Israel doesn't want the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories to become Israeli citizens, because doing so would mean Israel ceasing to be a specifically "Jewish state" (as the ratio of Jews to Palestinians would be virtually 50:50).Palestinians should assimilate and become Israeli citizens with their own distinct national identities.
Turn on thread page Beta
Jerusalem 'lorry attack' injures 15 watch
- 09-01-2017 14:21
- 09-01-2017 14:23
- 09-01-2017 14:23
(Original post by anarchism101)
- 09-01-2017 14:25
Doesn't exist any more. It was pretty firmly proscribed at Nuremberg, for obvious reasons.
Israel doesn't want the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories to become Israeli citizens, because doing so would mean Israel ceasing to be a specifically "Jewish state" (as the ratio of Jews to Palestinians would be virtually 50:50).
Israel already has lots of Palestinian citizens.
- 09-01-2017 14:34
(Original post by ydp360)
- 09-01-2017 15:56
I give evidences and of course as I expected you were going to remain completely ignorant. Shakespeare's time is not early history, that is 2000 years after the term Palestine started to be used.
You're obviously out of your depth here kid.
(Original post by anarchism101)
A few points here:
i) There's no nation of anyone "out there in the ether". Nations are intersubjective constructs that only exist insofar as people believe they exist.
ii) Your choice of examples is particularly bizarre, as there are patently no British or Peruvian "nations" in the ethno-cultural sense. Britain is a multinational state of English, Scots, Welsh and Irish (and some would add Cornish). Only a small minority of UK citizens actually identify nationally as "British" - the majority primarily identify with one of the constituent countries. As for Peru, it has a cultural makeup similar to pretty much all of the former Spanish American colonies - the descendants of Spanish Criollo settlers live alongside the indigenous Native Americans. Do you really think White Spanish-speaking Peruvians are more culturally similar to Amerindian Quechua-speaking Peruvians than they are to white Spanish-speaking Bolivians/Mexicans/Chileans/etc? And indeed, many states are not defined by a particular ethno-cultural group; e.g. the USA, Switzerland, Belgium, Canada, etc.
iii) Why does it matter? The Palestinians are still being deprived of their civil and political rights regardless. Their ethno-national identification doesn't change that, nor does it change the territorial legalities of the situation. Would you prefer that the occupied territories simply became a full part of Israel and its inhabitants given full citizenship and political rights?
2. I just plucked countries out of the air, I actually know little to nothing about the internal politics of Peru. They have a cool desert, and I like the condors, but that's as far as my expertise goes. Nonetheless, in Britain there is a 300-year precedent for being British and its something that's generally accepted as being a part of one's national identity (ScotNats aside). The same is true for the majority of countries, even other Middle Eastern ones. As far as I know, Jordan never existed as a separate entity within roughly the same borders it has now. But I don't care that it exists, because nobody is trying to claim that there was always a bunch of people who feel passionately connected to this idea of a country called Jordan. Jews felt that way about Israel for thousands of years (and there's precedence for them living in Israel with roughly similar borders to now). Palestinian nationalism is fine, but don't try and tell me its a long-embattled movement of principle. It isn't.
3. The Palestinian Unity Government is a terrorist government. If I were Israel, I would treat Palestine exactly the way Palestine are being treated now. Why would you let Hamas off your leash when the only thing in the world that they want is to wipe you out?
- 09-01-2017 22:13
[QUOTE=jape;69461266]The word has been used, but there's never been a state in the territory that we refer to as Palestine or Israel that was Arab Muslim. Which is surely the important bit? If the word is all the matters why don't we just ship the Palestinians to Jordan? That was Palestine until the 20th Century.
Seriously your ignorance is just unbelievable. And what did the term Palestine mean? It meant the land, the area from the river to the Sea. You can moan all you want it existed and will never cease to exist.
Israel's days are numbered they are merely just a 100-200 year existence in that area, they will cease to exist, the way they conduct themselves and go about things is going to lead to their downfall.
(Original post by jape)
- 09-01-2017 23:26
1. What I meant by that was that there's no historical community of people self-identifying as Palestinian. That's extremely new, with no historical precedent whatsoever.
While there are some historians like Baruch Kimmerling who've argued that the origins of Palestinian nationalism date to the 19th Century, as far back as the 1834 Revolt, most place the beginning of Palestinian nationalism in earnest in the early Mandatory period, around 1920.
2. I just plucked countries out of the air, I actually know little to nothing about the internal politics of Peru. They have a cool desert, and I like the condors, but that's as far as my expertise goes.
Nonetheless, in Britain there is a 300-year precedent for being British and its something that's generally accepted as being a part of one's national identity (ScotNats aside).
- In England, 60% described themselves as English only, 9% as both English and British, and 19% as British only.
- In Wales, 58% described themselves as Welsh only, 7% as both Welsh and British, and 17% as British only.
- In Scotland, 62% described themselves as Scottish only, 18% as both Scottish and British, and 8% as British only.
- In Northern Ireland, 40% described themselves as British only, 20% as Northern Irish only, 25% as Irish only, and 6% as both Northern Irish and British.
This isn't just about those who support Scottish and Welsh independence - even many if not most who support staying in the UK identify far more with their constituent country than with Britain as a whole.
The same is true for the majority of countries, even other Middle Eastern ones.
Jews felt that way about Israel for thousands of years
and there's precedence for them living in Israel with roughly similar borders to now
- There's very little evidence that the great United Kingdom of Israel of David and Solomon described in the Old Testament ever actually existed. More likely, Ancient Israel and Judah emerged as two separate states rather than splitting from one larger one.
- The Ancient Kingdoms of Israel and Judah were most likely pagan, with monotheistic Judaism only gradually evolving later, probably only reaching a firm footing during the Babylonian Exile.
- The Hasmonean Kingdom, the other often-mentioned historic example of a "Jewish state", was a heavily Hellenised society. Hebrew as a spoken language had practically died out, replaced by Aramaic and Greek.
I could also add the point that the heartland of Ancient Israel and Judah was the central hill region of the Southern Levant, what is now the West Bank and the surrounding area. But when the Zionist movement's efforts to settle in Palestine largely ignored these areas, because they had a vision of building large agricultural settlements, and as a result they focused their resources on the Mediterranean coastal plains which had been outside or at the periphery of the ancient kingdoms.
3. The Palestinian Unity Government is a terrorist government.
- 09-01-2017 23:28
Jewish life only matters LOL
A few dead Jews and you a foreign country do this in solidarity
- Political Ambassador
- 11-01-2017 19:45