Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

I need help with my Alevel History Coursework. Watch

Announcements
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I've just started my Alevel history coursework and my question is "how far can Hitler be blamed for the starting of World war 2?" Anyone got any ideas where i can get good sources to argue both sides??
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by rhyscedwards2)
    I've just started my Alevel history coursework and my question is "how far can Hitler be blamed for the starting of World war 2?" Anyone got any ideas where i can get good sources to argue both sides??
    Have a look at AJP Taylor.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by rhyscedwards2)
    I've just started my Alevel history coursework and my question is "how far can Hitler be blamed for the starting of World war 2?" Anyone got any ideas where i can get good sources to argue both sides??
    As ageshallnot has said.

    The answer to the actual coursework question is that the inept European leaders at the time caused it. Good ol' Neville and Benito.
    • Very Important Poster
    Online

    19
    (Original post by jamestg)
    As ageshallnot has said.

    The answer to the actual coursework question is that the inept European leaders at the time caused it. Good ol' Neville and Benito.
    In two sentences why did they cause it and not Hitler?
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 999tigger)
    In two sentences why did they cause it and not Hitler?
    The answer is too complex for two sentences, so I'll just list reasons why...

    - LoN didn't even have America partaking
    - there was no united foreign and military policy with the LoN
    - Anglo-German Naval Agreement in 1935
    - lack of action from the Italian invasion of Abyssinia in 1935
    - talks of an Anglo-German alliance (yes the Nazis could have been on the same side as us)
    - no intervention in 1936 with reoccupation of the Rhineland
    - no intervention during Anschluss or when they took the Sudetenland
    - no intervention in the 1939 Czechoslovakia invasion
    - Non-Agression pact between Germany and USSR which literally carved up Poland just days before WW2 began
    - disunity among the nations, with Mussolini being too indecisive
    - USA declaring it would not go to war in Europe
    • Very Important Poster
    Online

    19
    (Original post by jamestg)
    The answer is too complex for two sentences, so I'll just list reasons why...

    - LoN didn't even have America partaking
    - there was no united foreign and military policy with the LoN
    - Anglo-German Naval Agreement in 1935
    - lack of action from the Italian invasion of Abyssinia in 1935
    - talks of an Anglo-German alliance (yes the Nazis could have been on the same side as us)
    - no intervention in 1936 with reoccupation of the Rhineland
    - no intervention during Anschluss or when they took the Sudetenland
    - no intervention in the 1939 Czechoslovakia invasion
    - Non-Agression pact between Germany and USSR which literally carved up Poland just days before WW2 began
    - disunity among the nations, with Mussolini being too indecisive
    - USA declaring it would not go to war in Europe

    Think we have different ideas of caused.
    Imo Hitler was alawats going to do it eventually.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 999tigger)
    Think we have different ideas of caused.
    Imo Hitler was alawats going to do it eventually.
    He was always wanting to expand, but I don't think he cared about the way it was carried out. War, even for fanatics, is a last option because of the strain on resources. There is a bit of me that likes to think Hitler thought he would get pretty much the whole of Spain, Central and Eastern Europe through negotiations with fellow Fascist countries and appeasement with the rest.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 999tigger)
    Think we have different ideas of caused.
    Imo Hitler was alawats going to do it eventually.
    Despite all the background issues and feeble diplomacy, this is ultimately true.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Very Important Poster
    Online

    19
    (Original post by ageshallnot)
    Despite all the background issues and feeble diplomacy, this is ultimately true.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    I think its the difference between caused and prevented. I was just interested by the claims Chamberlain or Mussolini caused it rather than factors that didnt help. I miss History sometimes wih I'd taken it at Uni. World War II is an amazing period.
    • Community Assistant
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Guys, the question was about sources. Not GCSE reasoning.
    (Original post by rhyscedwards2)
    I've just started my Alevel history coursework and my question is "how far can Hitler be blamed for the starting of World war 2?" Anyone got any ideas where i can get good sources to argue both sides??
    I would start with propaganda for both sides of the argument. Or maybe start with a textbook, see what sources they've used and find out if there are similar ones. Find out if there is a German equivalent of Punch!
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Break up or unrequited love?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.