ThatOldGuy
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#1
And thanks to the University of Oregon, we have just that.

http://phg.sagepub.com/content/early...23368.abstract

I think it is so important that we point out the sexism inherent in glaciers and glacial representations. We never see glaciers with feminine products, or seek to understand human-ice interactions in a dynamic that....

I'm sorry. I just can't. This is a published paper. A. PUBLISHED. PAPER. On the sexism of human-ice interactions that seeks to understand glaciers in, and I quote:

alternative representations of glaciers. Merging feminist postcolonial science studies and feminist political ecology, the feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power, and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions.
I have no idea what a feminist glaciology framework is. The university of Oregon is bad and they should feel bad.
1
reply
Asolare
Badges: 20
#2
Report 4 years ago
#2
Feminism should kindly stay away from subjects such as the natural sciences, philosophy etc. as the effect is only disastrous.

Richard Dawkins discusses a little bit of hilarious feminist-science from 03:07 in this video

https://youtu.be/eKPWW5uu200?t=3m7s
1
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Do you have the space and resources you need to succeed in home learning?

Yes I have everything I need (394)
56.61%
I don't have everything I need (302)
43.39%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed