Turn on thread page Beta

Should the government provide free beer to all workers. watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    I think they should
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Very insensitive to Muslims.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RedManc)
    I think they should
    Who will distill the beer if it's being given away for free? No profits = no wages for the people making it.

    I imagine you'd make a "national beer service" and tax people to pay for it; but then, as you'll notice, that isn't free at all, it's just being paid for indirectly as opposed to directly.

    It's that old "I like the NHS because it's free" myth again...
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Connor27)
    Who will distill the beer if it's being given away for free? No profits = no wages for the people making it.

    I imagine you'd make a "national beer service" and tax people to pay for it; but then, as you'll notice, that isn't free at all, it's just being paid for indirectly as opposed to directly.

    It's that old "I like the NHS because it's free" myth again...
    But it would mean you wouldn't have to buy beer so it is no extra tax, unless you are a muslim because they can't drink alcohol. The money will go to pubs. This is so pubs can remain open.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RedManc)
    But it would mean you wouldn't have to buy beer so it is no extra tax, unless you are a muslim because they can't drink alcohol. The money will go to pubs. This is so pubs can remain open.
    Sorry, your argument is really incoherent, just to clarify:

    You would introduce a tax, but it would go to pubs, and your justification for that is that it is no extra expenditure.

    Fine, who's gonna pay the wages of the people that distill the beer? If it's not being sold commercially then the employer is making losses and can't pay them permanently, eventually they'll be working for free. That means you need to use the tax to pay wages (that's how nationalised services work), meaning that you can't use the money to fund pubs.

    I'd recommend reading up on a little topic called economics.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Connor27)
    Sorry, your argument is really incoherent, just to clarify:

    You would introduce a tax, but it would go to pubs, and your justification for that is that it is no extra expenditure.

    Fine, who's gonna pay the wages of the people that distill the beer? If it's not being sold commercially then the employer is making losses and can't pay them permanently, eventually they'll be working for free. That means you need to use the tax to pay wages (that's how nationalised services work), meaning that you can't use the money to fund pubs.

    I'd recommend reading up on a little topic called economics.
    the government will pay the employer
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RedManc)
    the government will pay the employer
    Where do you think the government gets its money from sunshine? Taxes!

    Or would you rather we started borrowing again and rack up eye watering debt and get another recession?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Connor27)
    Where do you think the government gets its money from sunshine? Taxes!
    There would be no increases in tax, but we'll raid the foreign aid budget.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RedManc)
    There would be no increases in tax, but we'll raid the foreign aid budget.
    Yeah! And then we get UN and NATO sanctions for not complying with humanitarian efforts.

    Welcome to North Korea! All class traitors will be executed.

    Also worth pointing out that foreign aid is only 0.7% of the budget, you'll need a little more than that to fund the wages of every person working in a distillery in the U.K.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Connor27)
    Yeah! And then we get UN and NATO sanctions for not complying with humanitarian efforts.

    Welcome to North Korea! All class traitors will be executed
    No not necessarily, we pay the highest amount in foreign aid.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RedManc)
    No not necessarily, we pay the highest amount in foreign aid.
    It's also only 0.7% of the budget, good luck paying everyone in the alcohol industry's wages with that, people definitely won't go and work abroad for more money with that measly level of funding...
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pulse.)
    Very insensitive to Muslims.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    I don't think it matters if they brake their religion.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Connor27)
    It's also only 0.7% of the budget, good luck paying everyone in the alcohol industry's wages with that, people definitely won't go and work abroad for more money with that measly level of funding...
    we'll use the money we stopped paying the EU to fund it
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Connor27)
    It's also only 0.7% of the budget, good luck paying everyone in the alcohol industry's wages with that, people definitely won't go and work abroad for more money with that measly level of funding...
    Don't feed the troll :rolleyes:
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Drewski)
    Don't feed the troll :rolleyes:
    I'm not a troll.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RedManc)
    I'm not a troll.
    Sure kid.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Drewski)
    Sure kid.
    I'm the Supreme Commander of all the trolls.



    Spoiler:
    Show

    It's a joke
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by Connor27)
    Who will distill the beer if it's being given away for free? No profits = no wages for the people making it.

    I imagine you'd make a "national beer service" and tax people to pay for it; but then, as you'll notice, that isn't free at all, it's just being paid for indirectly as opposed to directly.

    It's that old "I like the NHS because it's free" myth again...
    Beer is not typically distilled. Although a liquid similar to malt liquor is distilled to make whisky.

    Also beer comes in such a wide variety of styles and quality that the government simply giving away free beer of a single type will inevitably not satisfy most beer drinkers. Not all beers are created equal. I'd imagine that the government would give away the cheapest beer they can source, which is typically going to be something similar to Carling/Carlsberg. As there exist people who actually like beer, there is still a market for selling beer to those people.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Free beer- depends on the beer it is. If it is muck called beer such as Budweiser, then no thanks.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RedManc)
    I'm not a troll.
    You are a troll.
    Im sure everyone would agree with me.
 
 
 
Poll
Do you think parents should charge rent?
Useful resources

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.