Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Why do liberal leftists believe that diversity is better! Watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Liberal leftists hold as their mantra that diversity is good and it follows that a more diverse community is better than a non-diverse one.

    I would argue that it's the qualities of the group that are important and not it's level of diversity. You have one very diverse criminal gang and an all black church choir. The diverse criminal gang is not better than the black church choir just because it is diverse.

    In fact studies have found that diversity decreases trust and therefore morality. Less crime happens in non-diverse cultures.

    In conclusion diversity does not equal good.



    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Political Ambassador
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    k :rolleyes:
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Why do fascist alt-righters not know how to use punctuation correctly?
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Palmyra)
    Why do fascist alt-righters not know how to use punctuation correctly?
    Why do leftists not know the definition of fascism? And especially that fascism occurs in far-left states?

    Probably because they are reading / writing from a script and not thinking.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Well if diversity doesn't really impact anything, then why try to stop it?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Welshstig)
    Well if diversity doesn't really impact anything, then why try to stop it?
    I don't try to stop it. Liberal leftists try to stop diversity by mixing all the world's people in the same zones so that races breed out. I would support a more multi polar world where individual regions remain mostly with their own indigenous people and hence preserve diversity.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Thrift2017)
    I don't try to stop it. Liberal leftists try to stop diversity by mixing all the world's people in the same zones so that races breed out. I would support a more multi polar world where individual regions remain mostly with their own indigenous people and hence preserve diversity.
    First you say that "diversity does not equal good", and now you say you want to "preserve diversity" - so, which is it?
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Thrift2017)
    I don't try to stop it. Liberal leftists try to stop diversity by mixing all the world's people in the same zones so that races breed out. I would support a more multi polar world where individual regions remain mostly with their own indigenous people and hence preserve diversity.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Interesting, so the real question is, why do you believe diversity is better?
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Thrift2017)
    Less crime happens in non-diverse cultures.
    "Statistics" like this really ****ing aggravate me, because it's a stand-alone statement with no context whatsoever. My girlfriend pulls this **** a lot when we're discussing equality between the sexes; she's all "only 1 in 5 parliament members are women", so I'm like "That's such an empty statement. Why are women 1 in 5?". There's no background to it, it just automatically assume sexism.

    What if the reason for 1 in 5 MPs being women was because 1 in 5 people doing degrees in politics were women? (That's not the actual reason, but common sense dictates that it's equally as likely to be a case of supply and demand as it is sexism. I've actually tried to find the ratio between men and women doing politics degrees but have failed, but if anyone knows the statistics regarding that then be my guest and post them).

    (Edit: as of 2015-16 the number is closer to 1 in 3 instead of 1 in 5).

    What if women aren't all that concerned with being involved in politics? Again, equally as likely as sexism. Should female MPs make up half of parliament? Sure, why not? As long as their appointment to a position is based in merit then there's nothing wrong with that.

    My point, having gone off on a tangent about something else entirely, is that empty statement are useless without background information that provides a reasoning for social divides.

    So yes, why your statement regarding crime being less prevalent in non-diverse communities may be true, what's the background to it? Why is there less crime in non-diverse communities?

    As much as I hate playing divide and conquer, and seemingly using someones' political alignment as an insult (which I'm not doing, but given the amount of it that goes on on here it wouldn't surprise me if someone perceived the following statement as such), it doesn't surprise me in the slightest that there's definitely a correlation between how far right of the spectrum you lean seems to correlate with how much you think the colour of someones' skin affects how prone they are to committing criminal acts.

    And if there's that kind of discrimination within society, would it not be acceptable to assume that people are committing those crimes because they need the money gained from those activities in order to feed their families as they're unable to get jobs due to racism? Or, if they've come in from another country, a lack of a level of education that certain jobs require? Or any other equally as likely explanation?

    I'm not condoning the crimes because there are ways and means of getting around those barriers, I'm merely saying that your condemnation of a diverse community based purely on the fact that there is less crime in non-diverse communities is rather short-sighted.

    I'm not a fan of multiculturalism when it leads to divided communities through non-integration, but it's not fair to look down on those who have tried to integrate based on those who haven't.

