Edexcel IAL Physics Unit 03 WPH03 - 10th of May, 2017 Watch

cenet0:o
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#81
Report 1 year ago
#81
(Original post by examhater44)
I kept my percentage uncertainty as 1.67% i didnt round it off to 1.7% i would still get the mark right?
Yeh that's rounded to 3sf so you'd be fine
0
quote
reply
FutureStripper
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#82
Report 1 year ago
#82
I doubt it, sorry!

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
quote
reply
inshaa
Badges: 7
Rep:
?
#83
Report 1 year ago
#83
i think they allow 2.s.f. / 3.s.f .... if they see your previous working out and the method you have done.. i think they can award marks!!
0
quote
reply
Pink_Sparkles
  • Political Ambassador
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#84
Report 1 year ago
#84
(Original post by AdemN)
Percentage uncertainty was 1.7%
I got same
0
quote
reply
Pink_Sparkles
  • Political Ambassador
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#85
Report 1 year ago
#85
(Original post by inshaa)
i lost my 2 marks there... i talked about the wave being hit on a barrier so it traveled a distance L a the reflected wave travels back giving a total distance of 2L
wait I wrote the same , is it wrong ??
0
quote
reply
christos123456
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#86
Report 1 year ago
#86
What did the diagram look like for the circuit to find the resistance of a filament lamp?
0
quote
reply
Pink_Sparkles
  • Political Ambassador
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#87
Report 1 year ago
#87
(Original post by Droneon)
The burns occurred at the antinodes so distance between adjacent antinodes is half lamda. Therefore twice d is lamda.


Posted from TSR Mobile
wait how did u know that burns occur at anti node? didnt they say that the wavelength of the microwave is equal to twice the distance between the burn marks so isnt it suppose to be like lambda= 2 x length ?
0
quote
reply
Pink_Sparkles
  • Political Ambassador
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#88
Report 1 year ago
#88
(Original post by christos123456)
What did the diagram look like for the circuit to find the resistance of a filament lamp?
Idk if correct but I included a bulb , an ammeter, a voltmeter a battery and a variable resistor
what did u put ?
0
quote
reply
FutureStripper
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#89
Report 1 year ago
#89
Because at anti nodes constructive interference occurs, causing the burn marks. Nodes have no energy
0
quote
reply
ashmjj
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#90
Report 1 year ago
#90
hey could we use vernier callipers for finding the distance between burn marks?
0
quote
reply
Pink_Sparkles
  • Political Ambassador
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#91
Report 1 year ago
#91
(Original post by ashmjj)
hey could we use vernier callipers for finding the distance between burn marks?
can we say like a normal ruler with a precision of 0.1 cm ??
0
quote
reply
ashmjj
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#92
Report 1 year ago
#92
(Original post by shahida sulaiman)
can we say like a normal ruler with a precision of 0.1 cm ??
i think u can i mean why not meter rule can be used to find that distance just that it's not that precise as vernier!
0
quote
reply
Pink_Sparkles
  • Political Ambassador
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#93
Report 1 year ago
#93
(Original post by ashmjj)
i think u can i mean why not meter rule can be used to find that distance just that it's not that precise as vernier!
but they didnt say anything about the instrument ,they say like the instrument u would use and the choice of instrument , they didnt say anything about it being precise right ?
0
quote
reply
christos123456
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#94
Report 1 year ago
#94
I got the same!

(Original post by shahida sulaiman)
Idk if correct but I included a bulb , an ammeter, a voltmeter a battery and a variable resistor
what did u put ?
0
quote
reply
ashmjj
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#95
Report 1 year ago
#95
(Original post by shahida sulaiman)
but they didnt say anything about the instrument ,they say like the instrument u would use and the choice of instrument , they didnt say anything about it being precise right ?
yep they dint! DW meter rule scores the marks
0
quote
reply
Pink_Sparkles
  • Political Ambassador
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#96
Report 1 year ago
#96
(Original post by ashmjj)
yep they dint! DW meter rule scores the marks
yeah thats the problem I just wrote a ruler with 0.1 cm precision , I think thats wrong
0
quote
reply
Pink_Sparkles
  • Political Ambassador
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#97
Report 1 year ago
#97
(Original post by christos123456)
I got the same!
do they like give zero if we convert like mm to m or MHz to Hz wrong ?

(Original post by ashmjj)
yep they dint! DW meter rule scores the marks
0
quote
reply
FutureStripper
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#98
Report 1 year ago
#98
I don't think so, I put ruler to be safe
0
quote
reply
FutureStripper
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#99
Report 1 year ago
#99
(Original post by shahida sulaiman)
yeah thats the problem I just wrote a ruler with 0.1 cm precision , I think thats wrong
Why do you think it's wrong?
0
quote
reply
Pink_Sparkles
  • Political Ambassador
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#100
Report 1 year ago
#100
(Original post by FutureStripper)
Why do you think it's wrong?
because of the precision and mostly people wrote meter rule not ruler
0
quote
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

University open days

  • University of Lincoln
    Mini Open Day at the Brayford Campus Undergraduate
    Wed, 19 Dec '18
  • University of East Anglia
    UEA Mini Open Day Undergraduate
    Fri, 4 Jan '19
  • Bournemouth University
    Undergraduate Mini Open Day Undergraduate
    Wed, 9 Jan '19

Do you have any savings?

Yes (173)
67.58%
No (83)
32.42%

Watched Threads

View All