Original post by Muttley79

Post your working so far.

Well I dont know how to approach this question, Neither the expected value nor observed value ...

Question says: "The Chi squared test can be used to determine whether the results of this

investigation indicate a significant difference in the distribution of young larvae between the light and the dark side"

Now your focus is only on the young - and the values in the table are your observed values.

Do you think you can now carry on with the question?

investigation indicate a significant difference in the distribution of young larvae between the light and the dark side"

Now your focus is only on the young - and the values in the table are your observed values.

Do you think you can now carry on with the question?

Original post by Yusufff

Question says: "The Chi squared test can be used to determine whether the results of this

investigation indicate a significant difference in the distribution of young larvae between the light and the dark side"

Now your focus is only on the young - and the values in the table are your observed values.

Do you think you can now carry on with the question?

investigation indicate a significant difference in the distribution of young larvae between the light and the dark side"

Now your focus is only on the young - and the values in the table are your observed values.

Do you think you can now carry on with the question?

I am so confused

Original post by alesha98

I am so confused

We can't post full solutions ...

If there was no difference what would the results be - these are the expected values.

Original post by cb3563

Did you manage to work out the answer to this? I have been trying for the last hour and I don't think the answer is right! I cannot work it out.

this should help a fair bit, Im still learning it myself

http://www.shmoop.com/genetics/chi-squared-test.html

Right! I know this thread is old but It has been bugging me and I have finally cracked the code!

After looking at the mark scheme and thinking what the actual f.u.q I took it back to basics.

I just followed the steps to chi squared really slowly. So:

As no expected values are given, you must assume an equal division of the larvae --> 5 larvae on each side in each trial. So the total for the expected on the dark side, for both trials is 5 + 5 = 10 and for light side 5 +5 = 10.

So our expected for both dark and light is 10 and 10. Now, we get out observed. tbh, the table of results is confusing and is just a prime example of edexcel's shoddy work but, the way I looked at it is:

In trial 2 flip the results over, as in this trial it was the left side that was light and the right side that was dark, not the way the table has portrayed it. edexcel are sneaky biatches.

so add up the observed values ( light= 1+2, dark 9+8) So our observed for light side is 3 and our observed for dark is 17.

Now, subtract the expected from the observed: 17 - 10 = 7 // 3 - 10 = -7, then square it : 7^2 = 49 // -7^2 = -49

Then divide these answers by the expected for each trial (10) which should give us -4.9 and 4.9.

Where I kept tripping up is me forgetting that negative values become positive at this stage. so all you have to do now, is get rid of that negative sign and add 4.9 and 4.9 together to get 9.8.

Which is the answer on the mark scheme.

EDIT: I noticed that when you manually enter into the calculator -7 x -7 you get a whole number of 49, but when you do -7 and press the square button it comes in a negative form. so to be safe always enter the calculations manually.

After looking at the mark scheme and thinking what the actual f.u.q I took it back to basics.

I just followed the steps to chi squared really slowly. So:

As no expected values are given, you must assume an equal division of the larvae --> 5 larvae on each side in each trial. So the total for the expected on the dark side, for both trials is 5 + 5 = 10 and for light side 5 +5 = 10.

So our expected for both dark and light is 10 and 10. Now, we get out observed. tbh, the table of results is confusing and is just a prime example of edexcel's shoddy work but, the way I looked at it is:

In trial 2 flip the results over, as in this trial it was the left side that was light and the right side that was dark, not the way the table has portrayed it. edexcel are sneaky biatches.

so add up the observed values ( light= 1+2, dark 9+8) So our observed for light side is 3 and our observed for dark is 17.

Now, subtract the expected from the observed: 17 - 10 = 7 // 3 - 10 = -7, then square it : 7^2 = 49 // -7^2 = -49

Then divide these answers by the expected for each trial (10) which should give us -4.9 and 4.9.

Where I kept tripping up is me forgetting that negative values become positive at this stage. so all you have to do now, is get rid of that negative sign and add 4.9 and 4.9 together to get 9.8.

Which is the answer on the mark scheme.

EDIT: I noticed that when you manually enter into the calculator -7 x -7 you get a whole number of 49, but when you do -7 and press the square button it comes in a negative form. so to be safe always enter the calculations manually.

Omg thankyou so much this is so helpful!

Original post by Dominique710

Omg thankyou so much this is so helpful!

