Hello,
Now I probably havn't researched universities enough and I certainly havn't visited enough - its taken me long enough to get it figured out in my head that history is what I want to study! In any case, I don't want to make a rash decision so I thought i'd throw up a few queries that people might be able to help with to get me on my way.
My grades weren't so good last year and after applying to Bristol, Warwick, Oxford, Exeter, York and Manchester, I only got offers from the latter three. I was quite pleased in any case, seeing as Exeter was my third choice and both Bristol and Oxford were always a long shot. But grades have turned out better than expected with 3 high A's at A2 and I might not take the Exeter offer afterall.
On one level i'm tempted to go by league tables, and then on the other hand, I feel that its not a good way to judge which university I go to. I mean, overall, Bristol (originally my first choice and I love the city and university from what i've seen) is higher than both York and Exeter is general league tables, but in History league tables, York tends to beat out both. As silly as this may seem, what does this mean? Would I be better of with a degree from Bristol in just about anything seeing as its a better regarded university than the other two, or would the university that supposedly offers the best History course, York, be better for me in terms of career prospects (of course dependent on whether or not I follow a career path where my history degree is of relevance) and of course, enjoyment.
I know that all three are top universities and looking at it that way I feel that maybe I should just get on with it and be happy with Exeter! Yet it is 3+ years, so I feel I should do a bit more research which, as said, I havn't really done so far. Re-applying may mean losing Exeter alltogether as I won't necessarilly get another offer; in fact i'm a bit worried that they may keep track of old applicants and seeing my name pop up again in next years cycle, assume that Exeter isn't my first choice and that i'm not all that interested in the course. Very difficult to decide.
In any case, reading through the above mess, I guess what i'm really asking is how far the league tables matter. Will there be a significant difference in the quality of the History course I get at York compared to Bristol for example, or is it all negligble really? And, if anyone's done a History course at any of the above universities, than I wouldn't mind hearing about it. Basically i'm at a deadpoint and any encouragement one way or another, would be much appreciated!
Thanks,
Mike