It was funny when Trump won, but now.,

I'll give Trump a chance before I make any judgements, although I personally don't have a huge amount of faith. Mainly on his "Global Warming is a myth" and "Vaccines are dangerous" views (Anti-science views instantly set off alarm bells in my head). His anti-establishment stance I can get behind, but not his stance against the Scientific Consensus. Also, he installed a creationist as the Education Secretary. Let that sink in. A Creationist. Someone who denies evolution and believes that the world was created by magical sky-daddy. But that's an argument for a different day.

Surely anyone running for the most powerful office in the world needs to be an egomaniacal narcissist. You're delusional for thinking otherwise.

Power hungry yes, but no more. You must lead a pretty ****ing sad life with views like that, and behaviors like that towards others.

Cool. Hopefully Trump won't backtrack on giving power to boards and not the government.

And which views are you talking about?

As mentioned in my first post, still waiting for a credible, reason-based criticism of Trump.

I forgot he brought that nutcase back. She's downright insane. Also, I think Pence is insurance for Trump against assassination - Pence is so bad no one will want to shoot Trump for fear of letting Pence into the Presidency.

They come in as legal migrants, and stay as illegal migrants. If you build a wall, people can still come over legally, and then outstay their visas and never go home. So you could still see numbers of illegal immigrants rise, even if nobody crosses the border illegally.

.... no.

People know about the electoral college and they are saying that it is ********. Hillary should have won because that is what the majority of people decided.

The truth of the matter is that the Republi***** would be obsolete if it wasn't for the Electoral College. They would have lost all the elections since Bill Clinton, the popular vote always goes to Democrats.

The next time Democrats are in charge, they will seriously need to work to abolish this outdated, undemocratic system.

what quote?
why do you think I'm asking you? because you're not being at all specific, so I can't even give you a response to an imaginary quote



trump isn't my ideal - I am a libertarian and he is a...well...I have no idea. he's an anomaly. I prefer a politician with (good) conviction, but at least he has more conviction in his little finger than hilary does. he seems to have convictions of international realism and american nationalism. but that's not a unified ideology with respect to social issues locally (he seems to be somewhat liberal, despite his republican-esque presentation - he's pretty supportive of LGBT issues and he isn't a theocrat like the other republicans - I'd hardly even term him a republican seeing as he had no support from that party whatsoever).



2% margin - wow - quite a margin! and while brexit was won by 4%, people like you comdemned that as not enough?



the democrats were happy with a career politician - the other parties weren't...she was more unlucky for just being a terrible politician though.



yeah, that's a real quote, isn't it



the fact checkers at the huffington post



cba - I cba as it is - my PC is running like windows 98 right now and this is taking too much time to respond to.



okay, I'll wait for the evidence



yeah, that is kind of awkward that he had to come out with that at the white house - pretty much just wipes his whole history of the birther movement and his republican platform clean. not so much hypocrisy though when we know he's clearly *having* to lie. I mean, clinton said she would accept a defeat yet obviously she was saying that trump isn't fit to hold office - doesn't exactly sound like she'd "accept" defeat, saying that...very superficial



see, you're not actually talking about policy positions really. you're talking about his views on countries, or similar.



if you said that poor people are exploitable then what else are they? that runs count to the narrative of free market capitalism where each contract is mutually beneficial to all parties. ergo, there's no such thing as exploitation, even if the margins of profits are massively dissimilar.

Based on a quick google search it seems that the syllabus is set by a locally elected school board, the interesting thing is what will happen with the department of education as trump wanted to give even more power to school boards and away from the government.

.... no.

People know about the electoral college and they are saying that it is ********. Hillary should have won because that is what the majority of people decided.

The truth of the matter is that the Republi***** would be obsolete if it wasn't for the Electoral College. They would have lost all the elections since Bill Clinton, the popular vote always goes to Democrats.

The next time Democrats are in charge, they will seriously need to work to abolish this outdated, undemocratic system.

There's more than one way for the illegals to get in. Granted, it doesn't protect against the way you mentioned.

Yeah. it's weird that this didn't get spoken about more during the campaign.

It's almost as if the 'wall' idea was a populist one aimed at getting votes by giving people something basic and not-too-complex that they can easily visualise, rather than being practically and logistically sound and effective.

I'm still waiting for an explanation as to why Trump isn't fit to run the country.

I have already given you one, just because you think it's not, means jack ****.

[video]https://youtu.be/6eoo2oL2zLE[/video]

A personality trait that isn't even necessarily a flaw does not mean he's unfit to run. Try again.

I'd take a corporate billionaire over a corporatist multi-millionaire anyday. at least the former made their wealth fairly.

Acting in his own best interest rather than the country's, makes him rather unfit.

In fact, it is exactly that which can get someone impeached.