No problemo! I’m glad I could help somebody!

Original post by Cereidee

Right! I know this thread is old but It has been bugging me and I have finally cracked the code!

After looking at the mark scheme and thinking what the actual f.u.q I took it back to basics.

I just followed the steps to chi squared really slowly. So:

As no expected values are given, you must assume an equal division of the larvae --> 5 larvae on each side in each trial. So the total for the expected on the dark side, for both trials is 5 + 5 = 10 and for light side 5 +5 = 10.

So our expected for both dark and light is 10 and 10. Now, we get out observed. tbh, the table of results is confusing and is just a prime example of edexcel's shoddy work but, the way I looked at it is:

In trial 2 flip the results over, as in this trial it was the left side that was light and the right side that was dark, not the way the table has portrayed it. edexcel are sneaky biatches.

so add up the observed values ( light= 1+2, dark 9+8) So our observed for light side is 3 and our observed for dark is 17.

Now, subtract the expected from the observed: 17 - 10 = 7 // 3 - 10 = -7, then square it : 7^2 = 49 // -7^2 = -49

Then divide these answers by the expected for each trial (10) which should give us -4.9 and 4.9.

Where I kept tripping up is me forgetting that negative values become positive at this stage. so all you have to do now, is get rid of that negative sign and add 4.9 and 4.9 together to get 9.8.

Which is the answer on the mark scheme.

EDIT: I noticed that when you manually enter into the calculator -7 x -7 you get a whole number of 49, but when you do -7 and press the square button it comes in a negative form. so to be safe always enter the calculations manually.

After looking at the mark scheme and thinking what the actual f.u.q I took it back to basics.

I just followed the steps to chi squared really slowly. So:

As no expected values are given, you must assume an equal division of the larvae --> 5 larvae on each side in each trial. So the total for the expected on the dark side, for both trials is 5 + 5 = 10 and for light side 5 +5 = 10.

So our expected for both dark and light is 10 and 10. Now, we get out observed. tbh, the table of results is confusing and is just a prime example of edexcel's shoddy work but, the way I looked at it is:

In trial 2 flip the results over, as in this trial it was the left side that was light and the right side that was dark, not the way the table has portrayed it. edexcel are sneaky biatches.

so add up the observed values ( light= 1+2, dark 9+8) So our observed for light side is 3 and our observed for dark is 17.

Now, subtract the expected from the observed: 17 - 10 = 7 // 3 - 10 = -7, then square it : 7^2 = 49 // -7^2 = -49

Then divide these answers by the expected for each trial (10) which should give us -4.9 and 4.9.

Where I kept tripping up is me forgetting that negative values become positive at this stage. so all you have to do now, is get rid of that negative sign and add 4.9 and 4.9 together to get 9.8.

Which is the answer on the mark scheme.

EDIT: I noticed that when you manually enter into the calculator -7 x -7 you get a whole number of 49, but when you do -7 and press the square button it comes in a negative form. so to be safe always enter the calculations manually.

thing is i would say since the distribution of young larvae should be equal on both sides so considering the total number of larvae on the first trial is 20 and the total number of young larvae are 10 and the total number of larvae (young and old) on the left side is 11 so the number of larvae in trial 1 on the left side would be

10/20 x 11 around 5.5 then repeat this with the other 4 values and add them up i get around as my value 9.8

Original post by basilqazi1

thing is i would say since the distribution of young larvae should be equal on both sides so considering the total number of larvae on the first trial is 20 and the total number of young larvae are 10 and the total number of larvae (young and old) on the left side is 11 so the number of larvae in trial 1 on the left side would be

10/20 x 11 around 5.5 then repeat this with the other 4 values and add them up i get around as my value 9.8

10/20 x 11 around 5.5 then repeat this with the other 4 values and add them up i get around as my value 9.8

This method would not receive you 0/3 marks as you have not used the Chi-squared formula. Do not do it this way.

Also your calculations confuse me. If I have understood correctly, doing the equation you have shared for each side for each trial then adding them together, gets you 20, not 9.8.

Your best bet is to learn the formulas and stick to them.

Original post by Cereidee

Right! I know this thread is old but It has been bugging me and I have finally cracked the code!

After looking at the mark scheme and thinking what the actual f.u.q I took it back to basics.

I just followed the steps to chi squared really slowly. So:

As no expected values are given, you must assume an equal division of the larvae --> 5 larvae on each side in each trial. So the total for the expected on the dark side, for both trials is 5 + 5 = 10 and for light side 5 +5 = 10.

So our expected for both dark and light is 10 and 10. Now, we get out observed. tbh, the table of results is confusing and is just a prime example of edexcel's shoddy work but, the way I looked at it is:

In trial 2 flip the results over, as in this trial it was the left side that was light and the right side that was dark, not the way the table has portrayed it. edexcel are sneaky biatches.

so add up the observed values ( light= 1+2, dark 9+8) So our observed for light side is 3 and our observed for dark is 17.

Now, subtract the expected from the observed: 17 - 10 = 7 // 3 - 10 = -7, then square it : 7^2 = 49 // -7^2 = -49

Then divide these answers by the expected for each trial (10) which should give us -4.9 and 4.9.

Where I kept tripping up is me forgetting that negative values become positive at this stage. so all you have to do now, is get rid of that negative sign and add 4.9 and 4.9 together to get 9.8.

Which is the answer on the mark scheme.

EDIT: I noticed that when you manually enter into the calculator -7 x -7 you get a whole number of 49, but when you do -7 and press the square button it comes in a negative form. so to be safe always enter the calculations manually.

After looking at the mark scheme and thinking what the actual f.u.q I took it back to basics.

I just followed the steps to chi squared really slowly. So:

As no expected values are given, you must assume an equal division of the larvae --> 5 larvae on each side in each trial. So the total for the expected on the dark side, for both trials is 5 + 5 = 10 and for light side 5 +5 = 10.

So our expected for both dark and light is 10 and 10. Now, we get out observed. tbh, the table of results is confusing and is just a prime example of edexcel's shoddy work but, the way I looked at it is:

In trial 2 flip the results over, as in this trial it was the left side that was light and the right side that was dark, not the way the table has portrayed it. edexcel are sneaky biatches.

so add up the observed values ( light= 1+2, dark 9+8) So our observed for light side is 3 and our observed for dark is 17.

Now, subtract the expected from the observed: 17 - 10 = 7 // 3 - 10 = -7, then square it : 7^2 = 49 // -7^2 = -49

Then divide these answers by the expected for each trial (10) which should give us -4.9 and 4.9.

Where I kept tripping up is me forgetting that negative values become positive at this stage. so all you have to do now, is get rid of that negative sign and add 4.9 and 4.9 together to get 9.8.

Which is the answer on the mark scheme.

EDIT: I noticed that when you manually enter into the calculator -7 x -7 you get a whole number of 49, but when you do -7 and press the square button it comes in a negative form. so to be safe always enter the calculations manually.

6 years into the future. you saved me a headache

- Daphnia heart rate Practical
- Cross-tabulations and Chi-squared
- Wjec further maths unit 1 thoughts
- Discrete Random Variables
- AS Level OCR A Biology 2024
- Statistical analysis using prism help please!
- AQA A LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY Statistical tests
- Applied science unit 3
- Edexcel A-level Statistics Paper 2 (9ST0 02) - 12th June 2024 [Exam Chat]
- Alevel geography
- What do you need to and not need to memorise for Research Methods in psych?
- OCR Biology A level predictions for paper 3?
- Edexcel A-level Psychology Paper 1 (9PS0 01) - 19th May 2023 [Exam Chat]
- Do you go to the same cinema or go to different ones to watch movies?
- Geography NEA - questionnaire data presentation
- Lse Economics and Economic history…help please
- Rays and Geometry
- AS Level Further Statistics May 17 2024
- Am I screwed? [Further Maths AS]
- OCR MEI A Level Further Mathematics Mechanics Minor Y431/01 - 07 Jun 2024 [Exam Chat]

Latest

Trending

Last reply 4 hours ago

AQA A-Level Biology Paper 3 (7402/3) - 19th June 2024 [Exam Chat]Posted 1 month ago

Brunner's Glands vs Crypts of LieberkuhnLast reply 1 month ago

13th may 2024 AS level Biology aqa examLast reply 2 months ago

iGCSE Edexcel Biology Paper 2B 2024Posted 2 months ago

Topics in IGCSE edexcel biology 1BRLast reply 2 months ago

A-level Biology Study Group 2023-2024Last reply 2 months ago

Is anyone cooked for ocr a level biology?Last reply 2 months ago

GCSE Biology Study Group 2023-2024