The professional employment figure is IIRC based on telephone survey of graduates carried out by the uni - the question asked is whether you needed the degree to get your current job.
0
reply
Helpmeoutplease
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#4
Report 4 years ago
#4
I have encountered the same problem with unistats. I want to study biochem at imperial which is a highly regarded university in many tables but on unistats it has percentages far below other universities, some being lower than 50%.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Should there be a new university admissions system that ditches predicted grades?

No, I think predicted grades should still be used to make offers (579)
34.32%
Yes, I like the idea of applying to uni after I received my grades (PQA) (693)
41.08%
Yes, I like the idea of receiving offers only after I receive my grades (PQO) (338)
20.04%
I think there is a better option than the ones suggested (let us know in the thread!) (77)
4.56%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed