Turn on thread page Beta
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by inshaa)
    was it supposed to be 1.91 x 10^10 ???
    I'm not too sure I got 1.99X10^8 and what was the shape of the force against extension graph ?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Luj99)
    I think I did and how did your force against extension graph look like ?
    Passed limit of proportionality at 5.9N and then started curving I think
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Chapers64)
    Passed limit of proportionality at 5.9N and then started curving I think
    But they asked to draw a line of best fit so how can it curve?
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Luj99)
    But they asked to draw a line of best fit so how can it curve?
    A line of best fit goes through all the points.. So in this case it has to be a curve.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Got 1.97 x 10^10 for young modulus
    I used 5.5N and 0.008m


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Chapers64)
    Uncertainty on metre rule is +/- 0.5mm, 0.5/60 = 0.83%
    You're wrong the uncertainty on a meter rule is +/- 1mm
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    i think till 6N it obeyed Hookes law then it lost its elastic behaviour...plastic deformation began so mine was a a curve.. what about yours?
    (Original post by Luj99)
    I'm not too sure I got 1.99X10^8 and what was the shape of the force against extension graph ?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    yeah mine too was a curve from 5.9-6.0 N
    (Original post by Chapers64)
    Passed limit of proportionality at 5.9N and then started curving I think
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by inshaa)
    i think till 6N it obeyed Hookes law then it lost its elastic behaviour...plastic deformation began so mine was a a curve.. what about yours?
    I just drew a straight line of best fit
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mandax_25)
    You're wrong the uncertainty on a meter rule is +/- 1mm
    Was it okay to round it off to 2%


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mandax_25)
    You're wrong the uncertainty on a meter rule is +/- 1mm
    No that's the minimum division, the absolute uncertainty is half the minimum division, https://www.physicsforums.com/thread...e-rule.610200/ check for yourself
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    and what about your percentage uncertanity ? was it 1.7%
    (Original post by Luj99)
    I just drew a straight line of best fit
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    what about the one for the burns? Did we have to describe about the nodes, anti nodes and the change of phase?:confused::confused:
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by zenab_k)
    For the percentage uncertainty weren't we supposed to change 0.01mm into cm then divide it by 6 and multiply it by 100?
    If you used vernier calliper as your measuring tool, that's correct
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by inshaa)
    what about the one for the burns? Did we have to describe about the nodes, anti nodes and the change of phase?:confused::confused:
    The burns occurred at the antinodes so distance between adjacent antinodes is half lamda. Therefore twice d is lamda.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    i lost my 2 marks there... i talked about the wave being hit on a barrier so it traveled a distance L a the reflected wave travels back giving a total distance of 2L
    (Original post by Droneon)
    The burns occurred at the antinodes so distance between adjacent antinodes is half lamda. Therefore twice d is lamda.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Chapers64)
    No that's the minimum division, the absolute uncertainty is half the minimum division, https://www.physicsforums.com/thread...e-rule.610200/ check for yourself
    Yeh I guess you're right... You can take the uncertainty as either +/- 0.5mm or 1mm.
    You'll get marks either way.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mandax_25)
    Yeh I guess you're right... You can take the uncertainty as either +/- 0.5mm or 1mm.
    You'll get marks either way.
    Is it okay if I rounded off the % uncertainty to 2% instead of 1.7%?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Droneon)
    Is it okay if I rounded off the % uncertainty to 2% instead of 1.7%?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Anyone??


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    I kept my percentage uncertainty as 1.67% i didnt round it off to 1.7% i would still get the mark right?
 
 
 
Poll
Do you think parents should charge rent?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.