Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

# maffs question Watch

Announcements
1. Try binomial expansion.
2. Try expanding it
3. (Original post by donutellme)
Try binomial expansion.
is there no other way of doing it? i mean that would take long to do, no?
4. (Original post by KloppOClock)
is there no other way of doing it? i mean that would take long to do, no?
Well you only need to expand things that would result in x^2 s so it shouldn't no
5. (Original post by KloppOClock)
is there no other way of doing it? i mean that would take long to do, no?
I assume you know basics of expanding to the degree that it's quite natural. Just discard any terms where the power of x gets greater than 2, and only treat it as if it includes those terms, e.g. 3x(2x(2x^2 + x + 3) goes to 4x^3+2x^2+6x so discard x^3 so you have 3x(2x^2+6x) and so 6x^3+18x^2 and therefore 18x^2
6. (Original post by donutellme)
I assume you know basics of expanding to the degree that it's quite natural. Just discard any terms where the power of x gets greater than 2
theres 3 terms tho, i mean i assume i factorise it? but when i did that and then expanded i still got it wrong
7. (Original post by KloppOClock)
theres 3 terms tho, i mean i assume i factorise it? but when i did that and then expanded i still got it wrong

I assume you know basics of expanding to the degree that it's quite natural. Just discard any terms where the power of x gets greater than 2, and only treat it as if it includes those terms, e.g. 3x(2x(2x^2 + x + 3) goes to 4x^3+2x^2+6x so discard x^3 so you have 3x(2x^2+6x) and so 6x^3+18x^2 and therefore 18x^2
8. (Original post by donutellme)
I assume you know basics of expanding to the degree that it's quite natural. Just discard any terms where the power of x gets greater than 2, and only treat it as if it includes those terms, e.g. 3x(2x(2x^2 + x + 3) goes to 4x^3+2x^2+6x so discard x^3 so you have 3x(2x^2+6x) and so 6x^3+18x^2 and therefore 18x^2
yah u already typed that
9. (Original post by KloppOClock)
theres 3 terms tho, i mean i assume i factorise it? but when i did that and then expanded i still got it wrong
Just get the square bracket up to a term of from binomial expansion or otherwise then expand the two.
10. (Original post by KloppOClock)
yah u already typed that
Yeah sorry haha

Basically, do that method on each of the inside brackets first, then combine them, then do it with the outside bracket, then combine them.
11. Okay I got the right answer but surely im not doing this the correct way?

So the second part of the bracket can not have any coefficients of x so I just have to expand the first one, so it goes:
just considering coefficents of upto x^2

(1+2x+3x^2)(1+2x+3x^2) = 10x^2+4x+1
(1+4x+10x^2)(1+2x+3x^2) = 21x^2+6x+1
(1+2x+3x^2) ( 21x^2+6x+1) = (36x^2+8x+1)
(1+2x+3x^2) (36x^2+8x+1) = 55x^2+20x^2+3x^2 =78x^2

as the 1 will cancel out with the -1 i only need to work out 78*4 to find the coefficient, which gets the correct answer of 312

I mean, surely there is a much quicker way of doing this?
12. (Original post by KloppOClock)
Okay I got the right answer but surely im not doing this the correct way?

So the second part of the bracket can not have any coefficients of x so I just have to expand the first one, so it goes:
just considering coefficents of upto x^2

(1+2x+3x^2)(1+2x+3x^2) = 10x^2+4x+1
(1+4x+10x^2)(1+2x+3x^2) = 21x^2+6x+1
(1+2x+3x^2) ( 21x^2+6x+1) = (36x^2+8x+1)
(1+2x+3x^2) (36x^2+8x+1) = 55x^2+20x^2+3x^2 =78x^2

as the 1 will cancel out with the -1 i only need to work out 78*4 to find the coefficient, which gets the correct answer of 312

I mean, surely there is a much quicker way of doing this?
That seems about right. You can eliminate even more possibilities by sight, but that comes by experience.
13. (Original post by donutellme)
That seems about right. You can eliminate even more possibilities by sight, but that comes by experience.
how am i meant to do that in under 3 minutes without a calculator, it took me like 5 just to write out the answer, smh
14. (Original post by KloppOClock)
how am i meant to do that in under 3 minutes without a calculator, it took me like 5 just to write out the answer, smh
I'll try it tomorrow for myself and time it and show you my working if you like? Practice will make you better.
15. (Original post by KloppOClock)
Okay I got the right answer but surely im not doing this the correct way?

So the second part of the bracket can not have any coefficients of x so I just have to expand the first one, so it goes:
just considering coefficents of upto x^2

(1+2x+3x^2)(1+2x+3x^2) = 10x^2+4x+1
(1+4x+10x^2)(1+2x+3x^2) = 21x^2+6x+1
(1+2x+3x^2) ( 21x^2+6x+1) = (36x^2+8x+1)
(1+2x+3x^2) (36x^2+8x+1) = 55x^2+20x^2+3x^2 =78x^2

as the 1 will cancel out with the -1 i only need to work out 78*4 to find the coefficient, which gets the correct answer of 312

I mean, surely there is a much quicker way of doing this?
You didn't use the binomial expansion.

and that's as far as you need to go.

Edit: Ignoring terms that aren't relevant.
16. The answer is 312 - you are correct. But, the faster method would be to follow Ghostwalker ^

Reply
Submit reply
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: September 25, 2016
Today on TSR

### Oxbridge

Even more elitist than everyone thought?

### Physically ill after being cheated on

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• Poll
Useful resources

## Make your revision easier

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.