Turn on thread page Beta

Are 21st century Liberals actually Liberal? watch

Announcements
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    I've noticed a large amount of protest to Le Donalds presidency. Obviously from the opposition which is the left -who are supposed to support freedom and democracy. Then why must they protest a democratic election and not even give the bloke a chance? I'm not a Trump supporter but if I'd have spent so much time and effort campaigning I'd be quite p*ssed off that people won't even respect the democratic election and give me a chance.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JackG9)
    I'm not a Trump supporter but if I'd have spent so much time and effort campaigning I'd be quite p*ssed off that people won't even respect the democratic election and give me a chance.
    I'm not a Clinton supporter but if I'd have spent so much time and effort campaigning I'd be quite p*ssed off that the electoral system enabled the candidate who received comfortably fewer votes to be declared the winner.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anarchism101)
    I'm not a Clinton supporter but if I'd have spent so much time and effort campaigning I'd be quite p*ssed off that the electoral system enabled the candidate who received comfortably fewer votes to be declared the winner.
    Both Trump and Clinton would have campaigned in many different states and with different resources if it was based on the popular vote. That's a silly argument.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    At least fascists are honest about being pro-censorship and anti-democracy. These 'liberals' will make you think you are free and then stab you in the back. Very childish...
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    They are in fact the opposite.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by midnightice)
    Both Trump and Clinton would have campaigned in many different states and with different resources if it was based on the popular vote. That's a silly argument.
    They likely would have done, yes, but that's in no way a defence of the electoral college.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anarchism101)
    They likely would have done, yes, but that's in no way a defence of the electoral college.
    I think it is very fair, otherwise California would effectively always decide who was president each time.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by midnightice)
    I think it is very fair, otherwise California would effectively always decide who was president each time.
    Not really, California is just 12% of the US population.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anarchism101)
    Not really, California is just 12% of the US population.
    Just 12%...
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    The complete opposite. They are the ones trying to prohibit free speech now.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anarchism101)
    I'm not a Clinton supporter but if I'd have spent so much time and effort campaigning I'd be quite p*ssed off that the electoral system enabled the candidate who received comfortably fewer votes to be declared the winner.
    That's such a stupid argument. Trump played to win the electoral votes not the popular vote. It's like playing football; trump played to win the game , not to play good football.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JackG9)
    I've noticed a large amount of protest to Le Donalds presidency. Obviously from the opposition which is the left -who are supposed to support freedom and democracy. Then why must they protest a democratic election and not even give the bloke a chance? I'm not a Trump supporter but if I'd have spent so much time and effort campaigning I'd be quite p*ssed off that people won't even respect the democratic election and give me a chance.
    Protesting a result is not the same thing as protesting democracy.

    You don't have to accept the result of an election and 'unite' behind that. If you did then we shouldn't even bother having democracy at all.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SHallowvale)
    Protesting a result is not the same thing as protesting democracy.

    You don't have to accept the result of an election and 'unite' behind that. If you did then we shouldn't even bother having democracy at all.
    he hasnt even done anything yet lol what you gotta protest about ahaha youre trying to overturn a election through protest
    Offline

    17
    People normally protest democratic elections when it doesn't favour them. It's not exactly a new thing.
    The republicans also protested Obama's election back in 2008.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by StrawbAri)
    People normally protest democratic elections when it doesn't favour them. It's not exactly a new thing.
    The republicans also protested Obama's election back in 2008.
    They didn't break windows and spraypaint private property.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JackG9)
    That's such a stupid argument. Trump played to win the electoral votes not the popular vote.
    Which is a systemic problem. I'm not blaming Trump for not seeking the popular vote, I'm blaming the electoral college for not requiring and incentivising him to do so.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by StrawbAri)
    People normally protest democratic elections when it doesn't favour them. It's not exactly a new thing.
    The republicans also protested Obama's election back in 2008.
    Not to the same extent as Trump
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pikachū)
    They didn't break windows and spraypaint private property.
    Property is theft!

    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JackG9)
    I've noticed a large amount of protest to Le Donalds presidency. Obviously from the opposition which is the left -who are supposed to support freedom and democracy. Then why must they protest a democratic election and not even give the bloke a chance? I'm not a Trump supporter but if I'd have spent so much time and effort campaigning I'd be quite p*ssed off that people won't even respect the democratic election and give me a chance.
    Fact is he's president but that doesn't mean we can't hold him to account. Protests are a key part of the democratic process.
    I am wholeheartedly against him getting rid of climate change action, to me climate change is an issue that shouldn't be left until it's too late,
    But not only that, he didn't get the most votes! He got over a million less than Clinton. That's odd.
    But Abraham Lincoln won the election with less votes than his opponent and he did a great job as president in my opinion. So we'll just have to see but Trumps outlook I don't agree with.
    Offline

    17
    (Original post by Pikachū)
    They didn't break windows and spraypaint private property.
    Maybe not exactly but
    They behaved pretty badly imo

    They even torched a black church smh
 
 
 
Poll
Do you think parents should charge rent?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.