Do you agree with abortion??

Scroll to see replies

Reply 440

SirMilkSheikh

Original post by cherryred90s

It's also a scientific fact that sperm alone has unique DNA as does an unfertilised egg, does that make them human?

Sperm and unfertilised eggs are not human beings.

Reply 441

laurenliem234

Original post by Josb

An embryo is not a human being, precisely.

Oh, I'm sorry. It only TURNS INTO a human.

That's like saying a toddler isn't a human, it's a toddler. Embryos are just a stage of development.

Reply 442

jordandc98

Yes...people are stupid (including myself <3), we sometimes don't know what we want in life, and having a child is a HUGE responsibility, you have to ask yourself are you in the position to be able to drop everything and how is their quality of life going to be. Then you have the other-side where inhumane acts occur, such as rape...so that is a no brainer really. So yes abortion should be allowed but should not be abused, I have heard some people that have had multiple abortions which makes me sick as they act like it isn't anything. There needs to be regulations, I am not aware if there is any in UK.

Reply 443

Josb

So it's not a human. Otherwise eggs and sperms would be humans too.

Toddlers are human beings, precisely.

Reply 444

laurenliem234

Original post by Josb

So it's not a human. Otherwise eggs and sperms would be humans too.

Toddlers are human beings, precisely.

i'm not gonna argue with you, dude. i'm just saying embryos have a right to live, like any other human being. would you be cool if your mother decided she didnt want you and killed you without your consent?

i wouldnt, in my opinion.

i like my life

Reply 445

skunkboy

If abortions do support sluts or adulterers to become popular , the answer is NO!

http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/615820/infidelity-rates-UK-revealed-shocking

I definitely don't support sluts or adulterers. :-)

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 446

ZacLaw

So by the same logic sperm is a person, as it "turns into a human". I guess that makes masterbation mass genocide.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 447

Josb

Original post by ZacLaw

So by the same logic sperm is a person, as it "turns into a human". I guess that makes masterbation mass genocide.

Posted from TSR Mobile

I have killed several billions of people. :cry:

Reply 448

Josb

My mother couldn't kill me since I didn't existed. Embryos are not human.

Reply 449

prazzyjazzy

Pro-Abortion/Pro-Choice, whichever you'd like to call it.

Reply 450

Joep95

Original post by Josb

My mother couldn't kill me since I didn't existed. Embryos are not human.

Convincing yourself someone isn't human tends to make killing easier, when do you think people should have rights?

Reply 451

ZacLaw

Original post by joecphillips

Convincing yourself someone isn't human tends to make killing easier, when do you think people should have rights?

What's the difference between a person and a ball of cells? A person has consciousness and the ability to feel. That's what makes a person have rights.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 452

cherryred90s

Original post by SirMilkSheikh

Sperm and unfertilised eggs are not human beings.

So you still haven't explained what makes someone a human. It's difficult isn't it?

Reply 453

Joep95

Original post by ZacLaw

What's the difference between a person and a ball of cells? A person has consciousness and the ability to feel. That's what makes a person have rights.

Posted from TSR Mobile

So is it consciousness and the ability to feel what gives rights?

Humans are also a ball of cells the difference is one has grown from the first stage.

(edited 7 years ago)

Reply 454

ZacLaw

Original post by joecphillips

So is it consciousness and the ability to feel what gives rights?

Humans are also a ball of cells the difference is one has grown from the first stage.

A ball of cells is just that, a ball of cells. As I said previously, sperm is the first stage of a foetuses development, doesn't that make masterbation mass murder?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 455

Joep95

Original post by ZacLaw

A ball of cells is just that, a ball of cells. As I said previously, sperm is the first stage of a foetuses development, doesn't that make masterbation mass murder?

Posted from TSR Mobile

And birth is another stage of development so why not allow people to kill new born babies.

No it does not, if you leave sperm alone it has a 0% chance of creating human life, If you leave a fertilised egg alone then there there is a high chance of creating human life.

Also I would like to point out I'm not for banning abortion that would just cause problems I would just like people to use the correct language, if you end the life of an animal then you have killed it, why change the language for unborn babies?

Reply 456

SirMilkSheikh

Original post by cherryred90s

So you still haven't explained what makes someone a human. It's difficult isn't it?

I have, you have ignored it or completely forgotten or maybe you can't comprehend it. Fertilisation of an egg creates a new human being. It is not difficult (only for you it is)

Reply 457

ZacLaw

Original post by joecphillips

So you're saying that the second sperm enters the egg it's classed as life and cannot be aborted?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 458

Joep95

Original post by ZacLaw

So you're saying that the second sperm enters the egg it's classed as life and cannot be aborted?

Posted from TSR Mobile

I'm not saying ban abortion, I just want the act to be called what it is which is killing a unborn baby.

Reply 459

SirMilkSheikh

Original post by Josb

So it's not a human. Otherwise eggs and sperms would be humans too.

Toddlers are human beings, precisely.

Sperm/eggs aren't human beings, they contain human life like lungs and kidneys. You don't even need to think too hard about this, but all the pro-abortionists are trying to jump through mental hoops to justify killing an unborn baby.

"As pointed out above in the background section, there is a radical difference, scientifically, between parts of a human being that only possess "human life" and a human embryo or human fetus that is an actual "human being." Abortion is the destruction of a human being. Destroying a human sperm or a human oocyte would not constitute abortion, since neither are human beings. The issue is not when does human life begin, but rather when does the life of every human being begin. A human kidney or liver, a human skin cell, a sperm or an oocyte all possess human life, but they are not human beings, they are only parts of a human being. If a single sperm or a single oocyte were implanted into a woman's uterus, they would not grow; they would simply disintegrate."

https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/wdhbb.html