Join TSR now and get all your revision questions answeredSign up now

Proof by induction

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Show that
    1^3 +3^3 +5^3 + ... +(2n-1)^3
    can be written as
    \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{2n} r^3 -\sum_{r=1}^n (2r)^3

    I have managed to prove the first summation but not the second here's what i've managed to do so far.



    \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{2n-1} r^3 =\sum_{r=1}^{2n} r^3 -(2n)^3


    help please.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    First, LaTeX issues: you need \sum_{r=1}^{2n} (and later \sum_{r-1}^{2n-1} or similar) to get the summations right.

    As far as the actual maths goes, you seem very confused about what you're doing. I have no idea what you mean by "I have managed to prove the first summation"; you are not going to be able to "prove" one summation by itself - the point of the question is to replace the original sum by two "simpler" (in the sense that they are in the formula booklet) summations.

    At this point I would suggest you set n = 3 (or 4), and explicitly write out the terms of the original sum and the terms of the two sums underneath. Hopefully this will show you what is actually going on here.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DFranklin)
    First, LaTeX issues: you need \sum_{r=1}^{2n} (and later \sum_{r-1}^{2n-1} or similar) to get the summations right.

    As far as the actual maths goes, you seem very confused about what you're doing. I have no idea what you mean by "I have managed to prove the first summation"; you are not going to be able to "prove" one summation by itself - the point of the question is to replace the original sum by two "simpler" (in the sense that they are in the formula booklet) summations.

    At this point I would suggest you set n = 3 (or 4), and explicitly write out the terms of the original sum and the terms of the two sums underneath. Hopefully this will show you what is actually going on here.
    ok they're sorted.

    I see so actually when n=3 we get 1³+2³+3³+4³+5³+6³-2³-4³-6³
    But am i allowed to use the summations to work backwards and prove ti that way or does that not work?
    Online

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Is it required that you have to use induction, or can you use evaluate each summation in terms of n and show that they are in fact the same.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by B_9710)
    Is it required that you have to use induction, or can you use evaluate each summation in terms of n and show that they are in fact the same.
    Here is the original question.
 
 
 
Poll
Do you have exam superstitions?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.