    Your overall sentiment seems to be "diversity for the sake of diversity is wack, yo", and I agree with that to a point. But that doesn't mean that diversity as a whole is a redundant concept.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Palmyra)
    First you say that "diversity does not equal good", and now you say you want to "preserve diversity" - so, which is it?
    I want to perverse natural diversity simple because it's the natural state as I don't want mad made intervention.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by XOR_)
    Interesting, so the real question is, why do you believe diversity is better?
    I oppose Marxism, man made paths to a said utopia. That is the basis for his man made liberal diversity/ natural non-diversity.

    You need to acknowledge the opposites here. I says liberal diversity is worse and natural diversity is better.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Thrift2017)
    Why do leftists not know the definition of fascism? And especially that fascism occurs in far-left states?

    Probably because they are reading / writing from a script and not thinking.

    If anything it is right wingers that are reading from a script all they do is repeat the same things over and over again with information they found with 2 minutes of "research" on a right leaning source and act like they are a paragon of knowledge.

    Fascism to be fair is one of the most vague hard to define ideologies there is. There are still debates on what counts as a Fascist movement. Fascism from what I can gather is an ideology that supports a far-right nationalist dictatorship. I have no idea why you think it is far left.

    Socialism is the ideology that people always seem to misuse. It's definition is straight foreword and is still misused constantly. It's definition is that the means of production are socially owned by the workers, not necessarily publicly owned. Cooperatives and the like are actually a form of Socialism.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    He's right, you know. I don't why we can't all just stay put in our countries of origin and stick to our own kind.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    I keep hearing about Western civilization. What you mean the Romans? The guys who had an empire in Libya, Egypt, Turkey, Greece and virtually everywhere? Sorry but where has this delusional nationalism even come from. Only the smallest societies have had virtually no interaction with outsiders. Even Japan during isolation was open to the Dutch.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Scottish Person)
    If anything it is right wingers that are reading from a script all they do is repeat the same things over and over again with information they found with 2 minutes of "research" on a right leaning source and act like they are a paragon of knowledge.

    Fascism to be fair is one of the most vague hard to define ideologies there is. There are still debates on what counts as a Fascist movement. Fascism from what I can gather is an ideology that supports a far-right nationalist dictatorship. I have no idea why you think it is far left.

    Socialism is the ideology that people always seem to misuse. It's definition is straight foreword and is still misused constantly. It's definition is that the means of production are socially owned by the workers, not necessarily publicly owned. Cooperatives and the like are actually a form of Socialism.
    No mate I'm not one of those people you talk about. I have been researching the topic for 10 years and have read numerous Frankfurt School authors and tracked the belief system right from 1919 through the Nazi era, second gen like Haberamas, the principles e.g. The claims of remediation alienation on the western world, transition from education system to government e.g. Marxist explosion in the 70s, political correctness in the 80s, transition to business in the 90s, New Labour mass immigration to establish a new baseline, to the current period of mass resistance to it. Liberals always lose the argument it me, most agree with me after about 5 mins.

    This is a synthesised constructed, cartel globalist enabling belief system.




    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Thrift2017)
    Liberal leftists hold as their mantra that diversity is good and it follows that a more diverse community is better than a non-diverse one.

    I would argue that it's the qualities of the group that are important and not it's level of diversity. You have one very diverse criminal gang and an all black church choir. The diverse criminal gang is not better than the black church choir just because it is diverse.

    In fact studies have found that diversity decreases trust and therefore morality. Less crime happens in non-diverse cultures.

    In conclusion diversity does not equal good.



    Posted from TSR Mobile
    I'm to really sure what you are saying. Are you suggesting British criminals and British people who do not contribute to society be placed on a ship and sent to Australia?
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Len Goodman)
    He's right, you know. I don't why we can't all just stay put in our countries of origin and stick to our own kind.
    Why can't you just stay in your mums basement?
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Don't particularly care what you look like or where you come from but the content of your character.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    ChaoticButterfly


    'To Paul Nuttalls of ukip I say this, abandon your dreams of Westminster and stay in liverpoool and concentrate on making Liverpool economically viable' 😂
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What newspaper do you read/prefer?
    Useful resources

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.