Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Proof by induction Watch

Announcements
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Show that
    1^3 +3^3 +5^3 + ... +(2n-1)^3
    can be written as
    \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{2n} r^3 -\sum_{r=1}^n (2r)^3

    I have managed to prove the first summation but not the second here's what i've managed to do so far.



    \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{2n-1} r^3 =\sum_{r=1}^{2n} r^3 -(2n)^3


    help please.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    First, LaTeX issues: you need \sum_{r=1}^{2n} (and later \sum_{r-1}^{2n-1} or similar) to get the summations right.

    As far as the actual maths goes, you seem very confused about what you're doing. I have no idea what you mean by "I have managed to prove the first summation"; you are not going to be able to "prove" one summation by itself - the point of the question is to replace the original sum by two "simpler" (in the sense that they are in the formula booklet) summations.

    At this point I would suggest you set n = 3 (or 4), and explicitly write out the terms of the original sum and the terms of the two sums underneath. Hopefully this will show you what is actually going on here.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DFranklin)
    First, LaTeX issues: you need \sum_{r=1}^{2n} (and later \sum_{r-1}^{2n-1} or similar) to get the summations right.

    As far as the actual maths goes, you seem very confused about what you're doing. I have no idea what you mean by "I have managed to prove the first summation"; you are not going to be able to "prove" one summation by itself - the point of the question is to replace the original sum by two "simpler" (in the sense that they are in the formula booklet) summations.

    At this point I would suggest you set n = 3 (or 4), and explicitly write out the terms of the original sum and the terms of the two sums underneath. Hopefully this will show you what is actually going on here.
    ok they're sorted.

    I see so actually when n=3 we get 1³+2³+3³+4³+5³+6³-2³-4³-6³
    But am i allowed to use the summations to work backwards and prove ti that way or does that not work?
    Online

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Is it required that you have to use induction, or can you use evaluate each summation in terms of n and show that they are in fact the same.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by B_9710)
    Is it required that you have to use induction, or can you use evaluate each summation in terms of n and show that they are in fact the same.
    Here is the original question.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    How are your GCSEs going so far?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.