Turn on thread page Beta

Election of a Speaker: 1st Round of Voting watch

Announcements
  • View Poll Results: Who should be elected Speaker of the Model House of Commons?
    hazzer1998
    3
    6.00%
    adam9317
    10
    20.00%
    PetrosAC
    18
    36.00%
    Aph
    2
    4.00%
    DanE1998
    5
    10.00%
    Nigel Farage MEP
    6
    12.00%
    cBay
    2
    4.00%
    Re-Open Nominations (Election process will restart)
    4
    8.00%

    • Wiki Support Team
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    Speakership Election

    Voting is now open in the speakership election. If a candidate receives more than 50% they will be elected immediately, otherwise the top two candidates will go into a second round of voting.

    hazzer1998
    The Logical Choice for speaker

    We need a speaker that will recognize that fairness and being non partisan is a vital quality in taking on the role of being speaker of the MHoC. If elected speaker I will ensure theses qualities are upheld to the highest's of standards and every member new or old , labour or conservative , UKIP or socialist (Even the liberals to) are treated with fairness and their contributions are valued.
    We deserve a speaker that has the experience and organisation skills to take on the important role of being speaker. I will
    -Consult the house on the idea of moving the daily update to the Morning / Afternoon rather then the evening so when members log on the daily update and new legislation is posted
    -Continue working with the CC and ensure every party has one representative that is active and making crisis's for the house
    -Ensure Party MP seats are filled and will run by-elections if any MP voting record falls below 70%
    -Create a new “The speakers Chamber” Thread and a “Speaker Announcement” Thread for any important announcements / statements can be made and read in one thread
    -Consult the house on the election of a Third Chairman of ways and means or2nd Deputy Speaker
    With theses proposals and the members that we have I hope we can work together to make the house a better place for everyone


    adam9317



    PetrosAC



    Aph
    I, Aph, doth hereby declare that I, Aph, doth hereby proclaim that I, Aph, doth hereby put myself forward as nominee for the position of speaker.

    As speaker I will be harsh and decisive. I will issue a death blow to all failing TSR institutions and parties. I will use the full extent of my new found power to overhaul the definitions and interpretations found in the GD, I will reset precedent and harshly punish all who step out of line. I will end this endemic of people using devices in ways they aren't meant to be used and I promise to spy openly and regularly on all party sub-forums. I will also combat nastiness in the sub-forum by working with the CT to begin overzealous moderation of the MHOC to crackdown on even the slightest personal attack.

    Vote for me to make the MHOC great again!!!


    DanE1998



    Nigel Farage MEP



    cBay

    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    This is a very tough decision indeed as Adam, Petros and Dan have really impressed me. However, after much deliberation, I have decided to vote for PetrosAC. He's very active, very fair and has some very sensible policies. That said, I think both Adam and Dan would make good Speakers if they were elected.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    I've decided to vote for Aph. Despite the fact that his manifesto was undeniably ****, I know from personal experience that he will be good at the administrative side of being Speaker, and that despite being harsh (which, imo, the House needs at the moment anyway), he will carry out his duties fairly and without fear or favour.
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by cranbrook_aspie)
    I've decided to vote for Aph. Despite the fact that his manifesto was undeniably ****, I know from personal experience that he will be good at the administrative side of being Speaker, and that despite being harsh (which, imo, the House needs at the moment anyway), he will carry out his duties fairly and without fear or favour.
    We would also have the joys of pointing out half a dozen errors a day

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jammy Duel)
    We would also have the joys of pointing out half a dozen errors a day

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    *You, and you forgot the word 'perceived'.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Might give this RON bloke a go.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    #danwecan
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DanE1998)
    #danwecan
    This hashtag makes me cringe into my shell.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by Nigel Farage MEP)
    That is fine, the Crisis Committee's private forum does not have rules in place to stop leaking; I carefully read the Crisis Committee's Constitution before doing anything. It is not bending the rules, it is operating in the rules to bring about favourable outcomes, it is playing the game in the way it should be played. You do not like it because I have outplayed you twice by writing an amendment to get around the Constitution, and leaking ideas from the Crisis Committee forum.
    Well, it says in the CC Constitution that members shouldn't leak details of planned crises...

    Also, you haven't 'outplayed' me at all. You've failed 4 times to close down the CC from the outside and once to destroy it from the inside out.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Quamquam123)
    Well, it says in the CC Constitution that members shouldn't leak details of planned crises...

    Also, you haven't 'outplayed' me at all. You've failed 4 times to close down the CC from the outside and once to destroy it from the inside out.
    No, the Crisis Committee Constitution gives guidance to members by making the suggestion members should not leak things, it does not explicitly state members should not leak things, nor are there consequences for leaking things. I have made you complain about my moves which is a win, I cannot stop MPs from choosing to abstain when they voted aye before.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by Nigel Farage MEP)
    No, the Crisis Committee Constitution gives guidance to members by making the suggestion members should not leak things, it does not explicitly state members should not leak things, nor are there consequences for leaking things. I have made you complain about my moves which is a win, I cannot stop MPs from choosing to abstain when they voted aye before.
    No, members are expected no to leak details of crises. Just because there aren't consequences, doesn't mean breaking that rule is wrong. I would be very concerned that if you were to be elected Speaker, you would apply a similar attitude and carry out controversial actions because you can get away with doing so.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Quamquam123)
    No, members are expected no to leak details of crises. Just because there aren't consequences, doesn't mean breaking that rule is wrong. I would be very concerned that if you were to be elected Speaker, you would apply a similar attitude and carry out controversial actions because you can get away with doing so.
    An expectation is not a rule, if the Crisis Committee is going to be secret there should be rules to abide all members to secrecy.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Which of the candidates do not want to relax new party formation rules?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    Which of the candidates do not want to relax new party formation rules?
    do they automatically get ur vote?
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by fleky6910)
    do they automatically get ur vote?
    No.

    I've ruled some people out but have not 100% decided on others.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    So Nigel has indeed been breaking the subforum privacy rule:

    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    Which of the candidates do not want to relax new party formation rules?
    Nigel sorry it was something else he was against

    I can't see anyone who stated a position who said they would stick to the 10 member guideline
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    Which of the candidates do not want to relax new party formation rules?
    I would like to relax the rules, but there still needs to be a core of active members to form the party.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    I see.

    Which parties do the candidates believe the House is missing?
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    I see.

    Which parties do the candidates believe the House is missing?
    IS it so hard for you to look back at the Q&A and see which candidates bothered to answer and how they answered?
 
 
 
Poll
Do you think parents should charge rent?
Useful resources

Articles:

Debate and current affairs forum guidelines

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.