# Interference and stationary waves

Watch
Announcements
#1
Okay so I'm confused. In my OCR AS textbook the diagrams for destructive interference and for a stationary wave are the same. Yet at the antinodes on the stationary wave there is constructive interference because the waves are 'in phase' and there is maximum displacement. Why on the destructive interference diagram are the same points destructive and the resultant displacement 0 not maximum? I don't know if any of this makes sense but I'm confused and hopefully someone understands.
0
4 years ago
#2
The terms stationary wave and interference are not alternative phrases for the same thing. They are two different aspects of waves.

The top diagram is showing two waves that occupy the same point being added together. This is about interference.

The bottom diagram is showing the same stationary wave at two different points in time. The wave will have a time period 'T' and the dotted line is the wave half T before or after the solid line. This is the wave you have if you tie a washing line at the ends and vibrate it at its resonant frequency.
2
4 years ago
#3
In second diagram, the waves are out of phase (theta=90) with same amplitude and frequency/wavelength. Such waves can only interfere destructively which leads to the output as zero displacement. Hope it help....
2
#4
(Original post by nerak99)
The terms stationary wave and interference are not alternative phrases for the same thing. They are two different aspects of waves.

The top diagram is showing two waves that occupy the same point being added together. This is about interference.

The bottom diagram is showing the same stationary wave at two different points in time. The wave will have a time period 'T' and the dotted line is the wave half T before or after the solid line. This is the wave you have if you tie a washing line at the ends and vibrate it at its resonant frequency.
Ah that makes sense, I thought the second diagram was showing two separate waves not one at different time periods!

Thank you very much
0
4 years ago
#5
Although the users before have given good explanations, I would add another one of myself:

In terms of inferference, it depends on the phases, so the interaction between wave peaks (= amplitudes with a maximum) and wave troughs (amplitudes with a minimum) . If a wave peak faces a wave trough, it is destructive. In the contrary case (wave peak faces a wave peak and thus a wave trough a wave trough), it is constructive.

A stationary wave is just an one which comes into being, if an emitted wave faces a reflected one. They are going in two different directions and when they interact with each other. A stationary wave, which is oscillating via the nodes, is the result of it. narak99 named a good example. When a washing line begins to oscillate, it comes to an emitted wave first, when the wave hits a clothes horse, reflection begins what leads to an interaction of reflected and emitted wave. This is an appearance of two different directions (and two waves with the same frequency of course).

Waves of destructive interference have the same direction instead. Just thinking about the wave trough which is creating waves by double slits. As they are in the same direction, destructive interference would never lead to a stationary wave.
2
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Should there be a new university admissions system that ditches predicted grades?

No, I think predicted grades should still be used to make offers (554)
33.95%
Yes, I like the idea of applying to uni after I received my grades (PQA) (674)
41.3%
Yes, I like the idea of receiving offers only after I receive my grades (PQO) (330)
20.22%
I think there is a better option than the ones suggested (let us know in the thread!) (74)
4.53%