Join TSR now and get all your revision questions answeredSign up now

Global Politics

    • Thread Starter

    Hi there
    I am ever so stuck on this question: What are the implications of bipolarity?

    So far, I have the following....

    Emerging after WW2, bipolarity is a term that has been referred to by Vasquez and Henham(1999), as two major power blocs which hold the majority of economic and military influence within a certain region . this can most commonly be associated with the cold war era which had two separate spheres of control, the USA and the USSR. However, despite the shift in power from a bipolar world to a unipolar world, there has been a long standing debate amongst new realists and liberals as to whether or not a bipolar world ensures safety, peace and stability. And some, such as Kenneth Waltz, believe that even though the Soviet Union has collapsed, the world still remains, bipolar.

    "Firstly, bipolarity allows for the ‘balance of powers’. Waltz believed that all states want to gain political dominance and thus must rely on internal balancing(both militarily and economically) in order to produce their own security and become a great power. This in turn allowed for stability and reduced competition as countries such as the USA became the world’s policeman and no longer had to worry about the threat of Germany or any other western country. However, bipolarity does not ensure world order at all, since permanent equilibrium is unattainable due to a difference in economies and resources such as the capacity of a country’s military. This means that war is inevitable and war also becomes the necessary solution for problems between superpowers. Yet, Waltz believes that such wars are not a product of ‘the balance of powers’, but rather are a product of miscalculation, i.e, states misjudging each other’s power.

    Bipolarity ensures stability. This is highlighted by China which was able to “reverse its alignment twice during the Cold War” (Gaddis 1986). However, due to the two tiered system both the US and the USSR were able to adapt to the change"

    BUT...I need a few more implications and some examples. Could I please have some help?

    Sorry you've not had any responses about this. Are you sure you've posted in the right place? Here's a link to our subject forum which should help get you more responses if you post there.

    Just quoting in Danny Dorito so she can move the thread if needed :wizard:
    (Original post by Danny Dorito)
Do you have exam superstitions?
Help with your A-levels

All the essentials

The adventure begins mug

Student life: what to expect

What it's really like going to uni


Essay expert

Learn to write like a pro with our ultimate essay guide.

Uni match

Uni match

Our tool will help you find the perfect course for you

Study planner

Create a study plan

Get your head around what you need to do and when with the study planner tool.

Study planner

Resources by subject

Everything from mind maps to class notes.

Hands typing

Degrees without fees

Discover more about degree-level apprenticeships.

A student doing homework

Study tips from A* students

Students who got top grades in their A-levels share their secrets

Study help links and info

Can you help? Study help unanswered threadsRules and posting guidelines

Sponsored content:



Find out how a Higher Education Achievement Report can help you prove your achievements.

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.