Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    A hunter is shooting pheasants and misses with a probability of 75%. He continues hunting until his first hit.
    Find the probability Pn that the hunter hits on the nth shot and verify that the sum(Pn) from n=1 to infinity is 1.

    For the first part I found that Pn = (1/4)^(n-1) * (3/4)^n
    As for the second part I am not sure what I should do with the sum to prove that it converges to 1. I tried rewriting (1/4)^(n-1) * (3/4)^n as (1-3/4)^(n-1) * (3/4)^n and then expanding (1-3/4)^(n-1) part with binomial expansion but it did not seem to help as all of the terms tend to infinity as n tends to infinity.
    I would appreciate any help!
    Thank you in advance!
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by spacewalker)
    A hunter is shooting pheasants and misses with a probability of 75%. He continues hunting until his first hit.
    Find the probability Pn that the hunter hits on the nth shot and verify that the sum(Pn) from n=1 to infinity is 1.

    For the first part I found that Pn = (1/4)^(n-1) * (3/4)^n
    As for the second part I am not sure what I should do with the sum to prove that it converges to 1. I tried rewriting (1/4)^(n-1) * (3/4)^n as (1-3/4)^(n-1) * (3/4)^n and then expanding (1-3/4)^(n-1) part with binomial expansion but it did not seem to help as all of the terms tend to infinity as n tends to infinity.
    I would appreciate any help!
    Thank you in advance!
    Check your Pn - it is true for n = 1 but doesn't work for n=2 etc... because for the first hit being on the nth shot, it appears you are multiplying the probability of n index failures by (n-1) indep successes?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SeanFM)
    Check your Pn - it is true for n = 1 but doesn't work for n=2 etc... because for the first hit being on the nth shot, it appears you are multiplying the probability of n index failures by (n-1) indep successes?
    Oh right, thank you! It should be (3/4)^(n-1)*(1/4). However, I still do not see how the sum of this can give 1 since as n tends to infinity should not (3/4)^(n-1) tend to 1? And so 1 times 1/4 should give 1/4.
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by spacewalker)
    Oh right, thank you! It should be (3/4)^(n-1)*(1/4). However, I still do not see how the sum of this can give 1 since as n tends to infinity should not (3/4)^(n-1) tend to 1? And so 1 times 1/4 should give 1/4.
    No, because (and it's helpful to test these things on a calculator eg by finding (3/4)^1000) a value between 0 and 1 raised to a high power tends to 0.

    So, how do you find the sum to infinity of those probabilities?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SeanFM)
    No, because (and it's helpful to test these things on a calculator eg by finding (3/4)^1000) a value between 0 and 1 raised to a high power tends to 0.

    So, how do you find the sum to infinity of those probabilities?
    Thank you for your reply! (3/4)^(n-1) * (1/4) simplifies to (3/4)^(n-1) * (1-3/4) = (3/4)^(n-1) - (3/4)^n but then from here I am not sure what to do. Could you please give me a hint on what technique I should use?
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by spacewalker)
    Thank you for your reply! (3/4)^(n-1) * (1/4) simplifies to (3/4)^(n-1) * (1-3/4) = (3/4)^(n-1) - (3/4)^n but then from here I am not sure what to do. Could you please give me a hint on what technique I should use?
    Gone too far by trying to simplify what you first had, but don't worry, it's all about trying until you work out the right method.

    To give you a hint, what is P(n) when n= 1?

    How about when n=2 and n= 3? Can you see a pattern then see how it makes sense from the general term, and how you can sum it up?
    Online

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by spacewalker)
    Thank you for your reply! (3/4)^(n-1) * (1/4) simplifies to (3/4)^(n-1) * (1-3/4) = (3/4)^(n-1) - (3/4)^n but then from here I am not sure what to do. Could you please give me a hint on what technique I should use?
    It's a Geometric Progression, for which there's a formula for the sum. Google "Sum of a GP".

    You're actually quite close to being able to work it out yourself.

    If a_n = (3/4)^{n-1} - (3/4)^n, then

    a_1+a_2+...+a_n

    = \underbrace{(3/4)^0 - (3/4)^1}_{a_1} + \underbrace{(3/4)^1 - (3/4)^2}_{a_2}+...+\underbrace{(3/4)^{n-2} - (3/4)^{n-1}}_{a_{n-1}} + \underbrace{(3/4)^{n-1} - (3/4)^{n}}_{a_{n}}

    Look for terms that cancel (hint: nearly everything cancels!) and you're left with

    (3/4)^0 - (3/4)^n (and of course (3/4)^0 = 1).
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SeanFM)
    Gone too far by trying to simplify what you first had, but don't worry, it's all about trying until you work out the right method.

    To give you a hint, what is P(n) when n= 1?

    How about when n=2 and n= 3? Can you see a pattern then see how it makes sense from the general term, and how you can sum it up?
    Thank you! I have just realised to use sum for GP when I went to bed. I have no idea how I could not see that
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by spacewalker)
    Thank you! I have just realised to use sum for GP when I went to bed. I have no idea how I could not see that
    Actually I was a bit close minded - see above for how to use method of differences to solve it too.
    Online

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SeanFM)
    Actually I was a bit close minded - see above for how to use method of differences to solve it too.
    It's funny, I've never seen the GP sum proved by differences, but I saw what the OP had written in that post (where they'd already made the critical step of splitting each term in the appropriate ratio) and I saw it would work. I think it's quite a cool way of doing it - they should definitely do it as an example in FM when you have a whole topic on method of differences.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: January 26, 2017
Poll
“Yanny” or “Laurel”
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.